본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Reasons for Excessive Delegation related to the Social Security Acts and its Effects on Social Policy in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Korean Assembly delegates authority to the governmental administration to regulate the most important components of social security programs. The excessive delegation is a rational choice on the side of Korean presentatives whose ultimate goal is to be nominated again and elected at the next general election. As Korean political parties adopt top-down methods to nominate a candidate and loyalty to the party leader is the pre-eminent criterion of candidate selection, representatives are not concerned about regulating the Social Security Acts in detail. In addition, the members of the standing committees of the Assembly must be reorganized every two years and their members often change committee. As a result, representatives delegate authority to the administration to regulate the aforementioned important components of social security programs. It leads to fail to develop social security programs.

Abstract

The Korean Assembly delegates authority to the governmental administration to regulate the most important components of social security programs. The excessive delegation is a rational choice on the side of Korean presentatives whose ultimate goal is to be nominated again and elected at the next general election. As Korean political parties adopt top-down methods to nominate a candidate and loyalty to the party leader is the pre-eminent criterion of candidate selection, representatives are not concerned about regulating the Social Security Acts in detail. In addition, the members of the standing committees of the Assembly must be reorganized every two years and their members often change committee. As a result, representatives delegate authority to the administration to regulate the aforementioned important components of social security programs. It leads to fail to develop social security programs.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Deyo, F. C., "The Political Economy of Social Policy Formation; East Asia’s Newly Industrialized Countries, In States and development in the Asian Pacific rim", pp.289~306 (1992), Sage
  2. 도회근, "정당의 공직선거후보자 추천제도 개선방안 연구", 헌법학연구, 17(2), pp.235~271 (2011), 한국헌법학회
  3. 길정아, "국회의원후보자 선정과정의 동학: 제18대 총선에서 한나라당과 통합민주당의 공천을 중심으로", 한국정치연구, 20(1), pp.291~316 (2011), 사회과학연구원 한국정치연구소
  4. Goodman, R., "the East Asian Welfare States: Peripatetic Learning, Adaptive Change, and Nation-Building, In Welfare State in Transition, National Adaptations in Global Economies", pp.192~224 (1996), Sage
  5. Holliday, I., "Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia", Political Studies, 48, pp.706~723 (2000)
  6. Jeon, Y.J., "Democratizing Candidate Selection in Korea: Issues and Alternatives", Journal of Modern Politics Studies, 3, pp.37~69 (2010)
  7. Jones, C., "Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan: Oikonomic Welfare States", Government and Opposition, 25(4), pp.446~462 (1990)
  8. Jones, C., "The Pacific challenge; Confucian welfare states, In New perspectives on the welfare state in Europe", pp.198~217 (1993), Routledge
  9. Jung, M.K, "The Case of Pesion and Medical Insuracne Politics under the Yushin Regime: State Autonomy, State Capacity, and Social Security Policy", Korean Public Administration Review, 27(20), pp.493~516 (1993)
  10. Kim, E.C., "A Study on the Committee System of National Assembly", pp.2002
  11. Kim, H.W., "The Korean National Assembly" (2010), KCI
  12. Kim, Y.S., "Public Assistant Program, In Social Policy Making Process in Korea" (2008), Nanam
  13. Korpi, W., "New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries 1975-1995", American Political Science Review, 97(3), pp.425~446 (2003)
  14. Kwon, H.J., "The Welfare State in Korea: The Politics of Legitimation" (1999), Macmillan
  15. Lee, S.Y., "Südkoreanische Sozialpolitik im politischen Systemwechsel vom bürokratischen Autoritarismus zur delegativen Demokratie" (2007), Peter Lang
  16. 이신용, "권위주의 국가와 사회복지정책: 한국의 관료적 권위주의를 중심으로이신용", 사회복지정책, (28), pp.105~139 (2007), 한국사회복지정책학회
  17. 이신용, "민주화와 사회보장법 규율구조와의 관계", 사회복지정책, 36(3), pp.31~53 (2009), 한국사회복지정책학회
  18. 이현우, "국회 상임위원회의 운영: 전문성과 대표성의 재평가", 의정연구, 15(1), pp.145~176 (2009), 한국의회발전연구회
  19. Luhmann, Niklas, "Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat" (1981), Olzog
  20. Ministry of Employment and Labor, "The Annals of Industrial Accident Insurance in 2010", ~ (2011)
  21. Ministry of Employment and Labor, "Employment Insurance White Paper in 2011" (2011)
  22. Park, C.P., "A Comparative Study on Specialization of the Legislatures among U.S.A, Japan and Korea", Journal of Korean Political Science Association, 30(4), pp.322~342 (1997)
  23. 박찬표, "국회위원회제도의 이론적 탐색과 개선방안", 헌법학연구, 10(3), pp.75~107 (2004), 한국헌법학회
  24. 박상철, "정당공천의 헌법적 쟁점과 개선방향 - 국회의원 공천제도의 비교법적 분석 -", 공법학연구, 9(2), pp.113~138 (2008), 한국비교공법학회
  25. Rieger, E., "Wohlfahrtsstaat und Sozialpolitik in Ostasien. Der Einfluss von Religion im Kulturvergleich, In Globalisierung. Ökonomische und soaziale Herausforderungen am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts. Soziale Welt. Sonderband 13", pp.413~499 (1999), Nomos
  26. Schimdt, M.G., "Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Politik in jungen Demokratien, In Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Politik in jungen Demokratie" (2004), Verlag für Sozaialwissenschaften
  27. 서복경, "국회 위원회제도의 기원에 관한 연구: 제헌국회 및 2대국회를 중심으로", 의정논총, 5(1), pp.51~80 (2010), 한국의정연구회
  28. Shin, D.M., "Social and Economic Policies In Korea 1960-Present: the Dynamics of Ideas, Networks, and Linkages" (2000), The British Library
  29. "Statute of the Republic of Korea"[URL]
  30. White, G., "The politics of welfare in East Asia, In Governance in the Asia-Pacific", pp.195~220 (1998), The Open University

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)