西晉 杜預의 服喪論과 『左傳注』 의혹

Abstract

Du Yu(222-284) was involved in the argument about the memorial service for parents in 274. At issue was the matter when emperor and prince should remove of mourning clothes and what to do after removal. At that times the royal family followed the existing system ‘the removal of mourning for official affairs just after burial’(旣葬公除). Only Wu-di(武帝) practiced the ‘in-mind mourning(心喪)’ for remaining of three years mourning after removal. Du Yu advocated in that argument two points. First, the mourning system of ‘removal of mourning for official affairs just after burial’ had been an old institution from the Shang(商) peeriod. Second, Gojong(高宗) of Shang had practiced mourning in silence for remaining of three years after removal, and entrusted prime minister with pull power of administration of the state, referred to as ‘liangan(諒闇)’. But some inconsistency were found in historical materials on Du Yu‘s argument and his points of view. Even in one material the content was contradictory to each other. This research is initiated to explain the matter of inconsistency. The best material to indicate clearly Du Yu‘s points of view is the Lizhi (禮志) in Chinese Official Historiography Jinshu (晉書), witch contained Du Yu’s argument in 274. On the basis of the Lizhi I try a new interpretation of related sentences in Du Yu’s Annotation on Spring and Autumn Annals (春秋左傳) and to solve the matter of contradiction. This reserch is carried out as a part of the study on Du Yu’s argument of liangan(諒闇).