본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인적자원의 혁신성, 학습지향성, 이들의 상호작용이 혁신효과 및 사업성과에 미치는 영향 : 중소기업과 대기업의 비교연구

The Impact of Human Resource Innovativeness, Learning Orientation, and Their Interaction on Innovation Effect and Business Performance : Comparison of Small and Medium-Sized vs. Large-Sized Companies

0

조회

0

다운로드

24

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 인적자원의 혁신성과 학습지향성이 혁신효과 및 사업성과에 미치는 영향관계를 연구함에 있어 중소기업과 대기업의 차이를 알아보는 것이었다. 다양한 업종의 실무자 479명으로부터 수집한 설문자료를 t-검정, 회귀분석 등을 이용하여 분석하였다. 연구결과에서 대기업은 중소기업에 비해 인적자원의 혁신성, 학습지향성, 혁신효과, 사업성과 면에서 더 높은 수준을 보였다. 혁신효과를 종속변인으로 한 회귀분석 결과에서 인적자원의 혁신성, 학습지향성, 인적자원의 혁신성-학습지향성의 상호작용 변인이 혁신효과에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 기업규모의 조절효과도 확인되어 중소기업의 경우 대기업에 비해 인적자원의 혁신성이 혁신효과에 미치는 영향이 더 크고, 대기업의 경우 중소기업에 비해 학습지향성이 혁신효과에 미치는 영향이 더 크다는 사실을 알 수 있었다. 사업성과를 종속변인으로 한 회귀분석 결과에서는 학습지향성, 혁신효과, 인적자원의 혁신성-학습지향성의 상호작용 변인이 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 기업규모의 조절효과가 확인되었다. 연구결과를 토대로 기업을 위한 시사점이 제시되었는데, 중소기업과 대기업 모두 혁신효과와 사업성과를 끌어올리기 위해 인적자원의 혁신성과 학습지향적 문화의 확산에 고루 투자함으로서 성공적인 혁신 상품과 서비스 개발을 이루고, 궁극적으로 사업성과의 향상에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore differences between small and medium-sized companies and large-sized companies in the impact of human resource innovativeness(HRI), learning orientation(LO), and HRI-LO interaction on innovation effect and business performance. Although learning orientation has long been considered as a key factor influencing good performance of a business, little research was devoted to exploring the effect of HRI-LO interaction on innovation effect and business performance. In this study, it is investigated whether there is a synergy effect between innovative human workforce and learning orientation corporate culture, in addition to each by itself, to generate good business performance as well as a success of new innovations in the market. Research hypotheses were as follows, including H1) human resource innovativeness(HRI), learning orientation(LO), and interactions of HRI and LO(HRI-LO interaction) positively affect innovation effect, H2) there is a difference of the effect of HRI, LO, and HRI-LO interaction on innovation effect between large-sized and small-sized companies, H3) HRI, LO, HRI-LO interaction, innovation effect positively affect business performance, and H4) there is a difference of the effect of HRI, LO, HRI-LO interaction, and innovation effect on business performance between large-sized and small-sized companies. Data were obtained from 479 practitioners through a web survey since the web survey is an efficient method to collect a national data at a variety of fields. A single respondent from a company was allowed to participate in the study after checking whether they have more than 5-year work experiences in the company. To check whether a common source bias is existed in the sample, additional data from a convenient sample of 97 companies were gathered through the traditional survey method, and were used to confirm correlations between research variables of the original sample and the additional sample. Data were divided into two groups according to company size, such as 352 small and medium-sized companies with less than 300 employees and 127 large-sized companies with 300 or more employees. Data were analyzed through t-test and regression analyses. HRI which is the innovativeness of human resources in the company was measured with 9 items assessing the innovativenss of practitioners in staff, manager, and executive-level positions. LO is the company's effort to encourage employees' development, sharing, and utilizing of knowledge through consistent learning. LO was measured by 18 items assessing commitment to learning, vision sharing, and open-mindedness. Innovation effect which assesses a success of new products/services in the market, was measured with 3 items. Business performance was measured by respondents' evaluations on profitability, sales increase, market share, and general business performance, compared to other companies in the same field. All items were measured by using 6-point Likert scales. Means of multiple items measuring a construct were used as variables based on acceptable reliability and validity. To reduce multi-collinearity problems generated on the regression analysis of interaction terms, centered data were used for HRI, LO, and Innovation effect on regression analyses. In group comparison, large-sized companies were superior on annual sales, annual net profit, the number of new products/services in the last 3 years, the number of new processes advanced in the last 3 years, and the number of R&D personnel, compared to small and medium-sized companies. Also, large-sized companies indicated a higher level of HRI, LO, HRI-LO interaction, innovation effect and business performance than did small and medium-sized companies. The results indicate that large-sized companies tend to have more innovative human resources and invest more on learning orientation than did small-sized companies, therefore, large-sized companies tend to have more success of a new product/service in the market, generating better business performance. In order to test research hypotheses, a series of multiple-regression analysis was conducted. In the regression analysis examining the impact on innovation effect, important results were generated as : 1) HRI, LO, and HRI-LO affected innovation effect, and 2) company size indicated a moderating effect. Based on the result, the impact of HRI on innovation effect would be greater in small and medium-sized companies than in large-sized companies whereas the impact of LO on innovation effect would be greater in large-sized companies than in small and medium-sized companies. In other words, innovative workforce would be more important in making new products/services that would be successful in the market for small and medium-sized companies than for large-sized companies. Otherwise, learning orientation culture would be more effective in making successful products/services for large-sized companies than for small and medium-sized companies. Based on these results, research hypotheses 1 and 2 were supported. In the analysis of a regression examining the impact on business performance, important results were generated as : 1) innovation effect, LO, and HRI-LO affected business performance, 2) HRI by itself did not have a direct effect on business performance regardless of company size, and 3) company size indicated a moderating effect. Specifically, an effect of the HRI-LO interaction on business performance was stronger in large-sized companies than in small and medium-sized companies. It means that the synergy effect of innovative human resources and learning orientation culture tends to be stronger as company is larger. Referring to these result, research hypothesis 3 was partially supported whereas hypothesis 4 was supported. Based on research results, implications for companies were generated. Regardless of company size, companies need to develop the learning orientation corporate culture as well as human resources' innovativeness together in order to achieve successful development of innovative products and services as well as to improve sales and profits. However, the effectiveness of the HRI-LO interaction would be varied by company size. Specifically, the synergy effect of HRI-LO was stronger to make a success of new products/services in small and medium-sized companies than in large-sized companies. However, the synergy effect of HRI-LO was more effective to increase business performance of large-sized companies than that of small and medium-sized companies. In the case of small and medium-sized companies, business performance was achieved more through the success of new products/services than much directly affected by HRI-LO. The most meaningful result of this study is that the effect of HRI-LO interaction on innovation effect and business performance was confirmed. It was often ignored in the previous research. Also, it was found that the innovativeness of human workforce would not directly influence in generating good business performance, however, innovative human resources would indirectly affect making good business performance by contributing to achieving the development of new products/services that would be successful in the market. These findings would provide valuable managerial implications specifically in regard to the development of corporate culture and education program of small and medium-sized as well as large-sized companies in a variety of fields.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 과학기술정책연구원, "2005년도 한국의 기술혁신조사 : 제조업 부문" (2005), 과학기술정책연구원
  2. "혁신피로증?", 동아일보(2007, 8. 3), B3~
  3. 윤영진, "기업성과에 대한 혁신성의 영향과 성과척도간의 관계에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1999
  4. 홍장표, "기술협력이 지역 중소기업의 혁신성과에 미치는 영향", 중소기업연구, 27(3), pp.3~30 (2005), 한국중소기업학회
  5. Aiken,L.S., "Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions" (1996), Sage Publications
  6. Baker,W.E., "The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, pp.411~427 (1999)
  7. Calantone,R.J., "Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance", Industrial Marketing Management, 31, pp.515~524 (2002)
  8. Carland,J.W., "Differentiating Entrepreneurs From Small Business Owners : A Conceptualization", Academy of Management Review, 9, pp.354~359 (1984)
  9. Carson,D.S., "Marketing and Entrepreneurship In SMEs : An Innovative Approach" (1995), Prentice Hall
  10. Cohen,W.M., "The Tradeoff Between Firm Size and Diversity In The Pursuit of Technological Progress", Small Business Economics, 4, pp.1~14 (1992)
  11. EMAC : Research Methodologies for the New Marketing Symposium, "Internet Survey : The Use of the Internet as a Data Collection Mmethod. ESOMAR", pp.2000, Comley,P
  12. Conceicao,P., "Innovative Acience and Technology Commercialization Strategies at 3M : A Case Study", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, pp.25~D. Hamil (2002)
  13. Dahl,D.W., "The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking During New Product Ideation", Journal of Marketing Research, 39, pp.47~61 (2002)
  14. Dalton,D.R., "Functional Turnover : An Empirical Assessment", Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, pp.716~721 (1981)
  15. Damanpour,F, "Organizational Innovation : A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinations and Moderators", Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp.555~590 (1991)
  16. Damanpour,F., "The Adoption of Innovation Over Time : Structural Characteristics and Performance of Organizations", Proceedings of National Decision Science Institute Conference (1990)
  17. Day,G, "The Capabilities of Market-driven Organizations", Journal of Marketing, 58 (1994)
  18. Deshpande,R., "Organizational Culture, Market Orientation, Innovativeness, and Firm Performance : An International Research Odyssey", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, pp.3~22 (1996)
  19. Dickson,P.R, "The Static and Dynamic Mechanics of Competition : A Comment on Hunt and Morgan's Comparative Advantage Theory", Journal of Marketing, 60, pp.102~106 (1996)
  20. Dillman,D.A., "Internet, Mail and Mixed Surveys" (2008), John Wiley and Sons
  21. Dos Santos,B.L., "Rewards To Inventors In Innovative Information Technology Applications: First Moves and Early Followers in ATMs", Organizational Science, 6, pp.241~259 (1995)
  22. Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation, "Dougherty,D", ~, pp.Marketing Science Institute Report, No.89-114 (1989)
  23. Frans,J.H.M, "Market Orientation, Innovativeness, Product Innovation, and Performance in Small Firms", Journal of Small Business Management, 422, pp.134~154 (2004)
  24. Hausman,A, "Innovativeness Among Small Businesses: Theory and Propositions for Future Research", Industrial Marketing Management, 34, pp.773~782 (2005)
  25. Hausman, A, "Generational Business Relationships : A Multi-site Case Study of Family Owner Businesses", Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 1, pp.41~58 (1999)
  26. Hult,G.T.M., "Innovativeness : Its Antecedents and Impact on Business Performance", Industrial Marketing Management, 33, pp.429~438 (2004)
  27. Hunt,S.D., "The Resource- Advantage Theory of Competition : Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions", Journal of Marketing, 60, pp.107~114 (1996)
  28. Hurly, R, "Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning : An Integration and Empirical Examination", Journal of Marketing, 62, pp.42~54 (1998)
  29. Jimenez-Jimenez,D., "The Performance Effect of Organizational Learning and Market Orientation", Industrial Marketing Management, 36, pp.694~708 (2006)
  30. Kanter,R.M, "The Change Masters : Innovation for Productivity in the American Corporation" (1988), Simon and Schuster
  31. Keskin,H, "Market Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Innovation Capabilities in SMEs", European Journal of Innovation Management, 9, pp.396~417 (2006)
  32. Kimberly,J.R., "rganizational Innovation : The Influence of Individual, Organizational and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations", Academy of Management Journal, 24, pp.689~713 (1981)
  33. Lin,B.W, "&D Intensity and Commercialization Orientation Effects on Financial Performance", Journal of Business Research, 59, pp.679~685 (2006)
  34. Podsakoff,P.M., "Effects of Organizational Formalization on Alienation among Professionals and Nonprofessionals", Academy of Management Journal, 29, pp.820~831 (1986)
  35. Podsakoff,P.M., "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research : A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp.879~903 (2003)
  36. Romano,C.A, "Identifying Factors Which Influence Product Innovation : A Case Study Approach", Journal of Management Studies, 27, pp.75~95 (1990)
  37. Santos-Vijande,M.L., "Organizational Learning and Market Orientation : Interface and Effects on Performance", Industrial Marketing Management, 34, pp.187~202 (2005)
  38. Senge,P.M, "The Fifth Discipline : The Art and Practice of the Learning", Journal of Marketing, 58, pp.35~45 (1990)
  39. Sinkula,J.M., "A Framework For Market-based Organizational Learning : Linking Values, Knowledge and Behavior", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, pp.305~318 (1997)
  40. Soni,P.K., "Industrial Innovation and Firm Performance : A Reconceptualization and Exploratory Structural Equation Analysis", International Journal of Research In Marketing, 10, pp.365~380 (1993)
  41. Stoneman,P, "Why Innovate?,” In A. Bowen and M. Ricketts, Stimulating Innovation in Industry" (1992), Kogan Page Limited
  42. Subramania,A, "Innovativeness : Redefining the Concept", Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 13, pp.223~243 (1996)
  43. Van de Ven,A.H, "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation", Management Science, 32, pp.590~607 (1986)
  44. Zahra,S.A., "Contextual Influences On The Corporate Entrepreneurship-Performance Relationship : A Longitudinal Analysis", Journal of Business Venturing, 10, pp.43~58 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)