본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

예비 중등 수학교사의 비례추론 이해

Prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ understanding of proportional reasoning

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

중등 예비수학교사가비례추론을 어떻게이해하는지 파악하고비례추론과제를 해결하는데있어서어떤전략을어떻게 활용하는지를 살펴보았다. 선행연구에서 개발된 질문지를 수정, 검토하여 서울 소재 교원양성기관에 재학 중인4명의 예비교사를 인터뷰하였으며, 녹취록을 바탕으로 비례추론에서 예비교사가 보이는 사고의 특징들에 대해 분석하였다. 분석 결과로, 첫째, 예비교사들은 비와 비율의 용어를 혼동하고 혼용하였는데 특히 비율을 단순히 분수로 인식함으로써 기준량을 항상 전체로인식하는 경향을 보였다. 둘째, 비례상황의 의미를 파악하는것이 비례추론의 핵심임에도 불구하고 비례상황을 의미를 기초로 한 추론을 발전시키지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 두 양을 관련지음으로써 얻어지는 속성의 의미를 잘 파악하지 못하며, 비례식 등호의 의미도 명확하게 설명하지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 수치를 다루지않는 질적추론문제에서이러한경향이명확하게나타나는데, 이는예비교사가 비례상황을 인식할 때피상적인단어들을이용하기때문으로밝혀졌다.

Abstract

This study examined the understanding of proportional reasoning of prospective secondary mathematics teachers and the strategies they employ in solving tasks pertaining to this topic. The questionnaire developed in the previous study was revised and reviewed, and four preservice teachers enrolled in a teacher education institution in Seoul were interviewed. The transcripts of these interviews were analyzed to identify the characteristics of preservice teachers’ thinking in proportional reasoning. The results of the analysis indicated that, initially, the preservice teachers exibited confusion regarding the distinction between the terms “ratio” and “proportion.” Notably, they demonstrated a tendency to perceive the referece quantity as a whole at all times, interpreting the ratio as a function. Secondly, it appeared that they did not develop reasoning based on the meaning of the proportional situation, despited the fact that grasping the meaning of the proportional situation is the fundamental aspect of proportional reasoning. This was particularly evident in qualitative reasoning tasks that did not involve numbers, as the preservice teacher used superfical terms to recognize proportional situations, even though grasping the meaning of proportional situations is central to proportional reasoning.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 권오남, "중학교 교육과정에서 비례적 사고가 필요한 수학 개념 분석", 수학교육, 46(3), pp.315~329 (2007)
  2. 김경선, "초등학생의 비례적 추론 지도에 관한 연구", 학교수학, 9(4), pp.447~466 (2007)
  3. 김구연, "수업지도안 분석을 통한 수학교사의 수업설계역량(Pedagogical Design Capacity) 탐색", 수학교육, 56(4), pp.365~385 (2017)[DOI]
  4. 서지혜, "한국과 미국 교과서의 비와 비례 영역 수학 과제가 제시하는 비례추론에 대한 학습기회 탐색", 석사, pp.2018
  5. 송동현, "초등학교 수학 교과서에 제시된 비례추론 과제의 분석", 초등수학교육, 25(1), pp.57~79 (2022)[DOI]
  6. 장혜원, "비례식과 비례배분에 대한 초등 수학 교과서 비교 분석", 학교수학, 19(2), pp.229~248 (2017)
  7. 정영옥, "초등학교에서 비례추론 지도에 관한 논의", 수학교육학연구, 25(1), pp.21~58 (2015)
  8. 정은실, "초등학교 수학 교과에서의 비례추론에 관한 연구", 수학교육학연구, 23(4), pp.505~516 (2013)
  9. 조수현, "수학 교사의 교과서 이해 및 활용 의도 탐색", 수학교육, 60(1), pp.111~131 (2021)[DOI]
  10. 최은아, "초등예비교사의 비례추론 과제에 대한 전략 분석", 한국초등수학교육학회지, 20(4), pp.601~625 (2016)
  11. Ball, D. L., "Content knowledge for teaching : What makes it special", Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), pp.389~407 (2008)[DOI]
  12. Ben-Chaim, D., "Designing and implementing authentic investigative proportional reasoning tasks : the impact on pre-service mathematics teachers' content and pedagogical knowledge and attitudes", Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, pp.333~340 (2007)[DOI]
  13. Berk, D., "Developing prospective elementary teachers'flexibility in the domain of proportional reasoning", Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(3), pp.113~135 (2009)[DOI]
  14. Campbell, P. F., "The relationship between teachers’ mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge, teachers’ perceptions, and student achievement", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), pp.419~459 (2014)
  15. Cramer, K., "Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics", pp.159~178 (1993), Macmillan
  16. Ellis, A., "Connections between generalizing and justifying : Students’ reasoning with linear relationships", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), pp.194~229 (2007)[DOI]
  17. Freudenthal, H., "Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures" (1983), Reidel Publishing Company
  18. Gilbert, M. J., "Proportional reasoning: (Mis)Conceptions Of elementary preservice teachers", Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp.1053~1056 (2007), University of Nevada
  19. Hill, H. C., "Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction : Lessons learned and open issues", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(4), pp.559~576 (2012)
  20. Hull, L.S.H., "Teachers' mathematical understanding of proportionality: Links to curriculum, professional development, and support", doctor, pp.2000
  21. Lamon, S. J., "Rational numbers an integration of research", pp.131~156 (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum
  22. Lamon, S. J., "Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding" (2005), Lawrence Erbaum
  23. Lamon, S., "Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning", pp.629~667 (2007), Information Age
  24. Langrall, C. W., "Three balloons for two dollars : Developing proportional reasoning", Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(4), pp.254~261 (2000)[DOI]
  25. Lanius, C. A., "Proportionality : A unifying theme for the middle grades", Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8(8), pp.392~396 (2003)[DOI]
  26. Lesh, R., "Number concepts and operations in the middle grades", pp.93~118 (1988), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  27. Developing essential understanding of ratios, proportions, and proportional reasoning for teaching mathematics in grade 6-8, "Lobato, J.", National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, ~ (2010)
  28. Lobato, J., "Middle school teachers' knowledge of proportional reasoning for teaching", Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2011)
  29. Nabors, W. K., "From fractions to proportional reasoning : a cognitive schemes of operation approach", Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(2), pp.133~179 (2003)[DOI]
  30. Nagar, G., "Teachers’ understanding of ratios and their connections to fractions", Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Edaucation, pp.764~771 (2015), Michigan State University
  31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics" (1989), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Principles and standards for school mathematics" (2000), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense making" (2009), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  34. National Research Council, "Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education" (2001), National Academy Press
  35. Petit, M. M., "A focus on ratios and proportions : Bringing mathematics education research to the classroom" (2020), Routledge
  36. Post, T., "The Idea of Algebra K-12 (1988 Yearbook)", pp.78~90 (1988), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  37. Shield, M., "Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), pp.183~199 (2013)[DOI]
  38. Thomson, P., "The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics", pp.179~234 (1994), Sunny Press
  39. Van de Walle, J. A., "수학을 어떻게 가르칠 것인가" (2008), 경문사
  40. Van Dooren, W., "Not everything is proportional : Effects of age and problem type on propensities for over generalization", Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), pp.57~86 (2005)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)