본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어판 정신분열병의 캘거리 우울증 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구

A Study on the Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (K-CDSS)

이경민|원성두|한창수|최현석|이분희|김용구|장홍석
대한신경정신의학회 (Korean Neuropsychiatric Association)|2005.07|신경정신의학 (JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION)|제44권 제4호|pp. 446-455

2

조회

0

다운로드

24

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류정신과학

초록

Objectives：This study was performed to standardize the Korean Version of Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (K-CDSS), a semi-structured interview scale to assess depression in schizophrenia patients and to determine the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the K-CDSS. Methods：Sixty-one patients diagnosed as schizophrenia by DSM-IV criteria were recruited in this study. Then, the patients were interviewed using the Structure Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) by a trained psychologist. Subsequently, the KCDSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Simpson Angus Rating Scale (SAS) were administered by a psychiatrist. Lastly, the K-CDSS was re-assessed by a second independent rater without any previous information of patients to confirm the inter-rater reliability. Results：The internal consistency using Cronbach’s α was 0.852. Inter-rater reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for single items and for sum score were 0.659-0.889 and 0.963, respectively. K-CDSS was assessed by a second Factor analysis and ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis were conducted . The factor analysis revealed a single factor that accounted for 53.7% of the total variance, suggesting that the uni-dimensional structure of the K-CDSS may be retained. In addition, K-CDSS showed a good convergent validity with very strong correlations with HDRS (r=0.75) and MADRS (r=0.81), respectively. However, K-CDSS was not correlated with PANSS-positive, PANSS-negative and SAS, demonstrating its satisfactory discriminant validity. The area under the ROC curve was 0.968 (standard error=0.036, p<.001). With a cut-off point of 8, the K-CDSS had a sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 97.9%, positive predictive value 90.9% and negative predictive value 95.8%. Conclusion：K-CDSS is considered as a short and valid tool to identify depressive symptoms in schizophrenia. (J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2005;44(4):446-455)

Abstract

Objectives：This study was performed to standardize the Korean Version of Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (K-CDSS), a semi-structured interview scale to assess depression in schizophrenia patients and to determine the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the K-CDSS. Methods：Sixty-one patients diagnosed as schizophrenia by DSM-IV criteria were recruited in this study. Then, the patients were interviewed using the Structure Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) by a trained psychologist. Subsequently, the KCDSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Simpson Angus Rating Scale (SAS) were administered by a psychiatrist. Lastly, the K-CDSS was re-assessed by a second independent rater without any previous information of patients to confirm the inter-rater reliability. Results：The internal consistency using Cronbach’s α was 0.852. Inter-rater reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for single items and for sum score were 0.659-0.889 and 0.963, respectively. K-CDSS was assessed by a second Factor analysis and ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis were conducted . The factor analysis revealed a single factor that accounted for 53.7% of the total variance, suggesting that the uni-dimensional structure of the K-CDSS may be retained. In addition, K-CDSS showed a good convergent validity with very strong correlations with HDRS (r=0.75) and MADRS (r=0.81), respectively. However, K-CDSS was not correlated with PANSS-positive, PANSS-negative and SAS, demonstrating its satisfactory discriminant validity. The area under the ROC curve was 0.968 (standard error=0.036, p<.001). With a cut-off point of 8, the K-CDSS had a sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 97.9%, positive predictive value 90.9% and negative predictive value 95.8%. Conclusion：K-CDSS is considered as a short and valid tool to identify depressive symptoms in schizophrenia. (J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2005;44(4):446-455)

참고문헌 (30)

  1. "Pyramidical model of schizophrenia", 16, pp.537~545
  2. "Diagnosis of secondary depression in schizophrenia:implicationsfor DSM-IV", 17, pp.75~98 (1991)
  3. "Depression in schizophrenia:recognition and management in the USA", 47, pp.185~197 (2001)
  4. "Developmentand prediction of postpsychotic depression in neuroleptictreatedschizophrenics", 39, pp.197~203 (1982)
  5. "Postpsychotic depression in schizophrenia", 33, pp.231~239 (1976)
  6. "Depression in schizophrenia perspective in the era of", pp.1379~1389
  7. "정신분열병의 경과 중 발생하는 우울증", 41, pp.421~429 (2002)
  8. "Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish versionof the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia", 68, pp.349~356 (2004)
  9. "Depression in chronic schizophrenia", 142, pp.465~470 (1983)
  10. "A rating scale for depression", 23, pp.56~62
  11. "Exactly what does the HamiltonDepression Rating Scale measure", 27, pp.259~273 (1993)
  12. "Reliabilityand validity of a depression rating scale for schizophrenics", 6, pp.201~208 (1992)
  13. "A depression rating scale forschizophrenics", 3, pp.247~251 (1990)
  14. "The Calgary Depression Rating Scale for Schizophrenia:development and interrater reliability of a German version(CDSS-G)", 33, pp.433~443 (1999)
  15. "The Greek version of the calgarydepression scale for schizophrenia", 94, pp.163~171 (2000)
  16. "The Japanese version of theCalgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenics(JCDSS)", 52, pp.163~166
  17. "Validity study of theBrazilian version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia", 32, pp.41~49 (1998)
  18. "Comparison of four scales measuring depressionin schizophrenic inpatients", 15, pp.274~277 (2000)
  19. "정신분열증 환자의 우울증에 관한 연구", 20, pp.84~93 (1981)
  20. "양성 및 음성 정신분열증 입원환자에 있어서우울증의 성질과 빈도", 31, pp.106~112 (1992)
  21. "Clinical Handbook of PsychotropicDrugs", pp.106~109 (2004), Hogrefe and Huber Publishers
  22. "DSM-IV의 제1축 장애의 구조화된 면담" (2000), 서울,도서출판 하나의학사
  23. "한국판 양성 및 음성증후군척도(Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale)의신뢰도 및 타당도", 40, pp.1090~1105 (2001)
  24. "A rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects", 212 suppl, pp.11~19 (1970)
  25. "A new depression scale designed to besensitive to change", pp.382~389
  26. "우울증상을 수반한 만성 정신분열병 입원환자에서의 Paroxetine 효과:이중맹검 위약대조 연구", 39, pp.774~786 (2000)
  27. "문항반응 이론과 요인분석을 이용한 척도개발 및 타당화 99년도 임상심리학회 3차 workshop" (1999), 임상심리학회
  28. "Evaluation ofdepression in schizophrenia:psychometric properties of a French versionof the Calgary Depression Scale", 89, pp.123~132 (1999)
  29. "A psychometric comparisonof the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and the HamiltonDepression Rating Scale", 19, pp.205~212 (1996)
  30. "Specificity of theCalgary Depression Scale for schizophrenics", 11, pp.239~244 (1994)

관련 논문AI추천

정신분열병 환자에서 우울증의 빈도 및 위험요인김진성, 류지안, 서완석, 이종범영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2007 · 제24권 제2호정신분열증의 정신증 후 우울장애의 예측인자구본훈, 김이영, 김정엽, 김진성, 배대석, 서완석, 이종범영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2005 · 제22권 제2호Validation of the Korean Version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms박선철, 박중규, 이승환, 이정석, 이중서, 장선경, 최기홍대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2017 · 제14권 제4호정신분열병 입원환자의 우울증상 유병 률 및 예측인자원승희, 장성만, 정재훈대한생물치료정신의학회 · 생물치료정신의학2011 · 제17권 제1호Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia이창욱, 임현국, 한창태, 홍승철, Wang-Youn Won대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2012 · 제9권 제4호한국판 Sheehan Disability Scale의 신뢰도와 타당도 연구김지혜, 박준영한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2010 · 제29권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)

대한신경정신의학회 '장기발전계획 테스크 포스팀' 활동 보고권준수pp. 387-388대한신경정신의학회 정책 연구소의 설립 제안이해국, 채정호pp. 389-396대한신경정신의학회 정책개발 연구최종혁, 김병창, 이영문pp. 397-415대한신경정신의학회 회칙 개정에 대한 제언박종익, 이중서pp. 416-419한신경정신의학회 연구학회의 발전방향김재진, 권준수, 전양환, 김찬형pp. 420-424
원문 보기