Empirical Comparisons of Analytic Strategies for MIMIC DIF Analysis: A Potential Solution for Biased Anchor Set

키워드

참고문헌 (54)

1. American Educational Research Association, "Standards for educational and psychological testing" (1999), American Educational Research Association
2. Barrett,P, "Structural equation modeling: Adjusting model fit", Personality and Individual Differences, 42, pp.815~824 (2007)
3. Bollen,K.A, "Structural equations with latent variables" (1989), Wiley
4. Brannick,M.T, "Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, pp.201~213 (1995)
5. Byrne, B. M, "The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process", Structural Equation Modeling, 13, pp.287~321 (2006)
6. Camilli, G, "Measurement methods for the social sciences series: Methods for identifying biased test items (Vol. 4)" (1994), Sage
7. Chen,F.F, "Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance", Structural Equation Modeling, 14, pp.464~504 (2007)
8. Cheung, G. W, "Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method", Journal of Management, 25, pp.1~27 (1999)
9. Cheung, G. W., "Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance", Structural Equation Modeling, 9, pp.233~255 (2002)
10. Christensen, H, "The “common cause hypothesis” of cognitive aging: Evidence for not only a common factor but also specific associations of age with vision and grip strength in a cross-sectional analysis", Psychology and Aging, 16, pp.588~599 (2001)
11. Dorans, N. J, "DIF detection and description: Mantel Haenszel and standardization, in Differential Item Functioning", pp.35~66 (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum
12. Drasgow,F, "Scrutinizing psychological tests: Measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are central issues", Psychological Bulletin, 95, pp.134~135 (1984)
13. Everson, H. T, "Beyond individual differences: Exploring school effects on SAT scores", Educational Psychologist, 39, pp.157~172 (2004)
14. Finch,H, "The MIMIC model as a method for detecting DIF: Comparison with Mantel-Haenszel, SIBTEST and the IRT likelihood ratio test", Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, pp.278~295 (2005)
15. Finch, H, "Estimation of MIMIC model parameters with multilevel data", Structural Equation Modeling, 18, pp.229~252 (2011)
16. "Using MIMIC models to assess the influence of differential item functioning"[URL]
17. Fleishman, J. A, "Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability", Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57, pp.275~283 (2002)
18. Gallo, J. J, "Age differences in the symptoms of depression: A latent trait analysis", Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, pp.251~264 (1994)
19. González-Romá, V, "Power and Type I error of the mean and covariance structure analysis model for detecting differential item functioning in graded response items", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, pp.29~53 (2006)
20. Jones,R.N, "Identification of measurement differences between English and Spanish language versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination: Detecting differential item functioning using MIMIC modeling", Medical Care, 44, pp.124~133 (2006)
21. Jöreskog, K. G, "Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10, pp.631~639 (1975)
22. Kamata, A., "A note on the relation between factor analytic and item response theory models", Structural Equation Modeling, 15, pp.136~153 (2008)
23. Lee,J, "Type I error and power of the MACS CFA for DIF detection: Methodological issues and resolutions", 박사, pp.2009
24. Lee, J, "Methodological issues in using structural equation models for testing differential item functioning, in Cross-cultural data analysis: Methods and applications", pp.57~86 (2010), Routledge
25. Little,T.D, "Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, pp.53~76 (1997)
26. Little, T. D., "A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models", Structural Equation Modeling, 13, pp.59~72 (2006)
27. MacIntosh, R., "Variance estimation for converting MIMIC model parameters to IRT parameters in DIF analysis", Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, pp.372~379 (2003)
28. Mackinnon, A., "A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample", Personality and Individual Differences, 27, pp.405~416 (1999)
29. Maydeu-Olivares, A, "A cautionary note on using G2 (dif) to assess relative model fit in categorical data analysis", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, pp.55~64 (2006)
30. McDonald,R.P, "Test theory: Unified treatment" (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
31. Meade, A. W, "A Monte-Carlo study of confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement equivalence", invariance, 2004, pp.11, 60~72
32. Meade, A. W, "Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in test of measurement invariance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, pp.568~592 (2008)
33. Mehta, P. D, "People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling", Psychological Methods, 10, pp.259~284 (2005)
34. Mellenbergh, G. J, "A unidimensional latent trait model for continuous item responses", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, pp.223~237 (1994)
35. Millsap, R. E, "Four unresolved problems in studies of factorial invariance, in Contemporary psychometrics", pp.153~172 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
36. Muthén, B. O, "Some uses of structural equation modeling in validity studies: Extending IRT to external variables, in Test Validity", pp.213~238 (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum
37. Muthén, B. O, "Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus" (2002), University of California and Muthén & Muthén
38. Muthén, B. O., "Instructionally sensitive psychometrics: Application of a new IRT-based detection technique to mathematics achievement test items", Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, pp.1~22 (1991)
39. Muthén, L.K, "Mplus user’s guide. (6th Ed.)" (1998), Muthén & Muthén
40. Navas-Ara, M. J, "Effects of ability scale purification on identification of DIF", European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, pp.9~15 (2002)
41. Raju, N. S., "Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, pp.517~529 (2002)
42. Raudenbush, S. W, "Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.)" (2002), Sage
43. Reise, S. P, "Confirmatory Factor Analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance", Psychological Bulletin, 114, pp.552~566 (1993)
44. STAT 9.2 user's guide, "SAS", pp.2002, SAS Institute
45. Samejima,F, "Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores", Psychometrika Monographs, No. 17, ~ (1969)
46. Sörbom,D, "A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups", British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, pp.229~239 (1974)
47. Stark, S, "Examining the effects of differential item", test functioning (DIF, Journal of Applied Psychology, pp.2004, 89[DOI]
48. Stark, S., "Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy", Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, pp.1292~1306 (2006)
49. Teresi,J.A, "Overview of quantitative measurement methods: Equivalence, invariance, and differential item functioning in health applications", Medical Care, 44, pp.39~49 (2006)
50. Vandenberg, R. J, "A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research", Organizational Research Methods, 3, pp.4~69 (2000)
51. Woods,C.M, "Evaluation of MIMIC-model methods for DIF testing with comparison to two-group anlaysis", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, pp.1~27 (2009)
52. Woods,C.M, "Testing for differential item functioning with measures of partial association", Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, pp.538~554 (2009)
53. Woods, C. M., "Testing for nonuniform differential item functioning with multiple indictor multiple cause models", Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, pp.339~361 (2011)
54. Woods, C. M, "Illustration of MIMIC-Model DIF Testing with the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality", Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31, pp.320~330 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천