Analysis of the Impact of Students’ Perception of Course Quality on Online Learning Satisfaction
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the early 2020, COVID-19 changed the traditional way of teaching and learning. This paper aimed to explore the impact of college students' perception of course quality on their online learning satisfaction. A total of 4,812 valid samples were extracted, and the difference analysis and hierarchical regression analysis were used to make an empirical analysis of college students' online learning satisfaction. The research results were as follows. Firstly, there was no difference in online learning satisfaction among students by gender and grade. Secondly, learning assessment, course materials, course activities and learner interaction, and course production had a significant positive impact on online learning satisfaction. Course overview and course objectives had an insignificant correlation with online learning satisfaction. Thirdly, the total effect of online learning satisfaction was as follows. Course production had the greatest effect, followed by course activities and student-student interactions, followed by course materials. It was the learning evaluation that showed the least effect. This study can provide empirical reference for college teachers on how to continuously improve online teaching and increase students' satisfaction with online learning.
Abstract
In the early 2020, COVID-19 changed the traditional way of teaching and learning. This paper aimed to explore the impact of college students' perception of course quality on their online learning satisfaction. A total of 4,812 valid samples were extracted, and the difference analysis and hierarchical regression analysis were used to make an empirical analysis of college students' online learning satisfaction. The research results were as follows. Firstly, there was no difference in online learning satisfaction among students by gender and grade. Secondly, learning assessment, course materials, course activities and learner interaction, and course production had a significant positive impact on online learning satisfaction. Course overview and course objectives had an insignificant correlation with online learning satisfaction. Thirdly, the total effect of online learning satisfaction was as follows. Course production had the greatest effect, followed by course activities and student-student interactions, followed by course materials. It was the learning evaluation that showed the least effect. This study can provide empirical reference for college teachers on how to continuously improve online teaching and increase students' satisfaction with online learning.
참고문헌 (61)
- Alizadeh, M., "Evaluating a blended course for Japanese learners of English : Why quality matters", International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), pp.1~21 (2019)
- Allen, I. E., "Class differences: Online education in the United States" (2010), Sloan Consortium
- Baran, E., "Transforming online teaching practice : Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers", Distance Education, 32(3), pp.421~439 (2011)
- Bervell, B., "Towards a model for online learning satisfaction (MOLS): Re-considering non-linear relationships among personal innovativeness and modes of online interaction", Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), pp.236~259 (2020)
- Borup, J., "The nature of adolescent learner interaction in a virtual high school setting", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), pp.153~167 (2013)
- 채완순, "포스트코로나 시대 대비, 학습이론을 통한 고등교육 온라인 학습 환경의 학습만족도 향상전략 탐색", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 21(5), pp.797~815 (2021), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- Chen, W., "Implementation situation and reflection on online teaching in Double First-Cass universities", Edcation science, 36(2), pp.24~ (2020)
- Chen, X., "Reconstruction of curriculum teaching quality evaluation system and construction of “golden course”", China University Teaching, (5), pp.43~48 (2019)
- Chitkushev, L., "Digital learning impact factors : Student satisfaction and performance in online courses", International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(4), pp.356~ (2014)
- "FD-QM Higher Education Online Course Quality Standard" (2017)[URL]
- "Introduction to FD-QM" (2019)[URL]
- Diekelmann, N., "Being a supportive presence in online courses : Attending to students' online presence with each other", Journal of Nursing Education, 44(9), pp.393~395 (2005)
- Eom, S. B., "The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update", Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), pp.185~215 (2016)
- Eom, S. B., "The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation", Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), pp.215~235 (2006)
- Fang, X., "Research on the satisfaction of MOOC learner support service based on structural equation model", Open Education Research, (5), pp.76~85 (2016)
- Gallien, T., "Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online course room : Does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance and perceived connectedness with the instructor?", International Journal on E-learning, 7(3), pp.463~476 (2008)
- Gong, S., "The relationships among task value, academic emotions and online learning satisfaction", e-Education Research, 37(3), pp.72~77 (2016)
- Guo, L., "Research on the influencing mechanism of college students learning satisfaction with MOOCs", Journal of Higher education research, 12, pp.69~75 (2018)
- Hanna, D. E., "Practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials of web-based education" (2000), Atwood Publishing
- Hara, N., "Students' frustrations with a web-based distance education course", Communication & Society, 3(4), pp.557~579 (1999)
- Hoffman, G. L., "Using the quality matters rubric to improve online cataloging courses", Cataloging & classification quarterly, 50(2-3), pp.158~171 (2012)
- Hu, Y., "Theoretical analysis model and measurement of online learning effectiveness", e-Education Research, 36(10), pp.37~45 (2015)
- Ismuratova, G. S., "E-learning : Concept and its main characteristics", International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2), pp.847~852 (2017)
- Jackson, M. J., "Student perceptions of hybrid courses : Measuring and interpreting quality", Journal of Education for Business, 84(1), pp.7~12 (2008)
- Jeffery, S. D., "An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning", The Internet and Higher Education, 21(1), pp.100~122 (2013)
- 정승민, "코로나19로 시행된 원격수업에 대한 2년제 대학생과 4년제 대학생의 만족도 차이 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 21(5), pp.276~284 (2021), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- Jones, I. S., "Student perceptions of online courses", Research in Higher Education Journal, 32, pp.1~9 (2017)
- Kaiser, H. F., "An index of factorial simplicity", Psychometrika, 39(1), pp.31~36 (1974)
- 김명연, "EBS 수능강의 서비스 활용이 국어 학업성취도 및 수업태도에 미치는 영향", 교육연구, 77, pp.9~34 (2020), 교육문제연구소[DOI]
- Kline, R. B., "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling" (2015), Guilford publications
- Kuo, Y. C., "Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses", The Internet and Higher Education, 20, pp.35~50 (2014)
- 이유진, "여가스포츠 참여자의 행복 결정요인: 위계적 회귀분석 적용", 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 43(1), pp.43~53 (2019), 한국여가레크리에이션학회[DOI]
- Legon, R., "Measuring the impact of the Quality Matters Rubric™: A discussion of possibilities", American Journal of Distance Education, 29(3), pp.166~173 (2015)
- Li, Y., "Model construction and empirical test of college students’ satisfaction with online learning during epidemic prevention and control period: based on the survey of 15 universities in Shanghai", Open Educ. Res, 26, pp.112~111 (2020)
- Liu, H, "Research on the evaluation of Chinese higher education students' satisfaction based on PLS-SEM", Doctor, pp.2011
- Liu, X., "Research on the influencing factors of college students’ satisfaction with online teaching", Journal of Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University, 36(9), pp.120~127 (2020)
- Lowenthal, P., "Student perceptions of online learning : An analysis of online course evaluations", American Journal of Distance Education, 29(2), pp.85~97 (2015)
- Mumford, S., "Pre-service language teachers reflection development through online interaction in a hybrid learning course", Computers & Education, 144, pp.1~25 (2020)
- Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric theory" (1978), McGraw-Hill
- Prior, D. D., "Attitude, digital literacy and self-efficacy : Flow-on effects for online learning behavior", The Internet and Higher Education, 29, pp.91~97 (2016)
- Qian, Y., "Factors affecting the continued use of online learning user behavior", Journal of Modern Information, 2015(3), pp.50~56 (2015)
- "Higher Ed Course Design Rubric" (2020)[URL]
- Ralston-Berg, P., "Students' perceptions of online course quality : How do they measure up to the research?", Internet Learning Journal, 4(1), pp.38~55 (2015)
- Ralston-Berg, P., "What makes a quality online course? The student perspective", Proceedings from the 24th annual conference on distance teaching and learning, pp.1~5 (2008)
- Roach, V., "Satisfaction with online learning: A comparative descriptive study", Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), pp.317~332 (2006)
- "Can technology genuinely reduce teacher workload?" (2016)[URL]
- Saadé, R. G., "The emotional state of technology acceptance", Science & Information Technology, 2006(3), pp.529~539 (2006)
- Sener, J., "Student satisfaction with online learning: An expanding universe", Elements of quality online education : Practice and direction, 4, pp.245~260 (2003)
- Shattuck, K., "Focusing research on quality matters", American Journal of Distance Education, 29(3), pp.155~158 (2015)
- Sheng, D., "On the index model of teaching perceived quality and classroom teaching satisfaction", China Science and technology information, (23), pp.260~261 (2009)
- Stevens, J. P., "Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences" (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Su, H., "Study on users, willingness to continue using online teaching platform under the epidemic situation-based on customer value theory", Journal of Hubei Radio & Television University, 41(03), pp.29~35 (2021)
- Swan, K., "Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses", Distance education, 22(2), pp.306~331 (2001)
- Wang, N., "The analysis of influencing factors on learning satisfaction in open education network courses", Open Education Research, 20(6), pp.111~118 (2014)
- Wei, H. C., "Online learning performance and satisfaction : do perceptions and readiness matter?", Distance Education, 41(1), pp.48~69 (2020)
- Xie, Y., "Research on the structure, influencing factors and training strategies of college students' e-learning self-efficacy", e-Education Research, (10), pp.30~34 (2011)
- Xu, X., "Factors influencing college students’ satisfaction in online learning", Distance Education in China, (5), pp.43~50 (2017)
- Yang, Li., "Study on college students’ online learning satisfaction and analysis of the influencing factors during COVID-19: A case study of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications", Jiangsu Science & Technology Information, (30), pp.51~56 (2020)
- Zhang, B., "An empirical research on students' satisfaction levels regarding undergraduate teaching quality: The perspectives of student expectations and student perceptions of quality", Fudan Education Forum, (04), pp.59~65 (2014)
- Zheng, L., "An empirical study on the effect of teacher guidance on collaborative learning", e-Education Research, 35(8), pp.89~94 (2014)
- Zuo, Q., "Demand of online course teachers' teaching ability based on “student satisfaction model”", China Poultry, 43(3), pp.118~ (2021)
