본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

직무자율성과 급진적/점진적 창의성간의 관계:팀 몰입의 조절효과에 관한 다수준 연구

The Effects of Job Autonomy on Radical Creativity and Incremental Creativity: A Multilevel Study on the Moderating Effect of Team Commitment

김민수|권나영|윤현주|오인수
한국중소기업학회|2016.12|중소기업연구|제38권 제4호|pp. 1-25

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

다수준 분석Multilevel Analysis직무자율성Job Autonomy팀몰입Team Commitment급진적 창의성점진적 창의성Radical CreativityIncremental Creativity
주제분류경영학

초록

경영환경이 점차 불확실해지고 경쟁이 치열해 지면서, 조직 내 급진적 아이디어의 개발이 점차 강조되고 있다. 이에 단일한 창의성 개념에서 벗어나 급진적 창의성(radical creativity)과 점진적 창의성(incremental creativity)을 구분하여 연구할 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 개인의 직무자율성이 급진적 창의성, 점진적 창의성에 어떤 영향을 미치는지, 또한 팀수준에서의 팀몰입 정도가 그들의 관계를 어떻게 조절하는지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구를 위해 다양한 업종과 부서로부터 설문자료를 수집하였다. 먼저 확인적 요인분석 결과, 직무자율성, 급진적 창의성, 점진적 창의성이 서로 구별되는 개념임을 확인하였다. 개별 구성원들은 팀에 소속되어 있는 존재이므로, 위계적 선형모형(HLM: Hierarchical Linear Modeling)을 통해 개인수준과 팀수준 변수를 동시에 고려하는 다수준(multilevel) 분석을 실시하였다. 분석결과, 직무자율성은 급진적 창의성과 점진적 창의성 모두와 긍정적인 관계가 있었다. 팀수준의 팀몰입 정도는 직무자율성과 급진적 창의성간의 관계를 유의미하게 조절하는 효과가 있었다. 반면에 가설과는 달리, 팀몰입 정도가 직무자율성과 점진적 창의성간의 관계를 조절효과는 지지되지 않았다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 시사점, 한계와 향후 연구방향을 제시하였다. 본 연구를 통해, 팀 내에서 개인의 급진적 창의성이 잘 발휘되기 위해서는 직무자율성을 부여하는 노력을 더욱 장려할 필요가 있으며, 특히 팀 전체의 팀몰입 정도를 높일 필요가 있음을 알 수 있었다. 향후 급진적/점진적 창의성과 관련된 다양한 연구들이 진행되기를 기대한다.

Abstract

As business environment becomes more uncertain and competitive, the development of radical ideas in organization becomes more emphasized, and the necessity of studying on creativity by differentiating between radical creativity and incremental creativity beyond a broad and unitary construct has been proposed. The purpose of this paper was to examine the effects of job autonomy on radical creativity and incremental creativity at individual level, and the moderating effect of team commitment at team-level to those relationship. For this study, survey- based data were collected from various industries and teams in Korea. At first, performing confirmatory factor analyses, we checked for construct independence and discriminant validity of job autonomy, radical creativity, and incremental creativity. Then, we performed multilevel analyses using HLM (Hierarchical Linear Model) considering individual level and team level simultaneously because each individual was nested in a team. The results showed that job autonomy was positively related to radical creativity and incremental creativity. In addition, team commitment at team-level significantly moderated the relationship between job autonomy and radical creativity. On the contrary to hypotheses, the moderating effects of team commitment on the relationship between job autonomy and incremental creativity was not supported. Finally, we discussed the implications and limitations of this study, and future research direction. Through the study results, we were able to ensure that job autonomy is to be more provided to facilitate individual radical creativity in team, and specifically team commitment is to be more promoted at team-level. We expect that various studies on radical/incremental creativity will be progressed.

참고문헌 (75)

  1. 고득영, "직무자율성과 혁신행동 간의 관계: 직무만족의 매개효과와 성격과 조직혁신풍토의 조절효과", 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 25(1), pp.215~238 (2012), 한국산업및조직심리학회
  2. 김해룡, "직무자율성이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 셀프리더십의 매개효과를 중심으로", 조직과 인사관리연구, 35(4), pp.199~229 (2011), 한국인사관리학회
  3. 유동희, "업무 신속성과 직무 성과 및 조직시민행동 간 관계: 협력적 팀 풍토의 조절효과를 중심으로", 중소기업연구, 38(1), pp.1~23 (2016), 한국중소기업학회
  4. 유봉호, "자기효능감과 자율성이 창업성공 가능성에 미치는 영향: 내재적 동기와 위험감수성의 매개역할을 중심으로", 중소기업연구, 37(2), pp.87~105 (2015), 한국중소기업학회
  5. 송상호, "기술혁신의 특성과 기업환경, 내부능력, 전략간의 상황론적 연구", 인사관리연구, 19, pp.179~210 (1995)
  6. 이덕로, "직무특성이 개인창의성에 미치는 영향: 선행적 행동의 매개효과를 중심으로", 경영학연구, 37(3), pp.443~475 (2008), 한국경영학회
  7. 이준호, "연구개발팀의 다양성과 응집성이 팀 창의성에 미치는 영향: 창의적 역할모델로서 리더기능의 조절효과", 조직과 인사관리연구, 35(3), pp.171~197 (2011), 한국인사관리학회
  8. 조윤형, "직무특성과 정서노동이 직무몰입과 혁신성향에 미치는 영향: 사회적 지원의 조절효과", 조직과 인사관리연구, 35(3), pp.1~37 (2011), 한국인사관리학회
  9. 한봉주, "위계적 선형모형(HLM)을 이용한 조직의 조직문화가 구성원의 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향 분석: 분석수준별 접근방법의 비교를 중심으로", 조직과 인사관리연구, 36(3), pp.169~199 (2012), 한국인사관리학회[DOI]
  10. Amabile, T. M., "The Social Psychology of Creativity" (1983), Springer-Verlag
  11. Amabile, T. M., "Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 10", pp.123~167 (1988), JAI Press
  12. Amabile, T. M., "Creativity in context" (1996), Westview Press
  13. Bandura, A., "Negative self-efficacy and Goal Effects Revisite", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), pp.87~99 (2003)
  14. Becker, T. E., "Profiles of commitment: An empirical test", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), pp.177~190 (1993)
  15. Benner, M. J., "Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited", Academy of Management Review, 28(2), pp.238~256 (2003)
  16. Bishop, J. W., "Employee commitment and work team productivity", HR Magazine, 11, pp.107~111 (1997)
  17. Bishop, J. W., "An Examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment", Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), pp.439~450 (2000)
  18. Bishop, J. W., "Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment", Journal of Management, 26(6), pp.1113~1132 (2000)
  19. Bishop, J. W., "The differential effects of team commitment and organizational commitment on job performance and intention to quit", Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (1997)
  20. Bliese, P. D., "Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations", pp.349~381 (2000), Jossey-Bass
  21. Bryk, A. S., "Hierarchical linear models" (1992), Sage
  22. Carmeli, A., "Highquality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), pp.709~729 (2009)
  23. Chan, D., "Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different level of analysis: A typology of composition model", Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), pp.234~246 (1998)
  24. Christensen, C. M., "The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail" (1998), Harvard Business School Press
  25. Christensen, C. M., "The innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth" (2003), Harvard Business School Press
  26. Cronin, M. A., "Dynamics in Groups: Are We There Yet?", The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), pp.571~612 (2011)
  27. Deci, E. L., "Self-determination in a work organization", Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), pp.580~590 (1989)
  28. De Lara, P. Z. M., "Organizational anomie as moderator of the relationship between an unfavorable attitudinal environment and citizenship behavior(OCB)-empirical study among university administration and services personnel", Personnel Review, 36(6), pp.843~846 (2007)
  29. Dewar, R. D., "The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis", Management Science, 32(11), pp.1422~1433 (1986)
  30. Edmondson, A. C., "Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams", Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), pp.350~383 (1999)
  31. Eisenberger, R., "Learned industriousness", Psychological Review, 99(2), pp.248~267 (1992)
  32. Ettlie, J. E., "Organizational Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical vs Incremental Innovation", Management Science, 30(6), pp.682~695 (1984)
  33. Ford, B., "Managing engineers effectively", Business, 37, pp.49~52 (1987)
  34. Gagne, M., "Self-determination theory and work motivation", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), pp.331~362 (2005)
  35. Grant, A. M., "Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.28", pp.3~34 (2008)
  36. Gilson, L. L., "Radical and Incremental Creativity: Antecedents and Processes", Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), pp.21~28 (2011)
  37. Gupta, A. K., "The interplay between exploration and exploitation", Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), pp.693~706 (2006)
  38. Hackman, J. R., "Development of the job diagnostic survey", Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), pp.159~170 (1975)
  39. Hirst, G., "A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity", Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), pp.280~293 (2009)
  40. Hofmann, D. A., "An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models", Journal of Management, 23(6), pp.723~744 (1997)
  41. James, L. R., "Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias", Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), pp.85~98 (1984)
  42. Janis, I., "Groupthink" (1982), Houghton Mifflin
  43. King, N., "Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies", pp.81~100 (1990), Wiley
  44. Kostopoulos, K. C., "Team Exploratory and Exploitative Learning: Psychological Safety, Task Conflict, and Team Performance", Group and Organizational Management, 36(3), pp.385~415 (2011)
  45. Kreft, I., "Introducing Multilevel Modeling" (1998), Sage Publications
  46. Leonard, D., "When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups" (1999), Harvard Business School Press
  47. Levinthal, D., "The myopia of learning", Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), pp.95~112 (1993)
  48. Madjar, N., "Factors for Radical Creativity, Incremental Creativity, and Routine, Noncreative Performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), pp.730~743 (2011)
  49. March, J. G., "Exploitation and exploration in organizational learning", Organization Science, 2(1), pp.71~87 (1991)
  50. Markides, C., "Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), pp.19~25 (2006)
  51. Mumford, M. D., "Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation", Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), pp.27~43 (1988)
  52. Nord, W. R., "Implementing routine and radical innovations" (1987), Lexington Books
  53. Oldham, G. R., "Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work", Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), pp.607~634 (1996)
  54. Organ, D. W., "A metaanalytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior", Personnel Psychology, 48(4), pp.775~802 (1995)
  55. Parker, S. K., "From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy", Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), pp.447~469 (2000)
  56. Podsakoff, P. M., "Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research", Journal of Management, 26(3), pp.513~563 (2000)
  57. Porter, L. W., "Organizational commitment, job Satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians", Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), pp.603~609 (1974)
  58. Rhoades, L., "Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), pp.825~836 (2001)
  59. Shalley, C. E., "What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity", The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), pp.33~53 (2004)
  60. Shalley, C. E., "The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?", Journal of Management, 30(6), pp.933~958 (2004)
  61. Smith, K. G., "Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication", Administration Science Quarterly, 39(3), pp.412~438 (1994)
  62. Snijders, T., "Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling" (1999), Sage Publications
  63. Sternberg, R. J., "A propulsion model of types of creative contributions", Review of General Psychology, 3(2), pp.83~100 (1999)
  64. Tushman, M. L., "Winning through innovation" (1997), Harvard Business School Press
  65. Unsworth, K., "Unpacking creativity", Academy of Management Review, 26(2), pp.289~297 (2001)
  66. Vandenberghe, C., "Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), pp.47~71 (2004)
  67. Van der Vegt, G. S., "Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification", Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), pp.532~547 (2005)
  68. Wang, A., "When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), pp.106~121 (2010)
  69. West, M. A., "Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care", Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), pp.393~410 (2003)
  70. West, M. A., "Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies" (1990), Wiley
  71. Woodman, R. W., "Toward a theory of organizational creativity", Academy of Management Review, 18(2), pp.293~321 (1993)
  72. Wrzesniewski, A., "Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work", Academy of Management Review, 26(2), pp.179~201 (2001)
  73. Wrzesniewski, A., "Job Crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work", Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology, 1, pp.281~302 (2013)
  74. Zhou, J., "Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects of creative performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), pp.261~276 (1998)
  75. Ziebro, M., "Connecting the dots: Network development, information flow, and creativity in groups", Creativity in Groups Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 12, pp.135~162 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

직무자율성이 직무열의 및 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 : 개인수준의 팀 성과압박에 조절효과를 중심으로김수, 장은미산업개발연구소 · 산업혁신연구2021 · 제37권 제1호창의적 과정몰입이 급진적 창의성과 점진적 창의성에 미치는 영향: 직무몰입과 위험감수풍토의 상호작용을 중심으로정석, 홍아정한국기업교육학회 · 기업교육과인재연구2020 · 제22권 제2호공공조직의 직무자율성이 혁신행동에 미치는 영향: 창의적 자기효능감의 매개효과 및 조직몰입의 조절효과를 중심으로김선혁, 이연실한국인사행정학회 · 한국인사행정학회보2024 · 제23권 제1호직무자율성과 혁신행동 간의 관계: 직무만족의 매개효과와 성격과 조직혁신풍토의 조절효과고득영, 유태용한국산업및조직심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직2012 · 제25권 제1호직무 자율성이 직무만족에 미치는 영향: 직무개선과 일 열의의 개인내-개인간 다수준 매개효과를 중심으로권나영, 김민수, 오인수한국산업및조직심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직2016 · 제29권 제4호스마트워크에서 직무자율성이 창의적 행위에 미치는 영향김용영대한산업경영학회 · 산업융합연구2023 · 제21권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

한국 기혼여성창업가의 경영방식에 대한 사례연구: 가정과 일 병행전략을 중심으로오지선, 김영환pp. 27-52바이오벤처기업의 내부 역량과 외적 요인이 경영 성과에 미치는 영향이승용, 정승화, 문승욱pp. 53-76창업기업 생존율 영향 요인 고찰:청년창업을 중심으로주영혁, 조봉현, 곽동철pp. 77-94기업가 지향성: 국내 선행연구 분석 및 향후 연구방향에 대한 제언이재강, 박태경pp. 95-120
원문 보기