본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

메타회귀분석을 이용한 해수유통 편익추정 - 금강을 중심으로 -

Estimating the Benefits of Seawater Flowing by using Meta-Regression for Benefit Transfer - Case of Geumgang River -

신창섭|조원주
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society Of Rural Planning)|2023.11|농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)|제29권 제4호|pp. 191-200

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Environmental BenefitBenefits TransferGeumgang RiverMeta-RegressionSeawater Flowing
주제분류농학

초록

This study aims to estimate the value of environmental services that could be generated by seawater flowing in the Geumgang Estuary by using meta-regression for benefit transfer. The environmental services that can be generated by seawater flowing are assumed to be improved water quality, increased biodiversity, and enhanced water-friendly effect. The analysis was conducted using 122 data from 28 studies from EVIS. The results show that households in the neighborhood where seawater is distributed are willing to pay about KRW 46,918, KRW 7,752, and KRW 7,859 per year for improved water quality, increased biodiversity, and enhanced water-friendly, respectively. The WTP of the national households other than neighboring households was found to be KRW 19,401, KRW 3,206, and KRW 3,250 for the three environmental services, respectively. The WTP for water quality improvement is higher than that for biodiversity increase and water-friendly effect increase, which may be due to the fact that water quality improvement is an environmental service that is close to the use value. In addition, neighboring households have a higher WTP than national households because neighboring households are more likely to evaluate the benefits of seawater flowing as a use value, while national households are more likely to evaluate it as a non-use value.

Abstract

This study aims to estimate the value of environmental services that could be generated by seawater flowing in the Geumgang Estuary by using meta-regression for benefit transfer. The environmental services that can be generated by seawater flowing are assumed to be improved water quality, increased biodiversity, and enhanced water-friendly effect. The analysis was conducted using 122 data from 28 studies from EVIS. The results show that households in the neighborhood where seawater is distributed are willing to pay about KRW 46,918, KRW 7,752, and KRW 7,859 per year for improved water quality, increased biodiversity, and enhanced water-friendly, respectively. The WTP of the national households other than neighboring households was found to be KRW 19,401, KRW 3,206, and KRW 3,250 for the three environmental services, respectively. The WTP for water quality improvement is higher than that for biodiversity increase and water-friendly effect increase, which may be due to the fact that water quality improvement is an environmental service that is close to the use value. In addition, neighboring households have a higher WTP than national households because neighboring households are more likely to evaluate the benefits of seawater flowing as a use value, while national households are more likely to evaluate it as a non-use value.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 안소은, "수요 및 공급측면에서 평가한 하천 생태계서비스의 경제적 가치", 대한환경공학회지, 38(10), pp.580~587 (2016), 대한환경공학회[DOI]
  2. An Application of Benefit Transfer to Outdoor Recreation Values in Korea, "Ahn, S.", Korea Enviroment Institute, ~, pp.Korea Enviroment Institute –RE-08 (2006)
  3. Estimating Wetland Values Using Meta-regression Benefit Transfer Method in Korea, "Ahn, S.", Korea Environment Institute, ~, pp.Korea Environment Institute, RE-08 (2007)
  4. 안송엽, "수질개선 편익 추정을 위한 조건부가치 측정법의 적용", 한국수처리학회지, 17(2), pp.13~26 (2009), 한국수처리학회
  5. 차주영, "편익이전 기법을 이용한 수자원의 가치 추정 연구: 메타회귀분석을 중심으로", 환경정책, 26(4), pp.105~122 (2018), 한국환경정책학회[DOI]
  6. 조승국, "한강수질개선의 속성별 경제적 편익: 컨조인트 분석법을 이용하여", 자원환경경제연구, 14(3), pp.655~672 (2005), 한국환경경제학회
  7. 정은성, "실험선택법과 대안 평가지수를 이용한 대안의 편익산정", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 41(1), pp.101~113 (2008), 한국수자원학회
  8. Desvousges, W., "Environmental Policy Analysis With Limited Information" (1998), Edward Elgar Publishing
  9. Eom, Y., "Empirical Evidence on Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation of Water Quality Improvement in Man Kyoung River", Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 10(03), pp.387~413 (2001)
  10. Hwang, B., "Transfer of Benefit-Resort Value of Palyung Mt., National Park Assessed by Meta-regression Analysis", Masters, pp.2011
  11. Jang, H., "Valuation of a river using benefit transfer with meta-analysis : with a focus on the Su-won river", Masters, pp.2013
  12. Jo, Y., "Estimation of WTP for Water Quality Improvements in Paldang Reservoir Using Contingent Valuation", Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 10(3), pp.433~460 (2001)
  13. Jeong, D., "Application of contingent valuation method for estimating willingnessto-pay in planning the intergrated sewerage system in the catchment of Dam Chung-Ju", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 13(2) (2004)
  14. Jeong, M., "A Comparative Study on Proximity Effects in Welfare Change from Water Contamination", Masters, pp.2010
  15. Socioeconomic Analysis of River Facility Management Plan for Geumgang and Yeongsan Rivers socioeconomic analysis of river facility management, "KAPF(The Korean Association of Public Finance)", ~ (2019)
  16. 곽승준, "컨조인트 분석을 이용한 한강하구의 가치추정", 경제학연구, 54(4), pp.141~161 (2006), 한국경제학회
  17. KDI(Korea Development Institute), "Yeongsan River Recovery Hampyeong District 3 Ecological River Creation Project", ~ (2009)
  18. Detailed Guidance for Conducting a Pre-Feasibility Study: Water Sector Study, "KDI(Korea Development Institute)", Water Sector Study, ~ (2022)
  19. Development of Sustainable Estuary Management Strategy in Korea Ⅲ - Estuary Management Palns and Programs -, "KEI(Korea Environment Institute)", ~ (2006)
  20. Kim, H., "Estimating the economic benefits of water quality improvements using meta-regression,", Environment Forums in KEI, 222, pp.1~16 (2018)
  21. 김기환, "조건부 가치측정법을 이용한 지불의사비교에 관한 연구", 한국행정학보, 38(3), pp.301~322 (2004), 한국행정학회
  22. 김성윤, "CVM을 이용한 관광자원의 가치평가: 경인아라뱃길을 중심으로", 호텔경영학연구, 21(5), pp.207~218 (2012), 한국호텔외식관광경영학회
  23. Kim, J., "Social Benefits of Improved Water Quality at the Taehwa River Based on Citizen`s Willingness-to-Pay", Journal of environmental policy, 06(1), pp.83~109 (2007)
  24. 김재홍, "다항선택형 조건부가치측정법을 이용한 태화강 수질개선의 경제적 가치 추정", 지방정부연구, 13(2), pp.137~154 (2009), 한국지방정부학회
  25. 김남희, "선택실험법을 이용한 새만금호 해수유통 정책 선호 연구", 환경정책, 28(3), pp.87~111 (2020), 한국환경정책학회[DOI]
  26. 공기서, "안양천 수질개선에 대한 주민의 사회적 선호", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 41(3), pp.315~324 (2008), 한국수자원학회
  27. 郭承俊, "댐 建設로 인한 環境影響의 屬性別 價値評價 - 條件附 選擇法을 適用하여 -", 경제학연구, 51(2), pp.9~259 (2003), 한국경제학회
  28. 권오상, "대규모 친환경농업단지 구축사업의 환경개선가치 평가 : 팔당클린농업벨트 조성사업을 사례로", 농업경제연구, 50(1), pp.33~56 (2009), 한국농업경제학회
  29. Lee, B., "Water Quality Characteristics Changing in Shihwa Coastal Reservoir through Increase in Sea Water Circulation", Korean Society of Water Quality, 2016, pp.105~106 (2016)
  30. 이범연, "시화호 해수유통량 증대에 따른 통계학적 수질 영향 분석", 한국물환경학회지, 37(6), pp.425~432 (2021), 한국물환경학회
  31. Lee, J., "Measuring the Economic Benefits of Water Quality Improvement of Nakdong-river -Using One One-Half Bound Dichotomous Choice Model", The Korean National Economic Association, 25(2), pp.111~129 (2007)
  32. 이희찬, "선택실험법을 이용한 만경강 하천공간 복원의 가치 평가", 환경정책, 24(3), pp.1~24 (2016), 한국환경정책학회[DOI]
  33. Development of Integrated Estuarine Management, "Ministry of Oceans", ~ (2014)
  34. 이승복, "수질 개선가치측정을 통한 환경기초시설 관리방안연구", 국토연구, 34, pp.4~60 (2002), 국토연구원
  35. 임윤택, "도시 생태하천공원의 가치 추정", 한국지역개발학회지, 17(3), pp.95~110 (2005), 한국지역개발학회
  36. 임슬예, "생태하천 복원사업의 경제적 편익 분석 - 남양천 및 유구천을 중심으로 -", 지역연구, 31(4), pp.25~45 (2015), 한국지역학회
  37. Nakdong River Research Ⅲ on operational improvement and ecological restoration measures, "Ministry of Environment", ~ (2021)
  38. Development of Sustainable Estuary Management Strategy in Korea Ⅲ-Current Status of Esturies and Estuary Management, "Noh, B.", ~ (2006)
  39. Park, D., "A Behavioral Analysis on Downstream Residents of Bukhan River for Soil-Contaminated Water Abatement", Masters, pp.2008
  40. 박소연, "장흥댐의 레크리에이션 편익 추정", 지역연구, 31(3), pp.79~97 (2015), 한국지역학회
  41. Rosenberger, Randall S., "Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: A technical document supporting the Forest Service Strategic Plan (2000 revision). Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-72. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture", Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 59, pp.72~ (2001)
  42. 신효중, "북한강 상류지역의 수질개선에 따른 중․하류지역의 수익자 지불용의액 추정", 서울도시연구, 10(4), pp.91~106 (2009), 서울연구원[DOI]
  43. 손민수, "청계천 친수공간 복원 전후의 응답자 효용변화에 관한 연구", 지역연구, 28(2), pp.23~37 (2012), 한국지역학회[DOI]
  44. 유승훈, "섬진강 하구의 환경가치 추정", 환경정책연구, 6(2), pp.1~25 (2007), 한국환경연구원[DOI]
  45. 유진채, "일점오양분선택모형을 이용한 청주·청원 지역의 수달 서식지 보호의 비시장적 가치추정", 자원환경경제연구, 17(2), pp.349~379 (2008), 한국환경경제학회
  46. 유승훈, "안성천 생태하천 복원의 경제적 편익", 지역연구, 25(1), pp.57~73 (2009), 한국지역학회

관련 논문AI추천

메타회귀분석 편익이전 기법을 이용한 휴양가치 추정안소은한국경제학회 · 경제학연구2007 · 제55권 제3호섬진강 하구의 환경가치 추정유승훈한국환경연구원 · 환경정책연구2007 · 제6권 제2호컨조인트 분석을 이용한 한강하구의 가치추정곽승준, 유승훈, 장정인한국경제학회 · 경제학연구2006 · 제54권 제4호보성갯벌의 비시장가치 평가구세주, 박선영, 유승훈한국해양수산개발원 · 해양정책연구2011 · 제26권 제2호메타분석을 활용한 양분수지 개선의 공익가치 추정김길원, 김태영, 이슬비, 한동근농업생명과학연구원 · 농업생명과학연구2022 · 제56권 제3호수질오염총량을 이용한 생태계 수질조절 서비스 가치 평가박경옥, 이창희한국습지학회 · 한국습지학회지2017 · 제19권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)

농촌중심지활성화사업에서의 사회복지사업 유형 및 내용 분석리재웅, 임정락pp. 1-11정주계층별 농촌생활서비스 기능정립 및 취약지역 기준에 관한 연구윤정미, 조영재, 한승석, 조승현pp. 13-26ANP 기법 활용 농업용수 거버넌스 구성요인 우선순위 분석최경숙, 이슬기pp. 27-34토픽모델링과 네트워크분석을 활용한 친환경농업 이슈분석에 관한 연구신은서, 김명현, 최진아, 김상범, 한석준, 안경진, 신예은pp. 35-53시군단위의 불투수면적률과 도시화 지표의 상관성 분석김현준, 김학관, 장민원, 최윤희pp. 55-67
원문 보기