한국판 WEMWBS의 타당화 연구
A Validation Study of the Korean Version of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale
2
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives The aim of this study was to develop the Korean version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (K-WEMWBS) and to examine its factorial structure, reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity. Methods In this study, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), a self-rating measure for assessment of mental well-being, was translated into Korean. It was completed by 222 respondents, including 117 healthy subjects and 105 psychiatric patients from both inpatient and outpatient clinics at Soonchunhyang University Hospitals in Bucheon, Cheonan, and Seoul. Results The K-WEMWBS showed good content validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a single factor structure. The Cronbach’s alpha value for the K-WEMWBS was 0.944, which demonstrated good internal consistency. Test-retest reliability at 2–8 weeks was high (0.789). The K-WEMWBS showed high correlations with mental health, positive affect, and quality of life scales. Moderate negative correlation was observed between the K-WEMWBS and the negative affect scale. Discriminant validity was partially identified. Statistically significant differences in scores were observed between the psychiatric patient group and the control group. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that the K-WEMWBS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment of mental well-being, particularly the positive aspects of mental health.
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to develop the Korean version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (K-WEMWBS) and to examine its factorial structure, reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity. Methods In this study, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), a self-rating measure for assessment of mental well-being, was translated into Korean. It was completed by 222 respondents, including 117 healthy subjects and 105 psychiatric patients from both inpatient and outpatient clinics at Soonchunhyang University Hospitals in Bucheon, Cheonan, and Seoul. Results The K-WEMWBS showed good content validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a single factor structure. The Cronbach’s alpha value for the K-WEMWBS was 0.944, which demonstrated good internal consistency. Test-retest reliability at 2–8 weeks was high (0.789). The K-WEMWBS showed high correlations with mental health, positive affect, and quality of life scales. Moderate negative correlation was observed between the K-WEMWBS and the negative affect scale. Discriminant validity was partially identified. Statistically significant differences in scores were observed between the psychiatric patient group and the control group. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that the K-WEMWBS is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment of mental well-being, particularly the positive aspects of mental health.
참고문헌 (21)
- 조소현, "‘마음건강’ 척도의 개발", 신경정신의학, 50(2), pp.116~124 (2011), 대한신경정신의학회
- World Health Organization, "The World Health Report 2001: Mental Health. New Understanding, New Hope", New Understanding, ~ (2001)
- Vaingankar JA, "From well-being to positive mental health: conceptualization and qualitative development of an instrument in Singapore", Qual Life Res, 21, pp.1785~1794 (2012)
- Costanza R, "Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being", Ecol Econ, 61, pp.267~276 (2007)
- Gasper D, "Understanding the diversity of conceptions of well-being and quality of life", J Socio Econ, 39, pp.351~360 (2010)
- McDowell I., "Measures of self-perceived well-being", J Psychosom Res, 69, pp.69~79 (2010)
- Tennant R, "The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation", Health Qual Life Outcomes, 5, pp.63~ (2007)
- Stewart-Brown S, "Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) User Guide Version 1" (2008), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick
- Keyes CL, "Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF)in setswana-speaking South Africans", Clin Psychol Psychother, 15, pp.181~192 (2008)
- Vaingankar JA, "The positive mental health instrument: development and validation of a culturally relevant scale in a multi-ethnic asian population", Health Qual Life Outcomes, 9, pp.92~ (2011)
- Kuyken W, "Quality of life assessment across cultures", Int J Ment Health, 23, pp.5~27 (1994)
- 임영진, "정신적 웰빙 척도(MHC-SF)의 한국어판 타당화 연구", 한국심리학회지:일반, 31(2), pp.369~386 (2012), 한국심리학회
- Campbell A, "Subjective measures of well-being", Am J Psychol, 31, pp.117~124 (1976)
- Min SK, "Development of Korean Version of WHO Quality of Life Scale Abbreviated Version (WHOQOL-BREF).", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 39, pp.571~579 (2000)
- 이현희, "한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도 (Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; PANAS)의 타당화 연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(4), pp.935~946 (2003), 한국임상심리학회
- Young-Jin Lim, "The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 7(3), pp.163~169 (2010), 대한신경정신의학회
- Min SK, "Korean version of WHOQOL" (2002), Hana Medical Publishing company
- Bentler P., "EQS for Windows User’s Guide" (1995), Multivariate Software Inc
- Kim KS, "AMOS 18.0 structural equation modeling" (2010), Hannarae Publishing company
- Kwon SM, "Positive Psychology" (2008), Hakjisa
- Bradburn NM, "The Structure of Psychological Well-Being" (1969), Aldine