본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국판 Hamilton 우울증 평가 척도의 신뢰도, 타당도 연구

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (K-HDRS)

신현균|한상익|김용식|이홍식|우행원|배승오|박두병|안용민|이중서|노경선
대한신경정신의학회 (Korean Neuropsychiatric Association)|2005.07|신경정신의학 (JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION)|제44권 제4호|pp. 456-465

2

조회

0

다운로드

166

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류정신과학

초록

Abstract

Objectives：The reliability and validity of the Korean version of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (K-HDRS) were examined in Korean patients depressive symptoms. Methods：33 inpatients and 70 outpatients diagnosed as major depressive disorder or depressive episode of bipolar I disorder according to the DSM-IV criteria were assessed with K-HDRS, Clinical Global Impression score(CGI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Montgomery-&Aring;berg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Results：Internal consistency (Cronhach’s alpha coefficeint=0.76) and interrater reliability (r=0.94, p<0.001) were statistically significant. Principal axis factoring analysis revealed 4 factors that accounted for 50.4% of the total variance. The correlations of K-HDRS with CGI, BDI and MADRS were 0.84, 0.54, 0.58 respectively. Conclusion：These results showed that the K-HDRS could be a reliable and valid tool for the assessment of depressive Korean patients. The K-HDRS will be a useful tool for assessing depressive symptoms in Korea.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. "Center for CognitiveTherapy" (1978), The Beck Depression scale
  2. "Beck DepressionInventory의 표준화 연구-정상 집단을 중심으로(I)", 25, pp.487~502 (1986)
  3. "Olderage and the underreporting of depressive symptoms", 43, pp.216~221 (1995)
  4. "The relations between observer-rating and self-reportof depressive symptomatology", 5(3), pp.350~360 (1993)
  5. "What factors predict discrepancies betweenself and observer ratings of depression", 31, pp.253~259 (1994)
  6. "A rating scale for depression", 23, pp.56~62
  7. "Development of a rating scale for primary depressiveillness", 6, pp.278~296 (1967)
  8. "Psychological Testing" (1982), Macmillan
  9. "해밀턴 우울증 평가척도의 요인구조", 12, pp.3~16 (2003)
  10. "Culture as a confounding variable", 158, pp.133~
  11. "AssessmentManual for psychopharmacology", pp.223~244 (1976)
  12. "A new depression scale designed to besensitive to change", pp.382~389
  13. "A structured interview guide for Hamilton DepressionRating Scale", 45, pp.742~747 (1978)
  14. "Style of verbal expression of emotional andphysical experiences:a study of depressed patients and normal controlsin China", 10, pp.231~243 (1986)
  15. "Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the HamiltonDepression Rating Scale", 42(2), pp.161~165 (2001)
  16. "Validityand reliability of the Chinese Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.Br J Psychiatry", 152, pp.660~664
  17. "changes in scoresas a function of training and version used", pp.1 21~2 29, The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
  18. "Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry", pp.892~913 (1989)
  19. "Assessing depression in primarycare practice with the Beck depression inventory and the Hamiltonrating scale for depression", 7(1), pp.59~65 (1995)
  20. "Assessment of depression:a comparisonof rating scales", 11, pp.245~253 (1986)
  21. "Quantitativerating of depressive states", 51, pp.161~170 (1975)
  22. "A comparison between the Hamilton RatingScale and the Beck Inventory in the measurement of depression", 128, pp.486~489 (1976)
  23. "Factor study of the Hamilton Rating Scale forDepression and the Bech Melancholia Scale", 82, pp.178~181
  24. "A new validation of theHamilton Rating Scale for Depression", 22, pp.21~8 (1988)
  25. "Factorial structure and factor reliability of theHamilton Rating Scale for Depression", 78, pp.113~120 (1988)
  26. "Psychopathologicaldimensions of depression:a factor study of the 17-itemHamilton depression rating scale in unipolar depressed outpatients", 68, pp.41~47 (2002)
  27. "Factorialstructure of the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale", 92, pp.168~172 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

자기보고식 해밀턴 우울척도의 문항특성고진경, 김창윤, 노은여대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2002 · 제41권 제5호한글판 Montgomery-Åsberg 우울증 평가 척도의 표준화 연구강민희, 김도훈, 김용식, 김정란, 신정호, 신현균, 안용민, 연병길, 이규영, 이종훈, 이중서, 정상근, 조인희, 표경식, 한선호대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2005 · 제44권 제4호한국형 기분장애 질문지의 타당화 연구박원명, 신영철, 윤보현, 전덕인, 정한용, 하규섭대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2005 · 제44권 제5호한국판 해밀턴 우울증평가척도(K-HDRS)의 확인적 요인 분석김도관, 김지혜, 박혜원, 유범희, 이동수, 이은호대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2009 · 제48권 제1호한국우울증척도의 개발이민규, 이민수대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2003 · 제42권 제4호한국판 양성 및 음성증후군 척도(Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale)의 신뢰도와 타당도구영진, 김광수, 김승현, 김용식, 박영환, 신현균, 안석균, 안용민, 윤도준, 이중서, 이지연, 조경형, 조인희, 주연호대한신경정신의학회 · 신경정신의학2001 · 제40권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)

대한신경정신의학회 '장기발전계획 테스크 포스팀' 활동 보고권준수pp. 387-388대한신경정신의학회 정책 연구소의 설립 제안이해국, 채정호pp. 389-396대한신경정신의학회 정책개발 연구최종혁, 김병창, 이영문pp. 397-415대한신경정신의학회 회칙 개정에 대한 제언박종익, 이중서pp. 416-419한신경정신의학회 연구학회의 발전방향김재진, 권준수, 전양환, 김찬형pp. 420-424
원문 보기