본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

企業家活動과 일자리 창출에 대한 실증분석

Entrepreneurial Activity and Job Creation : An Empirical Evidence from Korean Regional Economy

3

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본고는 기업가의 창업활동과 고용간의 관계를 우리나라의 지역별 자료(7대 광역도시와 9개 도지역)를 대상으로 시초로 실증분석 하였다. 실증분석 결과를 다음과 같이 요약할 수 있다. 첫째, 실증분석 결과 우리나라에서도 미국, 영국 및 독일 등과 같이 기업가의 창업활동이 고용창출에 긍정적으로 기여하고 있음이 확인되었다. 또한 창업활동 과정에 대한 동태적인 효과도 선진국의 경우와 대체적으로 유사한 패턴임을 보여주었다. 둘째, 창업활동이 고용에 미치는 효과는 창업 형태의 종류(고용주 창업, 자영자 창업, 자영업자 창업) 및 대상지역에 따라 차별적으로 나타났다. 즉, 고용주 창업은 광역도시에서 일자리 창출에 더 효과적이었다. 반면에 비도시지역에선 자영자 및 자영업자 창업이 일자리 창출에 상대적으로 더 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 광역도시의 경우 비도시지역에 비하여 인적자본의 역할이 중요하게 추정되었다. 넷째, 기업규모와 고용창출 간에 정의 긴밀한 상관관계가 있었다. 기업규모가 큰 기업에서 일자리 창출이 더 효과적이었다. 이는 일자리 창출에는 중견기업의 육성이 중요함을 시사한다. 다섯째, 창업의 초기 및 중장기에 따라 고용창출 효과가 다르게 나타났다. 창업 초기에는 고용에 긍정적인 영향을 미치나 중기에는 진입효과로 말미암아 오히려 고용이 줄어드는 효과를 나타내고 있었다. 그러나 장기적인 총체적인 누적효과는 플러스로 나타났다. 이런 현상은 이미 미국, 영국 및 독일 등에서도 관찰되었던 현상이다. 따라서 고용증대를 위해선 중소기업의 창업정책도 단기적인 시각의 지원일변도에서 벗어나 중장기적으로 추가적인 일자리가 지속적으로 창출될 수 있도록 시장경제 주변 환경(규제완화 및 시장경제 인프라 정비 등)을 조성해주는 것이 필요함을 시사하고 있다.

Abstract

This paper explores that an effect of entrepreneurial activity(start-up) has impacted on job creation by employing Korean regional data. Such a study has been rarely reported in the literature in Korea, whereas a big bunch of researches stored in some OECD countries such as U.S.A., U.K., and Germany, etc. A contribution of this paper can be said to find first empirical evidence on positive relationships between entrepreneurial activity and employment in Korea. The hypothesis, higher entrepreneurial activity(or entrepreneurship), higher economic growth and more job creation, has been argued in the literature in recent. Under the hypothesis, countries(or area) associated with higher entrepreneurial activities may enjoy higher growth and more job opportunity. A famous economist, Schumpeter, already asserted entrepreneurs played a key role or creative destruction in economic development. Entrepreneurs who invented breakthrough technology or perceived a big potential profit opportunity may establish new firms, which leads to promotion of employment and productivity. A consolidated research team called Global Entrepreneurship Monitor(GEM) was launched in order to confirm the hypothesis that entrepreneurial activities might promote growth and employment in 1999. The GEM report showed that entrepreneurial activities have enhanced economic growth and created jobs in many countries such as U.S.A., U.K., Italy, Japan, Israel, etc. The result of the GEM project was very similar to the existing researches investigated by many pioneers such as Birch(1979), Davis et al.(1996), Acs et al.(1999), Davisson et al.(1999), Acs and Armington(2004), Audretsch and Keilbach(2004, 2005), Audretsch et al.(2006), SBA(1998, 1999, 2005), among others. Thus many governments of OECD countries have supported small and medium enterprises as an alternative deriving strategy to create new jobs and to stimulate economic development by encouraging new establishments after oil crisis in 1970s. The objective of this paper is to investigate via empirical estimation how entrepreneurial activity affects employment in Korea by using Korean regional data. According to the empirical result, I found that entrepreneurial activity has created job opportunity in Korea as done in the foreign countries such as U.S.A., U.K., and Germany, Netherland, among other countries. According to my research, the entrepreneurial activity(establishment) has impacted differentially on promoting employment by regions. That is, the job creation opportunity made by establishment with employees was greater in metropolitan area than in rural area. Such a result seems to be closely related to the structural status. That is, the ratio of start-ups with employees to the regional population was shown higher portion in metropolitan area than in non-metropolitan(rural) area. While the opportunity of job creation from the establishment without employees was shown greater in rural area rather than in metropolitan area. Theoretical rationale how entrepreneurial activity stimulates employment opportunity is provided and its empirical model is also derived. The empirical model is derived from the representative firm's profit maximization function, including the entrepreneurial activity variable in the production function. From the first order condition of the profit maximization, labor demand function is constructed as follows in terms of taking logarithm for each variable. [수식] (1) Where L; labor demand, w : real wage, E : entrepreneurial activity, H : human capital, D : regional aggregated demand, X : other control variables such as enterprise's size or agglomeration effect. The subscript ‘j' indicates region and ‘t' time series. In Eq.(1) I assumed that entrepreneurial activity is exogenous variable, which makes it possible to be estimated by reduced form equation. Establishment associated with entrepreneurial activity keeps long run influence on labor market : employment is increased at beginning stage of establishment but it will be offset partially at intermediate period because of the entry effect in the concerning market. Due to dynamic market's competition process, some enterprises will be bankrupted, which results in reducing employment opportunity. However, enterprises survived in the market will hire more employees to grasp more profit in the long run. Mueller et al.(2006) showed that entrepreneurial activity might affect differentiated impact on employment according the three dynamic stages : they called 'direct effect' for the beginning stage, ‘displacement effect' for the intermediate stage and 'induced effect' for the long run period. Therefore the total effect should be summed up the whole dynamic impacts accumulated. To incorporate the dynamic influence Almon lag model is additionally employed as follows. [수식] (2) Empirical equations (1) and (2) were estimated separately by using statistical software Eviews 5.0 program. Empirical model (1), based on the panel data, was estimated by employing fixed effect model of the panel data. Generally speaking, statistics(e.g., high R2 and t-statistics) related to regression and parameters of coefficient are shown good enough to be accepted safely. Most coefficients estimated are also shown appropriated signs consistent with theoretical rationale. A set of data employed in the empirical model is summarized as follows. Index of employees of the non-farm & forest and fishing industries taken logarithm is used as dependent variable. Several explanatory variables(taken logarithm) are used including labor forces, wage, number of establishments per 1000 regional population(proxy variable for entrepreneurial activity), human capital, R&D investment, enterprise's scale and agglomeration variable, regional income, and so on. I classified region into two groups or metropolitan area(7 big cities) and non-metropolitan(rural) area(9 provinces) from 1995 to 2005. One of the contributing points is to use appropriate proxy variable for the entrepreneurial activity. I used three types of entrepreneurial activity variables : (i) number of establishments with employees divided by regional population 15 years and over by region, (ii) number of establishments without employees divided by regional population 15 years and over by region, and (iii) combination of (i) and (ii) mentioned above. The main findings are summarized as follows. First, it was shown that entrepreneurial activity(start-up) has promoted employment in Korean and their pattern of dynamic impact process was very similar to the cases of foreign countries including U.S.A., U.K., Germany, Netherlands, etc. Second, entrepreneurial establishment has shown different pattern of impact on job creation by region : the higher entrepreneurial start-up area, the higher job creation. In addition, the entrepreneurial start-up’s impact was shown different types by regions. Urban cities have enjoyed higher job creation associated with higher entrepreneurial start-ups, in which establishment with employee was shown higher in metropolitan urban areas than in rural areas. Third, human capital is also shown important factor to create new jobs in metropolitan areas, which is consistent with existing researches. Fourth, job creation was positively related to firm's size. Large scaled firms survived in the market or new establishments with more employees at beginning stage usually creates more employment opportunity. It suggests that government had better support intermediate sized firms to promote the capacity of employment in Korea. At present, government has supported impartially small and medium sized enterprises regardless of firm's size. Fifth, dynamic impact process of the entrepreneurial start-up on job creation was shown variously according to the dynamic process stages(short-run, intermediate, and long-run). At the beginning stage the entrepreneurial impact on job creation was shown jump up trend, but its effect diminished over time, and its impact increased again in the long-run, implying that firms survived in the market enhanced their competitiveness and, in turn, create more jobs.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. 금재호, "자영업 고용구조의 변화와추이" (2005), 한국노동연구원
  2. 김기승, "자영업에 관한 유인가설과 구축가설에 대한 검증: 월간 단기패널을 이용한 실즐분석", 국제경제연구, 12(2), pp.163~189 (2006), 한국국제경제학회
  3. 김기태, "고용과 성장" (2009), 박영사
  4. 배종태, "기업가정신의 확장과 활성화", 중소기업연구, 31(1), pp.109~128 (2009), 한국중소기업학회
  5. 양현봉, "창업기업의 법인유지에 따른 애로해소와 비용절감 방안", e-KIET 산업경제정보, (428) (2009)
  6. 이윤재, "기업가정신과 경제성장의 관계 분석:GEM가설을 중심으로", 중소기업연구, 25(3), pp.105~128 (2003), 한국중소기업학회
  7. 이윤재, "企業家活動이 生産性에 미치는 效果", 경제학연구, 56(1), pp.5~29 (2008), 한국경제학회
  8. 이윤재, "미국내 한인 교포들의 자영업 실태 조사 연구" (2007), Hansa Research Institute
  9. 이주헌, "창업동기와 창업의사결정에 관한 연구", 중소기업연구, 30(1), pp.93~116 (2008), 한국중소기업학회
  10. 전병유, "자영업 선택의 결정 요인에 관한 연구", 노동경제논집, 26(3), pp.148~179 (2003), 한국노동경제학회
  11. Acs,Z, "Regional Innovation,Knowledge and Global Change" (2000), Pinter
  12. Missing Link : The Knowledge Filter and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth. in Economic Policy Research, "Acs,Z", Center for Economic Policy Research, ~, pp.Discussion Paper 4783 (2004)
  13. Acs,Z, "Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  14. Acs, Z, Z, "Entrepreneurship, Geography, and American Economic Growth" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  15. Acs,Z,Z., "Employment Growth and Entrepreneurial Activities in Cities", Regional Studies, 38(8), pp.911~927 (2004)
  16. Employment Effects of Business Dynamics : Mice, Gazelles, and Elephants, "Acs,Z,", Max Planck Institute of Economics, ~, pp.Working Paper 2306 (2006)
  17. Acs,Z, "Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  18. Acs,Z, "Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth and Public Policy", Small Business Economics, 28, pp.109~122 (2007)
  19. Audretsch,D., "Entrepreneurial Capital and Regional Growth", The Annals of Regional Science, 39, pp.457~469 (2005)
  20. Audretsch,D., "Entrepreneurship and Regional Growth : an Evolutionary Interpretation", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, pp.605~616 (2004)
  21. Audretsch,D., "Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth" (2006), Oxford University Press
  22. Audretsch,D., "Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth" (2006), Edward Elgar
  23. Entrepreneurship, Regional Development and Job Creation : The Case of Portugal, "Baptista,V.", Max Planck Institute of Economics, ~, pp.Working paper 0605 (2006)
  24. Baumol,W, "Entrepreneurship : Productive, Unproductive and Destructive", Journal of Political Economy, 98, pp.893~921 (1990)
  25. Birch,David L, "The Job Generation Process" (1979), MIT press
  26. Blanchflower,D.G., "What Makes and Entrepreneurs?", Journal of Labor Economics, 16, pp.26~60 (1998)
  27. Lag Structure of the Impact of Business Ownership on Economic Performance in OECD Countries, "Carree,M.", ~, pp.Max Plank working paper 0206 (2006)
  28. Calvo,G., "Technology, Entrepreneurs and Firm Size", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, pp.663~678 (1980)
  29. Carod,J., "New Business Formation and Employment Growth : Some Evidence for the Spanish Manufacturing Industry", Small Business Economics, 30, pp.73~84 (2008)
  30. Cotis,Jean-Philippe, "Entrepreneurship as an Engine for Growth : Evidence and Policy Challenges" (2007), GEM Forum
  31. Cowling, "Entrepreneurship and Unemployment : Relationships between Unemployment and Entrepreneurship in 37 Nations in GEM" (2002), GEM
  32. Davis,S., "Job Creation and Destruction" (1996), MIT
  33. Davisson,Per, "SMEs and Job Creation During a Recession and Recovery. in Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Macroeconomy" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  34. Evans,D.S., "An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice Under Liquidity Constraints", Journal of Political Economy, 97, pp.808~827 (1989)
  35. Fonseca,R., ""Entrepreneurship,Start-up costs and Employment", Entrepreneurship, Start-up costs and Employment,” European Economic Review, 45, pp.692~705 (2001)
  36. The Effect of New Business Formation on Regional Development over Time : The Case of Germany, "Fritsch,M.", Max Planck Institute of Economics, ~, pp.Working Paper 1906 (2006)
  37. Fritsch,M., "How does New Business Formation Affect Regional Develpoment? Introduction to the Special Issue", Small Business Economics, 30(1), pp.1~14 (2008)
  38. Garret,T., "Creating a Policy Environment for Entrepreneurs", Cato Journal, 26(3), pp.525~552 (2006)
  39. Does Entrepreneurship Create Enough Jobs in Europe? A Note. in Discussion Papers on Entrepreneurship, "Georgious,M", Marx Planck Institute of Economics, ~ (2008)
  40. Jovanovic,B, "Firm Formation with Heterogeneous Management and Labor Skills", Small Business Economics, 6, pp.185~191 (1994)
  41. Lucas,R.E, "On the Size Distribution of Business Firms", Bell Journal of Economics, 9, pp.508~23 (1978)
  42. Michellacci,C, "Low Returns in R&D to the Lack of Entrepreneurial Skills", The Eonomic Journal, 113, pp.207~225 (2003)
  43. The Effects of New Firm Formation on Regional Development over Time : The Case of Great Britain, "Mueller,P", Max Planck Institute of Economics, ~, pp.Working Paper 2406 (2006)
  44. Mueller,P, "Exploiting Entrepreneurial Opportunities : The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Growth", Small Business Economics, 28, pp.355~362 (2007)
  45. OECD, "Employment Outlook", ~ (1998)
  46. OECD, "Job Creation and Loss", ~ (1996)
  47. OECD, "Technology, Productivity and Job Creation", ~ (1998)
  48. Praag,C., "The Roots of Entrepreneurship and Labor Demand : Individual Ability and Low Risk Aversion", Economica, 45~62 (2001)
  49. Romer,P, "Increasing Return and Long-Run Growth", Journal of Political Economy, 94, pp.1002~1037 (1986)
  50. Sheshinski,E., "Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and the Grwoth Mechanism of the Free-Enterprise Economies" (2007), Princeton University Press
  51. Small Business Adminstration, "A National Assessment of Entrepreneurship and Regional Economic Growth and Development", mimeo, ~ (2005)
  52. The State of Small Business : A Report of the President, "Small Business Adminstration", ~ (2005)
  53. Stel,Andre, "The Impact of New Firm Formation on Regional Development in the Netherlands", Small Business Economics, 30, pp.31~47 (2008)
  54. The Contribution of Business Ownership in Bridge Down Unemployment in Japan, "Thurik,S.", Max Planck Institute of Economics, ~, pp.Working Paper 0506 (2006)
  55. Van Stel,D, "The Link Between Firm Births and Job Creation : Is There a Upass Tree Effect?", Regional Studies, 38(8), pp.893~909 (2004)
  56. Wenneker,A., "Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth", Small Business Economics, 13, pp.27~55 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)