본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

秦漢代 奏讞文書의 被告 진술을 통해 본 기층사회의 實相

Picturing The Reality of the Lower Strata from the Testimonies of the Defendants in the Zouyan Documents

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This article has analyzed the testimonies of the defendants recorded in Zouyan 奏讞 documents that are legal precedents of the Qin-Han. Accordingly, through the testimonies of the defendants (a total of 37) recorded in newly excavated texts of the Yuelü 嶽麓 Qin Manuscripts and the Zhangjiashan 張家山 Han Manuscripts, the article tried to delineate diverse images of the people of the lower strata who actively responded to the legal forces of state power of the Qin-Han and sought for various solutions to manage their life. First of all, the article has mentioned that the testimony of the defendant is sequentially constituted: an initial statement of the defendant's personal information and one's parol on the case, answering the questions of the judge, and finally admitting one's guilt. Using this analysis as a base, the article studied data such as the defendants' name, their status, whether the testimony is provided or not, and the punishment of each of the cases. If we divide the various defendant's status into officials (guan 官), commoners (min 民), and slaves (nu 奴), we can argue that there was a difference in the level of state control over the people according to their status during the eras of Qin and early Han. The crimes in the two corpus of Zouyan documents can be classified into types such as bandits (qundao 群盜), murder (zeisha 賊殺), murder or wounding related to theft (盜殺傷), theft (daozang 盜贓), renegades (taowang 逃亡), sexual-crimes, fraud (zhaqi 詐欺), threats (xiepo 脅迫), and counterfeit (weizao 僞造). This article has primarily focused on the bandits and ‘rebels’ (fan 反), people who used weapons and directly resisted to state power, and the renegades (wang 亡), people who ran away state power. This was because these were the most active ways of responding to state power for the people who were at the opposite side of the forceful impositions. Thus, the article regards that although the "mountains and valleys" (shangu 山谷) - spaces where the renegade bandits and rebels took shelter - were independent spaces completely departed from the boundaries of state power, these spaces provide stories that can delineate the effects of law not just one but in a two-sided way that cannot be read merely by reading the legal codes per ce. In this regard, the article attempted to search for the existence of diverse histories related to commoners who turned their backs on the legal governance of state power and the history of their resistance towards state power. These histories are not ‘inscribed’ on the historical narratives of the traditional ‘sources.’ This article also focused on the market (shi 市), which is the space where people ‘desire and aspire’ (yüwang 慾望). This was because the article has regarded the market as a space where the desires and aspirations of the people meet and aggregate. Indeed, we can observe from the legal precedents of the Zouyan documents that although on the one hand the markets were producers of state income through the lawful trades and accumulation of profits, they were also spaces that crimes such as murder, robbery, theft, threat, and fraud, which were unlawful but events that could happen anytime in the human-society, were committed in a daily basis. Therefore this article regarded cases pertaining to the market, which is the space where the ‘desires and aspirations’ aggregate and collide, can be used as a prism to read the active responses of the receiver (which did not discriminate the usages of lawful or unlawful measures and aimed at securing one's survival and benefits) against the forceful transmitting of state law.

Abstract

This article has analyzed the testimonies of the defendants recorded in Zouyan 奏讞 documents that are legal precedents of the Qin-Han. Accordingly, through the testimonies of the defendants (a total of 37) recorded in newly excavated texts of the Yuelü 嶽麓 Qin Manuscripts and the Zhangjiashan 張家山 Han Manuscripts, the article tried to delineate diverse images of the people of the lower strata who actively responded to the legal forces of state power of the Qin-Han and sought for various solutions to manage their life. First of all, the article has mentioned that the testimony of the defendant is sequentially constituted: an initial statement of the defendant's personal information and one's parol on the case, answering the questions of the judge, and finally admitting one's guilt. Using this analysis as a base, the article studied data such as the defendants' name, their status, whether the testimony is provided or not, and the punishment of each of the cases. If we divide the various defendant's status into officials (guan 官), commoners (min 民), and slaves (nu 奴), we can argue that there was a difference in the level of state control over the people according to their status during the eras of Qin and early Han. The crimes in the two corpus of Zouyan documents can be classified into types such as bandits (qundao 群盜), murder (zeisha 賊殺), murder or wounding related to theft (盜殺傷), theft (daozang 盜贓), renegades (taowang 逃亡), sexual-crimes, fraud (zhaqi 詐欺), threats (xiepo 脅迫), and counterfeit (weizao 僞造). This article has primarily focused on the bandits and ‘rebels’ (fan 反), people who used weapons and directly resisted to state power, and the renegades (wang 亡), people who ran away state power. This was because these were the most active ways of responding to state power for the people who were at the opposite side of the forceful impositions. Thus, the article regards that although the "mountains and valleys" (shangu 山谷) - spaces where the renegade bandits and rebels took shelter - were independent spaces completely departed from the boundaries of state power, these spaces provide stories that can delineate the effects of law not just one but in a two-sided way that cannot be read merely by reading the legal codes per ce. In this regard, the article attempted to search for the existence of diverse histories related to commoners who turned their backs on the legal governance of state power and the history of their resistance towards state power. These histories are not ‘inscribed’ on the historical narratives of the traditional ‘sources.’ This article also focused on the market (shi 市), which is the space where people ‘desire and aspire’ (yüwang 慾望). This was because the article has regarded the market as a space where the desires and aspirations of the people meet and aggregate. Indeed, we can observe from the legal precedents of the Zouyan documents that although on the one hand the markets were producers of state income through the lawful trades and accumulation of profits, they were also spaces that crimes such as murder, robbery, theft, threat, and fraud, which were unlawful but events that could happen anytime in the human-society, were committed in a daily basis. Therefore this article regarded cases pertaining to the market, which is the space where the ‘desires and aspirations’ aggregate and collide, can be used as a prism to read the active responses of the receiver (which did not discriminate the usages of lawful or unlawful measures and aimed at securing one's survival and benefits) against the forceful transmitting of state law.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. "史記", ~
  2. "漢書", ~
  3. "後漢書", ~
  4. "晉書", 등 문헌사료(쪽수는 中華書局標點本에 기준), ~
  5. 張家山二四七號漢墓竹簡整理小組, "張家山漢墓竹簡" (2001), 文物出版社
  6. 張家山二四七號漢墓竹簡整理小組, "(釋文修訂本)" (2006), 文物出版社
  7. 彭浩, "二年律令與奏讞書 張家山二四七號漢墓出土法律文獻釋讀" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
  8. 朱漢民, "岳麓書院藏秦簡(參)" (2013), 上海辭書出版社
  9. 陳松長, "嶽麓書院藏秦簡(肆)" (2015), 上海辭書出版社
  10. 睡虎地秦墓竹簡整理小組, "睡虎地秦墓竹簡" (1978), 文物出版社
  11. 陳偉, "秦簡牘合集 釋文注釋修訂本(壹)" (2016), 武漢大學出版社
  12. 박건주, "中國古代社會의 法律" (2008), 백산자료원
  13. 池田雄一, "奏讞書" (2002), 刀水書房
  14. 池田雄一, "漢代を遡る奏讞―中國古代の裁判記錄" (2015), 汲古書院
  15. 蔡萬進, "張家山漢簡奏讞書硏究" (2006), 廣西師範大學出版社
  16. Anthony Barbieri-Low, "Law State and Society in Early Imperial China Volume Ⅱ" (2015), BRILL
  17. Ulrich Lau, "Legal Practice in the Formative Stages of the Chinese Empire" (2016), Brill
  18. 이성규, "秦의 地方行政組織과 그 性格", 東洋史學硏究, 31 (1989)
  19. 이성구, "中國古代의 市의 槪念과 機能", 東洋史學硏究, 36 (1991)
  20. 박건주, "江陵張家山漢簡의 奏讞書에 보이는 秦漢의 更繇制", 歷史學硏究, 14 (1996)
  21. 이성규, "古代中國의 理解 3" (1997), 지식산업사
  22. 李守德, "秦漢 時期의 治獄 過程-江陵張家山『奏?書』를 中心으로", 중국사연구, 21, pp.1~52 (2002), 중국사학회
  23. 이수덕, "秦漢時期의 법률해석― 秦簡과 奏書의 或曰을 중심으로 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (16), pp.227~264 (2006), 중국고중세사학회
  24. 이성원, "고대 중국의 ‘市井’과 그 空間", 중국학보, (58), pp.171~200 (2008), 한국중국학회
  25. 금재원, "秦 통치시기 ‘楚地’의 形勢와 南郡의 지역성", 중국고중세사연구, (31), pp.167~215 (2014), 중국고중세사학회
  26. 김민지, "戰國秦ㆍ漢初 奏讞制度-『張家山漢簡』「奏讞書」ㆍ『嶽麓秦簡』「爲獄等狀四種」을 중심으로-", 碩士, pp.2015
  27. 김진우, "秦漢時期 戶籍類 公文書의 運用과 그 實態", 동양사학연구, (131), pp.1~28 (2015), 동양사학회[DOI]
  28. 김경호, "秦漢法律簡牘의 內容과 그 성격 - 『嶽麓書院藏秦簡』(參)ㆍ(肆)의 내용 분석을 겸하여 -", 중국고중세사연구, (42), pp.189~238 (2016), 중국고중세사학회
  29. 李學勤, "奏讞書解說(上)", 文物, (8) (1993)
  30. 李學勤, "奏讞書解說(下)", 文物, (3) (1995)
  31. 彭浩, "談《奏讞書》中的西漢案例", 文物, (8) (1993)
  32. 彭浩, "談《奏讞書》中秦代和東周時期的案例", 文物, (3) (1995)
  33. 蔡萬進, "張家山漢簡《奏讞書》釋文補正舉隅", 古籍整理研究學刊, (2) (2006)
  34. 蔡萬進, "奏와 漢代의 奏制度", 중국고중세사연구, (16), pp.77~106 (2006), 중국고중세사학회
  35. 蔡萬進, "張家山漢簡《奏讞書》法律地位探析", 南都學壇, (2) (2007)
  36. 曾代偉, "《蠻夷律》考略——從一樁疑案說起", 民族研究, (3) (2004)
  37. 劉向明, "張家山漢簡《奏讞書》所見漢初對官吏犯罪的懲處", 嘉應學院學報, (4) (2004)
  38. 陳如娟, "從出土文獻看秦漢時期的刑事偵查制度", 河南公安高等專科學校學報, (2) (2006)
  39. 趙科學, "“毋憂案是樁冤案”辨析—張家山漢簡《奏讞書》研究之二", 江漢考古, (3) (2007)
  40. 陳松長, "嶽麓書院所藏秦簡綜述", 文物, (3) (2009)
  41. 陳偉, "“江胡”與“州陵”——嶽麓書院藏秦簡中的兩個地名初考", 中國歷史地理論叢, (1) (2010)
  42. 宋耀春, "试析“不知何人刺女子婢最里中”案刑事侦查手段", 丝绸之路, (6) (2010)
  43. 王勇, "“走馬”爲秦爵小考", 湖南大學學報(社會科學版), (4) (2010)
  44. 張銘, "《奏讞書》中的秦漢逃亡犯罪案件", 法制史研究, 21 (2012)
  45. 岳麓書院藏秦簡整理小組, "岳麓書院藏秦簡爲獄等狀四種槪述", 文物, (5) (2013)
  46. 万荣, "秦汉简牍自告自出再辨析—兼论自诣自首", 江汉论坛, (8) (2013)
  47. 劳武利, "張家山漢簡奏讞書與嶽麓書院秦簡爲獄等狀四種的初步比較,", 湖南大學學報(社會科學版), (3) (2013)
  48. 陶安, "《为狱等状四种》标题简“奏”字字解订正—兼论张家山汉简《奏谳书》题名问题", 中國古代法律文獻硏究, 8 (2014)
  49. 周海锋, "《为狱等状四种》中的“吏议”与“邦亡”", 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 28(4) (2014)
  50. 杨振红, "南郡卒史复攸等狱簿”再解读", 中國古代法律文獻硏究, 8 (2014)
  51. 水间大辅, "岳麓书院藏秦简“尸等捕盗疑购”案所见逮捕群盗的奖赏规定", 中国社会经济史研究, (3) (2014)
  52. 朱德贵, "岳麓秦简奏谳文书商业问题新证", 社會科學, (11) (2014)
  53. 王彦輝, "秦簡“識劫』案”發微", 古代文明, (1) (2015)
  54. 时军军, "岳麓秦简“尸等捕盗疑购案”购赏辨析", 肇庆学院学报, (6) (2015)
  55. 陳契, "嶽麓簡“識劫案”與戰國家庭組織中的依附民", 出土文獻硏究, 14 (2015)
  56. 沈剛, "新出秦简所见秦代市场与商人探讨", 中国社会经济史研究, (1) (2016)
  57. 籾山明, "爰書新探――漢代訴訟論のために――", 東洋史研究, 51(3) (1992)
  58. 飯島和俊, "秦漢交替期の亡人の發生とそ追捕-秦律ㆍ奏讞書から見た社會變動-", アジア史における制度と社會-アジア史硏究, (20) (1996)
  59. 飯島和俊, "アジア史における法と国家" (2000), 中央大学出版部
  60. 飯島和俊, "秦漢交替期の雇用関係─ 江陵張家山漢簡『奏讞書』案例22に見えるの它県人来乗庸をてがかりとして─", 唐代史研究, 3 (2000)
  61. 飯島和俊, "秦漢時代の軍制──張家山漢簡奏讞書に散見する走士と走馬を手がかりとして──", 中央大学アジア史研究, 24 (2000)
  62. 学習院大学漢簡硏究會, "秦代盜牛ㆍ逃亡事件―江陵張家山漢簡『奏讞書』を讀む―", 学習院史学, 38 (2000)
  63. 陶安あんど, "嶽麓秦簡司法文書集成『爲獄等狀四種』譯註稿-事案一-", 法史學硏究會會報, 17 (2012)
  64. 陶安あんど, "嶽麓秦簡司法文書集成『爲獄等狀四種』譯註稿-事案二-", 法史學硏究會會報, 18 (2014)
  65. 柿沼陽平, "岳麓書院蔵秦簡訳注― 為獄等状四種案例七識劫案", 帝京史學, 30 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)