竞技致损行为的正当化根据及刑罚边界
The Justification Grounds and Penalty Borderline of Sports Injury Behavior
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
发端于社会相当性理论的允许危险理论是某些竞技致损行为的正当化根据。规则内竞技致损行为属正当行为，不应入罪。违反竞技规则并过失致人损害的行为属于允许风险范围内行为，不宜入罪。违反竞技规则并故意致人损害的情形超出了允许风险范围，可以入罪。非出于竞技目的而实施的致损行为应当入罪。
Abstract
The allowed danger theory, which originated from the theory of social worthiness, are the justification grounds of some sports injury behaviors. Sports injuries caused within sports rules fall into legitimate behavior and should not be convicted. The behaviors of violating sports rules and committing injuries by mistakes belong to allowed danger, and it is not proper for such behaviors to be convicted. Violating sports rules and committing injuries on purpose exceed allowed danger and such behaviors can be convicted. Injuries caused by non‐sports purpose behaviors should be convicted.
참고문헌 (11)
- 杜里奥, "意大利刑法原理〔Ｍ〕" (1998), 法律出版社
- 卡斯东, "法国刑法总论精义〔Ｍ〕" (1998), 中国政法大学出版社
- 大谷实, "刑法总论〔Ｍ〕" (2003), 法律出版社
- 马克昌, "犯罪通论" (1999), 武汉大学出版社
- 大谷实, "刑法总论〔Ｍ〕" (2003), 法律出版社
- 克劳斯, "德国刑法学总论" (2005), 法律出版社
- 黄京平, "竞技行为正当化研究〔Ｊ〕", 中国刑事法杂志, (6) (2004)
- 林亚刚, "竞技体育中伤害行为的刑法评价〔Ｊ〕", 政治与法律, (2) (2005)
- 卡斯东, "法国刑法总论精义〔Ｍ〕" (1998), 中国政法大学出版社
- 王泽鉴, "侵权行为法〔Ｍ〕" (2001), 中国政法大学出版社
- 吴凰行, "一场篮球赛所引起的人身损害赔偿法律思考", ~