본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

응답 일치 여부와 면접 대상자의 인구학적 특성의 연관성: 2014년지역사회건강조사 자료 활용

Association between Response Concordance and Demographic Characteristics in 2014 Community Health Survey, Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: The response concordance between interviewer-assisted interviews and telephone survey was introduced in the Community Health Survey for the quality control and examining the association between the response concordance and related variables is required. Methods: Total 22,665 were participated in the 2014 Community Health Survey, Korea. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the response concordance for the five questions; self-rated health status (SRH), car driving, sleep time, health check-ups, and doctors diagnosed hypertension (DDH). Response concordance was investigated by gender, age (19-39, 40-64, 65-74, ≥75), residential areas (urban, rural), comorbidity, and interval period (<6 days, 6 days ≤) defined as the different days between interviewer-assisted interviews and telephone survey. Results: Women (12,658, 55.9%), urban residents (15,486, 68.3%), age 40-64 years (10,732, 47.4%), and comorbidities (6,911, 30.5%) were predominant among study population. The association of SRH were observed for women [1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14)] and age group 40-64 [0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.85)], 65-74 [0.60 (95% CI, 0.55-0.66)], ≥75 [0.43 (95% CI, 0.38-0.48)], rural [0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89)], and comorbidities [0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04)]. Gradual decrease in car driving was observed by the age groups 40-64 [1.43 (95% CI, 1.17-1.74)], 65-74 [1.78 (95% CI, 1.32-2.40)], and ≥75 [1.87 (95% CI, 1.29-2.70)]. The variables showing significant association with the interval period (6 days ≤) were SRH [0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.93)] and sleep time [0.85 (95% CI, 0.77-0.93)], and rural area residents showed lower response concordance with SRH [0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89)], sleep time [0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.70)], health check-ups [0.90 (95% CI, 0.83- 0.99)], and DDH [0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.80)] except for car driving [1.21 (95% CI, 0.90-1.26)]. Conclusions: The factors associated with the response concordance varied and having comprehensive understanding about the survey is necessary to assess the quality of the data.

Abstract

Objectives: The response concordance between interviewer-assisted interviews and telephone survey was introduced in the Community Health Survey for the quality control and examining the association between the response concordance and related variables is required. Methods: Total 22,665 were participated in the 2014 Community Health Survey, Korea. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the response concordance for the five questions; self-rated health status (SRH), car driving, sleep time, health check-ups, and doctors diagnosed hypertension (DDH). Response concordance was investigated by gender, age (19-39, 40-64, 65-74, ≥75), residential areas (urban, rural), comorbidity, and interval period (<6 days, 6 days ≤) defined as the different days between interviewer-assisted interviews and telephone survey. Results: Women (12,658, 55.9%), urban residents (15,486, 68.3%), age 40-64 years (10,732, 47.4%), and comorbidities (6,911, 30.5%) were predominant among study population. The association of SRH were observed for women [1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14)] and age group 40-64 [0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.85)], 65-74 [0.60 (95% CI, 0.55-0.66)], ≥75 [0.43 (95% CI, 0.38-0.48)], rural [0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89)], and comorbidities [0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04)]. Gradual decrease in car driving was observed by the age groups 40-64 [1.43 (95% CI, 1.17-1.74)], 65-74 [1.78 (95% CI, 1.32-2.40)], and ≥75 [1.87 (95% CI, 1.29-2.70)]. The variables showing significant association with the interval period (6 days ≤) were SRH [0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.93)] and sleep time [0.85 (95% CI, 0.77-0.93)], and rural area residents showed lower response concordance with SRH [0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89)], sleep time [0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.70)], health check-ups [0.90 (95% CI, 0.83- 0.99)], and DDH [0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.80)] except for car driving [1.21 (95% CI, 0.90-1.26)]. Conclusions: The factors associated with the response concordance varied and having comprehensive understanding about the survey is necessary to assess the quality of the data.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. Community Health Survey Plan, 2007, "Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention", Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ~ (2008)
  2. 김종희, "2008년 지역사회건강조사 질관리정도 평가", 보건정보통계학회지, 35(2), pp.87~100 (2010), 한국보건정보통계학회
  3. Statistics Canada, "Statistics Canada’s quality assurance framework", Statistics Canada, ~ (2002)
  4. Community health survey pilot project internal data, "Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention", Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ~ (2008)
  5. Community health survey quality control monitoring and evaluation, "Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention", Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ~ (2014)
  6. Coughlin SS, "Recall bias in epidemiologic studies", J Clin Epidemiol, 43(1), pp.87~91 (1990)
  7. Paganini-Hill A, "Reliability of recall of drug usage and other health-related information", Am J Epidemiol, 116(1), pp.114~122 (1982)
  8. Stolley PD, "Agreement rates between oral-contraceptive users and prescribers in relation to drug-use histories", Am J Epidemiol, 107(3), pp.226~235 (1978)
  9. Wu CS, "Concordance between patient self-reports and claims data on clinical diagnoses, medication use, and health system utilization in Taiwan", PLoS One, 9(12), pp.e112257~ (2014)
  10. Last JM, "A dictionary of epidemiology", pp.153~ (2000), Oxford University Press
  11. Schmier JK, "Patient recall and recall bias of health state and health status", Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 4(2), pp.159~163 (2004)
  12. Telephone inspection report for 2014 community health survey, "Embrain M", ~ (2014)
  13. 2014 Community health survey question guidance, "Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention", Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, ~ (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of estimates and time series stability of Korea Community Health Survey and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey김호, 기지선한국역학회 · Epidemiology and Health2019 · 제41권 Factors Affecting the Validity of Self-Reported Data on Health Services from the Community Health Survey in Korea강길원, 김빛나, 김형수, 이건세, 이민정, 이정현, 장성훈, 정효선, 탁양주연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2013 · 제54권 제4호지역사회건강조사의 자가보고 키, 몸무게 그리고 체질량지수의 정확성김건엽, 김동현, 류소연, 박용순, 이순영, 정진영한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2017 · 제42권 제3호경상남도 지역사회 건강조사 자료 추정치의 변동성 검정(2008-2018)김동욱, 선영준, 손영은, 임정훈, 정백근, 조창진, 진보영한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2023 · 제48권 제3호2008년 지역사회건강조사 질관리정도 평가김호, 강양화, 김윤아, 김정숙, 김종희, 박해용, 임도상, 임현술, 탁양주한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2010 · 제35권 제2호우리나라 주요 건강조사 데이터의 특성 및 주요 만성질환 지표 비교: 2022년 국민건강영양조사, 지역사회건강조사를 중심으로김명하, 문준현, 이상민, 이서영, 정경인, 정채윤서비스사이언스학회 · 서비스 연구2025 · 제15권 제01호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)