Comparing Open Educational Resource Practices in Higher Education between Finland and South Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper we are comparing how the OER (open educational resources) are developed in Higher Education in Finland and South Korea. We also present a comparison model for further studies. Essential findings based on our comparison are that in both countries there are many best practices of use of the OER and open learning. Open educational resources have great potential and their use can ensure quality teaching and learning. The activity has not inspired the great mass of higher education teachers in Finland and Korea. Traditionally, a teacher’s job is working alone, and so a new operational culture is required. Our comparison indicates that numerous questions, fears and problems and cultural differences are also related to the thematic. There is an evident need for a new kind of strategic leadership, a new kind of teaching and learning culture and a doing together and production ideology for the method to spread. Based on our study the following interlinked elements of OER seem to be pivotal: changes to pedagogies, technology and operational culture; educational policy intention; and attitude to culture. Lastly, comparison frame by OER practice model is developed.
Abstract
In this paper we are comparing how the OER (open educational resources) are developed in Higher Education in Finland and South Korea. We also present a comparison model for further studies. Essential findings based on our comparison are that in both countries there are many best practices of use of the OER and open learning. Open educational resources have great potential and their use can ensure quality teaching and learning. The activity has not inspired the great mass of higher education teachers in Finland and Korea. Traditionally, a teacher’s job is working alone, and so a new operational culture is required. Our comparison indicates that numerous questions, fears and problems and cultural differences are also related to the thematic. There is an evident need for a new kind of strategic leadership, a new kind of teaching and learning culture and a doing together and production ideology for the method to spread. Based on our study the following interlinked elements of OER seem to be pivotal: changes to pedagogies, technology and operational culture; educational policy intention; and attitude to culture. Lastly, comparison frame by OER practice model is developed.
참고문헌 (27)
- A review of the Open Educational Reseources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities, "Atkins, D. E", A William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, ~ (2007)
- Bonk, C. J., "The World is Open" (2009), Jossey-Bass
- "A Harvest Too Large? A framework for Educational Abundance, In A Basic Guide to Open Educational Resources (OER)" (2008)[URL]
- Engeström, Y., "Learning by Expanding" (1987), Orienta-Konsultit
- Hagel III, J., "The Power of Pull: How Small Moves, Smartly Made, Can Set Big Things in Motion" (2010), Baic Books
- Hakkarainen, K., "A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning", International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, pp.213~231 (2009)
- Herrington, J, "A Guide to Authentic e-Learning" (2010), Routledge
- Iiyoshi, T., "Opening up Education", pp.89~103 (2008), The MIT Press
- Im, Y., "Copyright issues in designing contents from the viewpoint of educational technology", Workshop for vitalizing the usage of work (educational material) in cyber universities (2011), Korea Council for Online Universities
- The 2011 Horizon Report, "Johnson, L.", The New Media Consortium, ~ (2011)
- "KOCW (Korea Open CourseWare)" (2011)[URL]
- Kwak, D., "A Study on Vision Strategy for Ubiquitous Learning National System Construction", Presidential Council for Future and Vision (2010)
- Lee, S. D., "The Gates Are Shut: Technical and Cultural Barriers to Open Education, In Opening Up Education", pp.47~59 (2008), The MIT Press
- "Hyvässä kasvussa–Yhdessä kehittä- en kohti ammattikorkeakoulujen laadukasta verkko-opetusta. (Growing well – Developing together towards quality university of applied sciences online education)" (2008)[URL]
- Leppisaari, I., "Reflections on creating an international virtual benchmarking model for authentic e-learning: Crossing boundaries and breaking down barriers", Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corpo rate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp.950~959 (2009), AACE
- Lewis, D., "Virtual Learning Communities" (2005), Open University Press
- Meyerson, D., "Swift Trust and Temporary Groups", In R. M, ~ (1996)
- Kramer, "Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research", pp.166~195, SagePublications
- Ministry of Education, "The Evaluation of Virtual University Functions, In Reports of the Ministry of Education", pp.48~ (2007), Helsinki University Print
- "MITopencourseware(2011)" (2011)[URL]
- Nonaka, I., "The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation" (1995), Oxford University Press
- "Shifting Focus to Open Educational Practices" (2011)[URL]
- Paavola, S., "From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts – A trialogical approach to CSCL", Computer supported collaborative learning Practices: Proceedings of the 9th international conference of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, pp.83~92 (2009), InternationalSociety of the Learning Sciences
- Peters, L. M, "Identifying antecedents of virtual team collaboration", Team Performance Management, 13(3, pp.4) (2007), 117~129
- Scardamalia, M, "Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology, In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences", pp.97~115 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Sobrero, P. S, "Essential Components for Successful Virtual Learning Communities", Journal of Extensions, 46(4) (2008)
- Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries, "UNESCO.", UNESCO, ~ (2002)