본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

뉴욕 주 사법입원 및 외래치료 지원제도에 대한 고찰

Review of Court-Ordered Treatment in New York State

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류정신과학

초록

In recent decades, laws for involuntary treatment have evolved in ways that protect human rights as well as public safety. Globally, many nations have legislation for psychiatric patients that provide procedural advocacy during their involuntary treatment while a court or another independent organization reviews its lawfulness. In contrast, people with severe mental illness in Korea risk encountering human rights violations and loss of timely treatment, because their involuntary admissions are primarily initiated by family members and civil doctors and not by courts or government. The Mental Health Promotion and Welfare Act, revised in 2016, does not address this fundamental weakness, instead restricting involuntary admission criteria and bypassing the implementation of any procedural assistance programs. Subsequently untreated patients lead to clinical aggravation and even serious felony offenses. This paper introduces New York State’s court-ordered treatment system via the Mental Hygiene Law as a model for the revision of Korean legislation. The findings show that involuntary admissions in New York State are initiated by many parties as well as familial relatives and may be held up to 60 days without any court order. However, patients are assigned legal counsel for the ability to request for a court hearing at any time during their admission. The Assisted Outpatient Program is another legal intervention that requires a person with a mental illness that would likely result in serious harm to self or others to receive supervised outpatient treatment. We argue that the New York State model can be implemented effectively in Korea considering its current medical and judicial status.

Abstract

In recent decades, laws for involuntary treatment have evolved in ways that protect human rights as well as public safety. Globally, many nations have legislation for psychiatric patients that provide procedural advocacy during their involuntary treatment while a court or another independent organization reviews its lawfulness. In contrast, people with severe mental illness in Korea risk encountering human rights violations and loss of timely treatment, because their involuntary admissions are primarily initiated by family members and civil doctors and not by courts or government. The Mental Health Promotion and Welfare Act, revised in 2016, does not address this fundamental weakness, instead restricting involuntary admission criteria and bypassing the implementation of any procedural assistance programs. Subsequently untreated patients lead to clinical aggravation and even serious felony offenses. This paper introduces New York State’s court-ordered treatment system via the Mental Hygiene Law as a model for the revision of Korean legislation. The findings show that involuntary admissions in New York State are initiated by many parties as well as familial relatives and may be held up to 60 days without any court order. However, patients are assigned legal counsel for the ability to request for a court hearing at any time during their admission. The Assisted Outpatient Program is another legal intervention that requires a person with a mental illness that would likely result in serious harm to self or others to receive supervised outpatient treatment. We argue that the New York State model can be implemented effectively in Korea considering its current medical and judicial status.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 박종익, "강제입원과 관련된 입원적합성심사위원회의 법적 의미에 대한 고찰", 신경정신의학, 58(1), pp.38~46 (2019), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
  2. 윤제식, "정신건강복지법 비판 : 비자의 입원 요건을 중심으로", 신경정신의학, 57(2), pp.145~156 (2018), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
  3. Research institute for Healthcare Policy, "Revision of the Mental Health and Welfare Act for the respect of human rights and deinstitutionalization" (2018), Korean Medical Association
  4. "Decision of the unconstitutionality appeal of Mental Health Act Article 24(1)"[URL]
  5. National mental health statistics 2018, "National Center for Mental Health", National Center for Mental Health, ~ (2020)
  6. Salize HJ, "Epidemiology of involuntary placement of mentally ill people across the European Union", Br J Psychiatry, 184, pp.163~168 (2004)
  7. 이정기, "정신질환 범죄에 대한 검토와 법률적·제도적 개선방안 - 조현병과 관련지어 -", 법학연구, 19(3), pp.85~105 (2019), 한국법학회
  8. Shin K, "The enforcement and legislative evaluation of Mental Health and Welfare Act", Journal of Legislative Evaluation, 13, pp.15~58 (2018)
  9. 윤제식, "정신건강복지법의 문제점과 개선방안 : 외부 기관 추가 전문의 진단 제도 및 입원적합성심사위원회의 역할을 중심으로", 신경정신의학, 56(4), pp.146~153 (2017), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
  10. 박종익, "역사적 관점에서 본 정신보건법 전부개정법률에 대한 검토", 신경정신의학, 56(1), pp.1~9 (2017), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
  11. 김혜수, "강제입원의 법적 기준에 대한 고찰 : 입원적합성 심사에참고할 해외 사례의 소개를 포함하여", 신경정신의학, 57(1), pp.43~51 (2018), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
  12. 조근호, "동아시아 4개국의 비자의 입원 관련 정신보건법 비교", 신경정신의학, 58(4), pp.297~313 (2019), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
  13. Lee MW, "The background of the discussion on the introduction of the judicial involuntary admission for the mental patients: issues and tasks", Issues and Perspectives, 1567 (2019)
  14. "Principles for the protection of persons with mental illness and the improvement of mental health care"[URL]
  15. 제철웅, "절차보조사업을 통한 정신장애인 당사자옹호서비스의 필요성과 내용", 법학논총, 35(2), pp.1~31 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
  16. Lee MW, "Involuntary admission system of the mental patients", Legislative Impact Analysis, 42 (2019)
  17. "Mental Hygiene Law"[URL]
  18. Swanson JW, "The cost of assisted outpatient treatment: can it save states money?", Am J Psychiatry, 170, pp.1423~1432 (2013)
  19. Meldrum ML, "Implementation status of assisted outpatient treatment programs : a national survey", Psychiatr Serv, 67, pp.630~635 (2016)
  20. "Patients outside hospital’ are still neglected though recent legislations" (2019)[URL]
  21. 박인환, "미국의 외래치료명령제도 및 위기대응과 국내적 시사점", 의료법학, 19(1), pp.23~80 (2018), 대한의료법학회[DOI]
  22. Scull A, "Madness in civilization: a cultural history of insanity, from the bible to Freud, from the madhouse to modern medicine" (2015), Princeton University Press
  23. Appelbaum PS, "Almost a revolution: mental health law and the limits of change" (1994), Oxford University Press
  24. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, "Civil Commitment and the Mental Health Care Continuum: historical trends and principles for law and practice" (2019), Office of the Chief Medical Officer; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  25. Federal Security Agency, "A draft act governing hospitalization of the mentally ill" (1952), US Government Printing Office
  26. Testa M, "Civil commitment in the United States", Psychiatry (Edgmont), 7, pp.30~40 (2010)
  27. Large MM, "The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts", J Med Ethics, 34, pp.877~881 (2008)
  28. Bureau of the Census United States, "Historical statistics of the United States, colonial times to 1970" (1975), US Government Printing Office
  29. Mental Health, "Center for Mental Health Services", US Government Printing Office, ~, pp.United States (DHHS Publ No SMA-92-1942) (1992)
  30. Sommer R, "The mentally ill in the Eighties", Journal of Orthomolecular Psychiatry, 10, pp.193~201 (1981)
  31. Swanson JW, "Costs of criminal justice involvement among persons with serious mental illness in connecticut", Psychiatr Serv, 64, pp.630~637 (2013)
  32. Stromberg CD, "A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill", Harvard J Legis, 20, pp.275~396 (1983)
  33. Anfang SA, "Civil commitment--the American experience", Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci, 43, pp.209~218 (2006)
  34. King EF, "Outpatient civil commitment in North Carolina : constitutional and policy concerns", Law Contemp Probl, 58, pp.251~281 (1995)
  35. Miller RD, "Outpatient civil commitment of the mentally ill : an overview and an update", Behav Sci Law, 6, pp.99~118 (1988)
  36. Swartz MS, "Assessing outcomes for consumers in New York’s Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program", Psychiatr Serv, 61, pp.976~981 (2010)
  37. Swanson JW, "Robbing Peter to pay Paul : did New York State’s outpatient commitment program crowd out voluntary service recipients", Psychiatr Serv, 61, pp.988~995 (2010)
  38. "State population totals and components of change: 2010-2019"[URL]
  39. "2010 Census urban and rural classification and urban area criteria"[URL]
  40. "Urban vitality division"[URL]
  41. Surles RC, "Redesigning emergency room psychiatry in New York", Adm Policy Ment Health, 22, pp.97~105 (1994)
  42. "Find a mental health program"[URL]
  43. Shea S, "The Mental Hygiene Legal Service at 50: a retrospective and prospective examination of advocacy for people with mental disabilities", Government, Law, and Policy Journal, 14, pp.35~41 (2012)
  44. Russ MJ, "Outcomes associated with court-ordered treatment over objection in an acute psychiatric hospital", J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 41, pp.236~244 (2013)
  45. Kwak N, "The U.S. involuntary civil commitment procedures and human rights protection system for persons with mental disorders", KNOU JOURNAL, 50, pp.1~30 (2010)
  46. "Suspect in Jinju slayings was dangerous but constantly overlooked"[URL]
  47. "The empowerment of legal service for the people"[URL]
  48. National mental health statistics–pilot study, "National Center for Mental Health", National Center for Mental Health, ~ (2018)
  49. Swartz MS, "New York state Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program evaluation" (2009), Duke University School of Medicine

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)