본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Section of Korean SMEs Regulatory Status and Reorganizing Program

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

The Korean government has put lots of efforts on reforming regulations, but it does not still have much less influence on the industry field in small and medium enterprises(SMEs). The results of analysis show that the regulations reduce the investments and affect the management of corporations. For instance, the management regulations affect moderately such industries as working environments, human resources, and labors. But they have the most severe effect on the investment in plant and equipment. The result indicates that if regulations are not improved, a number of SMEs consider cutting down, shutdown, overseas transfers, or sale of their business. Therefore, it comes out that what most of the SMEs request is to reduce such regulations as complicated administrative procedures (red tapes). While appropriate regulations lead to desirable economic development of our society, excessive regulations disturb the corporations’ profit pursuit, deteriorate the entrepreneurship, and disturb creativity. SMEs’ weak countermeasure ability toward regulations and excessive regulations make serious damages to them. As a result, these adverse factors result in cost increase, investment shrinking, and reluctance to launch new businesses of SMEs. To strengthen the competitiveness of SMEs, epochal regulatory reform is most needed through the idea of conversion. Current positive regulatory approaching method, ‘Prohibited in principle, allowed in exceptional cases,’ should be transferred to negative method, ‘Accepted in principle, prohibited exceptions.’ We should make a good environment for corporation-friendly management by reducing unnecessary regulations, and encouraging the creativity and challenge of SMEs. Continuous and institutional regulatory reduction must be provided instead of partial and temporary regulatory reform by government. The SMEs’ efforts are important in itself. It is the right times that voluntary efforts to overcome regulations are most needed to avoid the passive actions past traditional purpose of the business.

Abstract

The Korean government has put lots of efforts on reforming regulations, but it does not still have much less influence on the industry field in small and medium enterprises(SMEs). The results of analysis show that the regulations reduce the investments and affect the management of corporations. For instance, the management regulations affect moderately such industries as working environments, human resources, and labors. But they have the most severe effect on the investment in plant and equipment. The result indicates that if regulations are not improved, a number of SMEs consider cutting down, shutdown, overseas transfers, or sale of their business. Therefore, it comes out that what most of the SMEs request is to reduce such regulations as complicated administrative procedures (red tapes). While appropriate regulations lead to desirable economic development of our society, excessive regulations disturb the corporations’ profit pursuit, deteriorate the entrepreneurship, and disturb creativity. SMEs’ weak countermeasure ability toward regulations and excessive regulations make serious damages to them. As a result, these adverse factors result in cost increase, investment shrinking, and reluctance to launch new businesses of SMEs. To strengthen the competitiveness of SMEs, epochal regulatory reform is most needed through the idea of conversion. Current positive regulatory approaching method, ‘Prohibited in principle, allowed in exceptional cases,’ should be transferred to negative method, ‘Accepted in principle, prohibited exceptions.’ We should make a good environment for corporation-friendly management by reducing unnecessary regulations, and encouraging the creativity and challenge of SMEs. Continuous and institutional regulatory reduction must be provided instead of partial and temporary regulatory reform by government. The SMEs’ efforts are important in itself. It is the right times that voluntary efforts to overcome regulations are most needed to avoid the passive actions past traditional purpose of the business.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Kyungki Development Institute, "Analysis of the economic effects of the regulations of metropolitan area", ~ (2007)
  2. Prime Minister Center, "Comprehensive plan in 2009 the Regulatory Reform", ~ (2009)
  3. Regulatory Reform Committee, "2008 regulatory reform guidelines", ~ (2007)
  4. Regulatory Reform Committee, "Regulatory Reform White Paper", ~ (2007)
  5. Kim sin, "Administrative regulations to enhance the quality" (2005), Korea administrative institute
  6. Kim sin, "To ease regulatory burden of SMEs" (2005), Korea administrative institute
  7. Kim jong seok, "Regulatory reform and regulatory reform to improve the system, the direction of development, Regulatory Research", ~ (1999)
  8. Kim Hui suk, "Innovative Corporation Regulatory Reform for environment" (2001), Industrial Research Institute
  9. Chamber of Commerce, "Recent changes of Japan that regulations of Japan and policy", ~ (2007)
  10. Chamber of Commerce, "Deregulation of the U.S. system of SMEs", ~ (2007)
  11. Park Nam-kyu, "The growth of SMEs, entrepreneurship and the internationalization strategy of the corporation to consider the impact", SMEs research, 30(4) (2008), Korea SMEs Committee
  12. Bae jong-tae, "Entrepreneurship expansion and enabled", SMEs research, 31(1) (2009), Korea SMEs Committee
  13. Industrial Research Institute, "Innovative corporation Environment for Regulatory Reform", ~ (2001)
  14. Industrial Research Institute, "Regulation of growth of knowledge-based reform", ~ (2002)
  15. Yang Hyun-bong, "Established to promote business and improve the system", SMEs Research, 28(4) (2006), Korea SMEs Committee
  16. Lee Jong-wook, "Financing difficulties of SMEs and measures of Korea", SMEs research, 29(4) (2007), Korea SMEs Committee
  17. Lee Joo-sun, "Regulatory reform measures to improve system" (2007), Korea Economic Research Institute
  18. Lee Joo-heon, "Research on motivation and decision- making foundation established", SMEs research, 30(1) (2008), Korea SMEs Committee
  19. Lim Sang-joon, "The direction of reform and development of regulatory policies", Korea Economic Research, ~ (2005)
  20. Cho Min-kyung, "Korea government policy for SMEs competitiveness analysis", SMEs research, 30 (2008), Korea SMEs Committee
  21. Jeong dae-yong, "Entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation and its impact on the organization and business validation", Venture management research, 10 (2007), Korea SMEs Committee
  22. Cho byung-sun, "Status and problems of the SMEs Legislation", SMEs research, 30(4) (2008), Korea SMEs Committee
  23. Cho I-hyun, "corporation to improve competitiveness, the innovation of new models" (2008), SMEs research Institute
  24. SME administration, "SMEs Regulatory impact analysis on the operating conditions, and case studies developed research", ~ (2008)
  25. SMEs Task Force Committee SME administration, "Research on the regulation of innovative SMEs in industrial zone", ~ (2005)
  26. Cha Moon-jung, "corporation Regulatory reform to improve the environment for research" (2005), KDI
  27. Korea regulatory Committee, "Achievements and challenges of regulatory reform debate Resources", ~ (2008)
  28. Huh Jae-wan, "Investment plan for the metropolitan area deregulation" (2008), Chamber of Commerce
  29. Better Regulation Task Force(BRTF), "Employment Regulation-Striking a Balance", ~ (2002)
  30. Better Regulation Task Force(BRTF), "Principles of Good Regulation", ~ (2003)
  31. Chadwick,M., "The Impact of Regulation:Results from Two On-line Surveys" (2004), ISBA
  32. Chittenden,F., "Tax Regulation and Small Business in the USA, UK, Australia and New Zealand", International Small Business Journal, 21(1), pp.93~115 (2003)
  33. Darrell Porter, "Simplifying business regulations", First Workshop of the PEC-OECD Co-operative Initiative on Regulatory Reform (2001)
  34. General Accounting Office, "Regulatory Reform: Implemetation of the Small Business Advocacy Review Panel Requirements" (1998), GAO
  35. Hebert,R.F., "The Entrepreneur, mainstream Views and Radical Critiques.(2nd Ed.)" (1988), Praeger
  36. OECD, "Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries, Public management Committee" (2002), OECD
  37. OECD, "Product Market Regulation and Productivity Growth, Working Party No.1", Economic Policy Committee, Economics Department (ECO, WP1 (2005)16), OECD, pp.2005, ~
  38. Quartey,Peter, "Regulation, Competition, Competition, and Small and medium Enterprises in Developing Countries" (2001), University of Manchester
  39. Shleifer, A, "Politicians and Firms", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109 (1994)
  40. Small Business Research Center, "Regulation and Small Firm Performance and Growth" (2005), Kingston University
  41. Djankov S. R, "The Regulation of Entry", Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper, (1904) (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)