본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소비자의 조절모드와 희소성 메시지가 패션제품평가에 미치는 영향

The effect of consumers' self-regulatory modes and scarcity messages on fashion product evaluations

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류생활과학

초록

This study looked into the scarcity effect based on the consumers' self-regulatory modes and determined the effect that such a regulatory mode and that quantity-scarcity messages would have on evaluations of fashion products. To that end, the study used a 2 (regulatory mode: assessment mode/locomotion mode)×2 (message type: quantity-scarcity message/non-scarcity message) between-subjects factorial design in which buying impulsiveness was presented as a mediator variable that showed differences in product evaluations depending on the message type and on the presence of a self-regulatory mode. The results of this study showed that locomotion-oriented consumers evaluated products more positively compared to assessment-oriented consumers when the quantity-scarcity message was presented. When a non-scarcity message was presented, no significant difference was observed in product evaluations based on the consumers' self-regulatory modes. In addition, buying impulsiveness in consumers served a mediator role in the evaluations of fashion products. The results of this study imply that a clear understanding of consumers is a prerequisite for maximizing the scarcity effect and that companies need to differentiate in terms of the way they use scarcity messages based on consumers' self-regulatory modes.

Abstract

This study looked into the scarcity effect based on the consumers' self-regulatory modes and determined the effect that such a regulatory mode and that quantity-scarcity messages would have on evaluations of fashion products. To that end, the study used a 2 (regulatory mode: assessment mode/locomotion mode)×2 (message type: quantity-scarcity message/non-scarcity message) between-subjects factorial design in which buying impulsiveness was presented as a mediator variable that showed differences in product evaluations depending on the message type and on the presence of a self-regulatory mode. The results of this study showed that locomotion-oriented consumers evaluated products more positively compared to assessment-oriented consumers when the quantity-scarcity message was presented. When a non-scarcity message was presented, no significant difference was observed in product evaluations based on the consumers' self-regulatory modes. In addition, buying impulsiveness in consumers served a mediator role in the evaluations of fashion products. The results of this study imply that a clear understanding of consumers is a prerequisite for maximizing the scarcity effect and that companies need to differentiate in terms of the way they use scarcity messages based on consumers' self-regulatory modes.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Avnet, T., "Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit : Value transfer from"how"to"what"", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, pp.525~530 (2003)
  2. Bae, Y. K., "The effect of scarcity message on consumer's purchase intention in the internet shopping mall", The Korean Journal of Advertising, 15(5), pp.503~521 (2004)
  3. Baek, M. Y., "A study on the licensing effect in purchase situation of fashion product: The moderating effect of self-regulatory mode and goal type", master, pp.2012
  4. 백소라, "소비자의 조절방식이 시간한정 프로모션에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지: 소비자·광고, 14(3), pp.471~487 (2013), 한국소비자·광고심리학회
  5. Barone, M. J., "Mood and brand extension judgment : Asymmetric effects for desirable versus undesirable brands", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), pp.283~290 (2002)
  6. Bozzolo, A. M., "Unavailability effects on message processing : A theoretical analysis and an empirical test", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), pp.93~101 (1992)
  7. Brannon, L. A., "Scarcity claims elicit extreme responding to persuasive message : Role of cognitive elaboration", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(3), pp.365~375 (2001)
  8. Brock, T. C., "Liberalization of commodity theory", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), pp.135~144 (1992)
  9. Brock, T. C., "Implications of commodity theory for value change" (1968), Academic Press
  10. 최은영, "희소성 메시지의 광고 효과 - 한정판과 시간압박을 중심으로", 광고연구, 89(89), pp.177~204 (2011), 한국광고홍보학회
  11. Cialdini, R. B., "Influence: science and practice" (2001), Pearson Education Company
  12. Ditto, P. H., "From rarity to evaluative extremity: Effects of prevalence information on evaluations of positive and negative characteristics", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, pp.16~26 (1989)
  13. Fisher, R. J., "In the mood to buy : Differences in the mood states experienced by compulsive buyers and other consumers", Psychology & Marketing, 13(8), pp.803~819 (1996)
  14. Folger, R., "On wanting what we do not have", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, pp.123~133 (1992)
  15. Friestad, M., "The persuasion knowledge model : How people cope with persuation attempts", Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), pp.1~31 (1994)
  16. Fromkin, H. L., "Affective and valuational consequences of self-perceived uniqueness deprivation", doctor, pp.1968
  17. Fromkin, H. L., "A commodity theory analysis of consumer preferences for scarce products", Proceeding of 79th Annual Convention of the America Psychological Association, 6, pp.521~654 (1971)
  18. Gierl, H., "Scarcity effects on sales volume in retail. The International Review of Retail", Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(1), pp.45~61 (2008)
  19. Hansen, R. A., "An empirical investigation of attribute importance in retail store selection", Journal of Retailing, 53(4), pp.59~72 (1997)
  20. 황선진, "인터넷 공동구매시 충동구매성향과 가격, 희소성 메시지가 의류제품에 대한 호의도와 구매의도에 미치는 영향", 한국의류학회지, 33(10), pp.1519~1529 (2009), 한국의류학회
  21. 전성률, "희소성 메시지의 유형이 소비자의 구매의도에 미치는 효과에 관한 연구", 마케팅연구, 19(2), pp.71~90 (2004), 한국마케팅학회
  22. Jung, J. M., "Cross-national differences in proneness to scarcity effect: The moderating roles of familiarity, uncertainty avoidance, and need for cognitive closure", Psychology and Marketing, 21(9), pp.739~759 (2004)
  23. 김인혜, "소비가치와 경험적 제품평가가 희소성 메시지 효과에 미치는 영향", 복식문화연구, 19(6), pp.1133~1149 (2011), 복식문화학회
  24. Kruglanski, A. W., "To "do the right thing" or to "just do it":Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, pp.793~815 (2000)
  25. 이준환, "희소성 메시지와 조절초점을 활용한 레스토랑 판촉전략에 관한 연구", 호텔경영학연구, 19(6), pp.77~97 (2010), 한국호텔외식관광경영학회
  26. 이명천, "소비자 지식체계와 희소성 메시지가 브랜드 제휴 광고 효과에 미치는 영향", 광고연구, 94(94), pp.39~69 (2012), 한국광고홍보학회
  27. Lyi, D. R., "Operationalization and normative effect of buying impulsiveness: A comparison between Korea and the United States", Korea Advertising Society, 8(1), pp.31~84 (1997)
  28. Lynn, M., "Scarcity's enhancement of desirability : The role of naive economic theories", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), pp.67~78 (1992)
  29. Mannetti, L., "Priming the ant or the grasshopper in people's mind : How regulatory mode affects inter-temporal choices", European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, pp.1120~1125 (2009)
  30. Orehek, E., "Prioritizing association strength versus value : The influence of self-regulatory modes on means evaluation in single goal and multigoal contexts", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), pp.22~31 (2012)
  31. Park, E. J., "The effects of situation factors and consumption values on the impulse buying behaviors in apparel store", Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 24(6), pp.873~883 (2000)
  32. Pierro, A., "On the psychology of time in action : Regulatory mode orientations and procrastination", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), pp.1317~1331 (2011)
  33. Pierro, A., "Regulatory mode effects on counterfactual thinking and regret", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, pp.321~329 (2008)
  34. Rook, D. W., "Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior", Journal of Consumer Research, 22, pp.305~313 (1995)
  35. Snyder, C. R., "Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction : A consumer catch-22 carousel?", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, pp.9~24 (1992)
  36. 손해경, "구매상황변수, 구매충동, 충동구매, 충성도 간의 구조적 관계분석", 관광연구, 27(1), pp.153~173 (2012), 대한관광경영학회[DOI]
  37. Stern, H., "The significance of impulse buying today", Journal of Marketing, 26(4), pp.59~62 (1962)
  38. Sung, H. S., "Impulse buying behavioral model: The role of self-regulation mode, subjective wellbeing, social influence, and self-esteem", Proceeding of Autumn Annual Conference of Korea Distribution Association, 2010(11), pp.193~205 (2010)
  39. 성형석, "고객의 자기조절성향이 서비스 실패에 따른부정적 감정과 고객반응에 미치는 영향 -귀인과정에 따른 조정적 역할을 중심으로-", 아시아마케팅저널, 12(2), pp.83~110 (2010), 한국마케팅학회
  40. Verhallen, T. M. M., "Scarcity and preference : An experiment on unavailability and product evaluation", Journal of Economic Psychology, 15, pp.315~331 (1994)
  41. Verplanken, B., "Individual differences in impulse buying tendency : feeling and no thinking", European Journal of Personality, 15, pp.71~83 (2001)
  42. Wright, R. A., "Desire for outcomes that are more and less difficult to attain : Analysis in terms of energization theory", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, pp.25~45 (1992)
  43. Yeo, J. S., "Scarcity effects in marketing", doctor, pp.2005
  44. 여준상, "혁신적 신제품에 대한 소비자반응에 있어 심적 시뮬레이션 영향 연구", 마케팅연구, 25(1), pp.25~47 (2010), 한국마케팅학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)