한국어판 단축형 성격신념질문지의 타당화 연구
A Validation Study of Korean Version of Personality Beliefs Questionnaire-Short Form (PBQ-SF)
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ObjectivesZZThe Personality Belief Questionnaire-Short Form (PBQ-SF) is a self-report instrument for assessment of dysfunctional beliefs based on Beck’s cognitive formulations of personality disorders. The aims of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of PBQ-SF in clinical samples. MethodsZZThe Korean version of PBQ-SF was examined in 115 participants (50 patients with personality disorder and 65 patients without personality disorder). All participants were assessed for personality disorder using the semi-structured clinical interview of the Personality Assessment Schedule. The construction validity was examined by correlation with Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five-Factor Inventory neuroticism scales. Twenty four randomly sampled patients were examined for the test-retest reliability. ResultsZZThe Korean version of PBQ-SF showed good internal consistency [Cronbach’s alpha=0.73 (schizoid)-0.92 (paranoid)] and test-retest reliability [r=0.74 (narcissistic)-0.92 (paranoid)]. The PBQ-SF was correlated with depression, anxiety, and neuroticism. The overall subscales of PBQ-SF were correlated with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders based diagnosis of personality disorders. ConclusionZZConsistent with previous findings using the Korean full version of PBQ as well as the English version of PBQ-SF, our results support that the Korean version of PBQ-SF is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment of dysfunctional beliefs associated with personality pathology.
Abstract
ObjectivesZZThe Personality Belief Questionnaire-Short Form (PBQ-SF) is a self-report instrument for assessment of dysfunctional beliefs based on Beck’s cognitive formulations of personality disorders. The aims of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of PBQ-SF in clinical samples. MethodsZZThe Korean version of PBQ-SF was examined in 115 participants (50 patients with personality disorder and 65 patients without personality disorder). All participants were assessed for personality disorder using the semi-structured clinical interview of the Personality Assessment Schedule. The construction validity was examined by correlation with Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five-Factor Inventory neuroticism scales. Twenty four randomly sampled patients were examined for the test-retest reliability. ResultsZZThe Korean version of PBQ-SF showed good internal consistency [Cronbach’s alpha=0.73 (schizoid)-0.92 (paranoid)] and test-retest reliability [r=0.74 (narcissistic)-0.92 (paranoid)]. The PBQ-SF was correlated with depression, anxiety, and neuroticism. The overall subscales of PBQ-SF were correlated with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders based diagnosis of personality disorders. ConclusionZZConsistent with previous findings using the Korean full version of PBQ as well as the English version of PBQ-SF, our results support that the Korean version of PBQ-SF is a reliable and valid instrument for assessment of dysfunctional beliefs associated with personality pathology.
참고문헌 (21)
- Beck AT, "Dysfunctional beliefs discriminate personality disorders", Behav Res Ther, 39, pp.1213~1225 (2001)
- Bhar SS, "Beliefs and personality disorders: an overview of the personality beliefs questionnaire", J Clin Psychol, 68, pp.88~100 (2012)
- Beck AT, "The Personality Belief Questionnaire" (1991), University of Pennsylvania
- Beck AT, "Cognitive therapy of personality disorder" (1990), Guldford Press
- 조수덕, "성격 신념 질문지(Personality Belief Questionnaire)의 신뢰도와 타당도", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(4), pp.925~946 (2008), 한국임상심리학회
- Nelson-Gray RO, "A preliminary examination of Beck’s cognitive theory of personality disorders in undergraduate analogues", Pers Individ Differ, 36, pp.219~233 (2004)
- Fournier JC, "Dysfunctional cognitions in personality pathology: the structure and validity of the Personality Belief Questionnaire", Psychol Med, 42, pp.795~805 (2012)
- Connan F, "Personality disorder cognitions in the eating disorders", Behav Res Ther, 47, pp.77~82 (2009)
- Kuyken W, "Response to cognitive therapy in depression: the role of maladaptive beliefs and personality disorders", J Consult Clin Psychol, 69, pp.560~566 (2001)
- Butler AC, "The personality belief questionnaire-short form: development and preliminary findings", Cogn Ther Res, 31, pp.357~370 (2007)
- Tyrer P, "Classification of personality disorder", Br J Psychiatry, 135, pp.163~167 (1979)
- Tyrer P, "Personality assessment schedule: DSM-IV version. Unpublished manuscript" (2012), Imperial College London
- Beck AT, "An inventory for measuring depression", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 4, pp.561~571 (1961)
- Rhee MK, "A standardization study of Beck Depression Inventory I-Korean version (K-BDI): reliability and factor analysis", Korean J Psychopathol, 4, pp.77~95 (1995)
- Spielberger CD, "STAI Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (“Self-evaluation Questionnaire”)" (1970), Consulting Psycholigist Press
- Han DW, "A standardization study of Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)" (1993), Korean Psychological Association
- McCrare RR, "NEO Inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3)and NEO Personality Inventory-revised (NEO PI-R): professional manual", Psychological Assessment Resources, ~ (1992)
- Ahn CK, "Standardization of the Korean version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory", Korean J Counsel and Psychother, 9, pp.443~473 (1997)
- 김향희, "문항반응이론을 적용한한국판 보스톤 이름대기 검사 단축형(K-BNT-15) 개발", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 13(12), pp.321~327 (2013), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 윤선아, "한국판 분열형 성격장애 척도-단축형(Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief: SPQ-B)의 타당화 연구", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(2), pp.491~504 (2010), 한국임상심리학회
- Lim JS, "Reliability and validity of Korean version of Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised in a non-clinical sample", pp.2007