본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

연마재 워터젯을 활용한 처분터널 내 콘크리트 플러그 절삭

Concrete plug cutting using abrasive waterjet in the disposal research tunnel

김건영|전형우|이항로|차요한|홍은수
사단법인 한국터널지하공간학회 (Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association)|2022.03|한국터널지하공간학회 논문집 (Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association)|제24권 제2호|pp. 153-170|DOI https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2022.24.2.153

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

연마재 워터젯처분터널플러그콘크리트 절삭Disposal tunnelPlugAbrasive watejetConcrete cutting
주제분류토목공학

초록

워터젯은 콘크리트와 암석 절삭에 적합하며 소음과 진동이 적어 도심지 시공에 널리 활용되는 기술이다. 최근 한국원자력연구원은 처분터널 내 공학적방벽의 열-수리-역학적 복합거동 현장시험의 콘크리트 플러그를 교란 및 손상 없이 해체하기 위해 연마재 워터젯 기술을 채택 및 적용하였다. 본 연구에서는 플러그 해체를 통한 연마재 워터젯의 터널 내 적용성을 평가하였고, 절삭 결과를 개발된 절삭 모델 결과와 비교하였다. 현장 적용성에 관해서는, 워터젯 활용은 경로선택이 용이하였으며 주변부의 추가적인 교란을 발생시키지 않았다. 펌프의 소음은 공회전 시 64.9 dB로 국내 생활소음 ‧ 진동의 규제기준을 만족하였으나 공중 분사 및 절삭 시에는 터널 내에서 측정되어 그 기준을 상회한 것으로 나타났다. 절삭모델 검증을 위해 연마재 워터젯의 반복 절삭, 유량, 연마재 투입량 및 이격거리를 주요 변수로 선정하였고 절삭 모델로 계산된 절삭 부피와 측정된 부피의 오차는 1회 절삭 시 12~13%, 2회 절삭 시 16%를 보였다. 절삭 깊이와 폭은 이격거리에 큰 영향을 받았으며, 이격거리가 작을수록 오차가 감소하는 경향을 보였다.

Abstract

Waterjet has been comprehensively used in urban areas owing to a suitable technique for cutting concrete and rock, and low noise and vibration. Recently, the abrasive waterjet technique has been adopted and applied by the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute to demolish concrete plugging without disturbing and damagingIn-situ Demonstration of Engineered Barrier System in the disposal research tunnel. In this study, the use of abrasive waterjet in the tunnel was evaluated for practical applicability and the existing cutting model was compared with the experimental results. As a variable for waterjet cutting, multi-cutting, water flow rate, abrasive flow rate, and standoff distance were selected for the diversity of analysis. As regarding the practical application, the waterjet facilitated path selection for cutting the concrete plugging and prevented additional disturbances in the periphery. The pump’s noiseat idling was 64.9 dB which is satisfied with the noise regulatory standard, but it exceeded the standard at ejection to air and target concrete because the experiment was performed in the tunnel space. The experimental result showed that the error betweenthe predicted and measured cutting volume was 12~13% for the first cut and 16% for second cut. The standoff distance had a significant influence on the cutting depth and width, and the error tended to decrease with decrement of standoff distance.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Ahmed, S., "Enhancement of cutting quality of abrasive waterjet by using multipass cutting strategy", Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 60, pp.530~543 (2020)
  2. Cha, Y., "The state of abrasive waterjet technologies for construction in Korea", Proceedings of the 6th International Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference, 09, pp.86~87 (2017)
  3. Cha, Y., "Waterjet erosion model for rock-like material considering properties of abrasive and target materials", Applied Sciences, 9(20), pp.4234~ (2019)
  4. Cha, Y., "Effect of focus geometry on the hard rock cutting performance of an abrasive waterjet", Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, pp.1~13 (2020)
  5. Cha, Y., "Performance and reuse of steel shot in abrasive waterjet cutting of granite", Rock mechanics and Rock Engineering, 54, pp.1551~1563 (2021)
  6. Chen, C., "Investigation into the water jet erosion efficiency of hydrate-bearing sediments based on the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Method", Applied Sciences, 9(1), pp.182~ (2019)
  7. El-Domiaty, A. A., "Fracture mechanics-based model of abrasive waterjet cutting for brittle materials", The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 13, pp.172~181 (1997)
  8. Engin, I. C., "Experimental and statistical evaluation of cutting methods in relation to specific energy and rock properties", Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 46(4), pp.755~766 (2013)
  9. Gostimirovic, M., "Evolutionary optimization of jet lag in the abrasive water jet machining", The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 101, pp.3131~3141 (2019)
  10. Haghbin, N., "Abrasive waterjet micro-machining of channels in metals:comparison between machining in air and submerged in water", International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 88, pp.108~117 (2015)
  11. Hashish, M., "A modeling study of metal cutting with abrasive waterjets", Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 106(1), pp.88~100 (1984)
  12. Hashish, M., "Pressure effects in abrasive-waterjet (AWJ) machining", Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 111(3), pp.221~228 (1989)
  13. Hlaváč, L. M., "Taper of kerfs made in rocks by abrasive water jet (AWJ)", The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88(1), pp.443~449 (2017)
  14. Hloch, S., "Noise evaluation at abrasive waterjet cutting of materials by means of factor analysis", Nonconventional Technologies Review, 1, pp.37~42 (2007)
  15. Huang, M., "Effects of a nano-silica additive on the rock erosion characteristics of a SC-CO2 jet under various operating conditions", Applied Sciences, 7(2), pp.153~ (2017)
  16. Literature review: noise from high pressure water jetting, "Hutt, R.", Health and Safety Laboratory, ~, pp.HSL (2004), 2004[DOI]
  17. Igarashi, S., "Microhardness testing of cementitious materials", Advanced Cement Based Materials, 4(2), pp.48~57 (1996)
  18. Jung, S. J., "Prediction of rock hardness and drillability using acoustic emission signatures during indentation", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining & Geomechanics Abstracts, 31(5), pp.561~567 (1994)
  19. Karakurt, I., "An experimental study on the depth of cut of granite in abrasive waterjet cutting", Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 27(5), pp.538~544 (2012)
  20. 김건영, "한국원자력연구원 지하처분연구시설(KURT) 현황과 장기 현장 시험", 한국자원공학회지, 54(4), pp.344~357 (2017), 한국자원공학회
  21. 최영철, "In-DEBS 현장시험 시스템 구축", Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology, 17, pp.45~63 (2019), 한국방사성폐기물학회[DOI]
  22. 김정규, "Slotting of Concrete and Rock Using an Abrasive Suspension Waterjet System", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(4), pp.571~578 (2012), 대한토목학회[DOI]
  23. Kim, J. K., "Effect of carbonation on the rebound number and compressive strength of concrete", Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(2), pp.139~144 (2009)
  24. Kim, K., "Relation between hardness and compressive strength of polymer concrete", Construction and Building Materials, 1(4), pp.209~214 (1987)
  25. Kumar, N., "Finite element analysis of multi-particle impact on erosion in abrasive water jet machining of titanium alloy", Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 236(18), pp.4600~4610 (2012)
  26. Momber, A.W., "The kinetic energy of wear particles generated by abrasive-water-jet erosio", Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 83(1-3), pp.121~126 (1998)
  27. Momber, A.W., "Effects of target material properties on solid particle erosion of geomaterials at different impingement velocities", Wear, 319(1-2), pp.69~83 (2014)
  28. Momber, A. W., "Principles of Abrasive Water Jet machining", pp.212~ (1997), Springer Science &Business Media
  29. Nanduri, M., "The effect of system and geometric parameters on abrasive water jet nozzle wear", International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(5), pp.615~623 (2002)
  30. Oh, T. M., "Rock cutting depth model based on kinetic energy of abrasive waterjet", Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 49(3), pp.1059~1072 (2016)
  31. 오태민, "워터젯 자유면을 이용한 암반발파 굴착공법의 효과", 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집, 15(1), pp.49~57 (2013), 사단법인 한국터널지하공간학회
  32. 오태민, "워터젯 절삭폭 중첩에 따른 암반제거 단면형상 분석", 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집, 23(3), pp.167~181 (2021), 사단법인 한국터널지하공간학회[DOI]
  33. Radvanská, A., "Technical possibilities of noise reduction in material cutting by abrasive water-jet", Strojarstvo, 51(4), pp.347~354 (2009)
  34. Ramulu, M., "The influence of abrasive water jet cutting conditions on the surface quality of graphite", epoxy laminate, 1994, pp.34(3), 295~313
  35. 송기일, "Precutting of Tunnel Perimeter for Reducing Blasting-Induced Vibration and Damaged Zone – Numerical Analysis", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(4), pp.1165~1175 (2014), 대한토목학회[DOI]
  36. Summers, D. A., "Waterjetting Technology", pp.8~12 (2003), CRC Press
  37. Susuzlu, T., "Initial research on the ultra-high pressure waterjet up to 700 MPa", Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 149(1-3), pp.30~36 (2004)
  38. Szilagyi, K., "Understanding the rebound surface hardness of concrete", Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(2), pp.185~192 (2015)
  39. Winslow, D. N., "A rockwell hardness test for concrete", Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, 6(2), pp.137~141 (1984)
  40. Yong, Z., "Effect of water mixture film on impact contact in abrasive waterjet machining", International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 39(6), pp.729~739 (1997)
  41. Zeng, J., "An erosion model of polycrystalline ceramics in abrasive waterjet cutting", Wear, 193(2), pp.207~217 (1996)
  42. Zhang, M., "Theoretical and finite element analysis of residual stress field for different geometrical features after abrasive waterjet peening", Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 141(1) (2019)
  43. Zhu, H. T., "Modeling material removal in fracture erosion for brittle materials by abrasive waterjet", Advanced Material Research, 76-78, pp.357~362 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

Plain waterjet cutting for concrete plug dismantling in disposal research tunnel김진섭, 오태민, 차요한, 황현중한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2025 · 제57권 제9호고압 워터젯에 의한 콘크리트의 표면 절삭 효율에 관한 실험 연구권영철, 김정규, 송재준, 여창현한국자원공학회 · 한국자원공학회지2010 · 제47권 제1호워터젯 절삭폭 중첩에 따른 암반제거 단면형상 분석박동엽, 박준식, 오태민, 조계춘사단법인 한국터널지하공간학회 · 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집2021 · 제23권 제3호터널굴착용 투입형 연마재 워터젯 시스템의 연마재 투입량과 유동성에 미치는 영향 인자오태민, 조계춘, 주건욱사단법인 한국터널지하공간학회 · 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집2014 · 제16권 제4호고강도 암반에서 수직구 기계굴착을 위한 연마재 워터젯 활용에 관한 연구류희환, 박준식, 오태민, 정주환, 조선아사단법인 한국터널지하공간학회 · 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집2023 · 제25권 제5호연마재 워터젯 암석절삭을 위한 결합 노즐의 기하학적 변수 영향오태민, 조계춘사단법인 한국터널지하공간학회 · 한국터널지하공간학회 논문집2012 · 제14권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

터널근접시공에 의한 말뚝의 거동을 고려한 플랫폼 기반의 예비 설계 가이드라인에 대한 연구전영진, 이규설, 바트보양, 이재철, 이철주pp. 129-151InSAR 기술을 이용한 지반침하분석 사례연구오형석, 문준식pp. 171-182터널구조물 정밀안전점검 및 정밀안전진단 개선방안 고찰김정흠, 이규필pp. 183-192신설터널의 위치에 따른 기존 병렬터널의 영향 분석윤지석, 김한얼, 정예림, 남경민, 조재은, 유한규pp. 193-215머신러닝 기법을 활용한 토압식 쉴드TBM 막장압 예측에 관한 연구권기범, 최항석, 김동구, 오주영pp. 217-230
원문 보기