『御定宋史筌』의 편찬 및 체재에 관한 연구

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to systematically reveal the compilation process of 80 volumes of Songsajeon and 100 volumes and 150 volumes of Eojeonsongsajeon by utilizing literature research and actual research to present basic data for bibliographic literature research. To this end, 80 volumes of Songsajeon examine the records of Ilsungrok and Jeongjo’s Eochal and the existing research to reveal the people and processes involved in the excerpt, editing, and proofreading. 100 volumes and 150 volumes of Eojeonsongsajeon is analyzed for each compilation and format by examining records of Annals of King Jeongjo, Hongjaejeonseo and literary works, existing research and existing texts, and examines in detail what kind of compilation process the Eojeonsongsajeon was completed. As a result of the analysis, the excerpt, editing and proofreading of 80 volumes of Songsajeon was Jeongjo. Jeongjo began on January 3rd, 46th year of King Yeongjo (1770), and completed the excerpt, editing, and correction of the case on August 25th of that year. Bonki and Ji were excerpted and corrected, and only excerpts were made for Yeoljeon. In the 48th year of King Yeongjo (1772), the excerpt was corrected in consultation with Hong, Bong-han, and Seogi was consulted with Hong, Nak-in and Yurimjeon was also consulted with Hong, Nak-shin. 100 volumes of Eojeonsongsajeon are based on the Seolye (序例) compiled by Jeongjo, and the total editorial responsibility was taken by Seo, Myeong-eung, and on October 10, the 4th year of King Jeongjo (1780). It consisted of 100 volumes and 40 books, including Bonki 4, Ji 34, and Sega 4, Yeoljeon 56, Uilye 1, Moglog 1. This book is composed of Bonki, Ji, Sega, and Yeoljeon. 150 volumes of Eojeonsongsajeon were revised and completed by Lee, Deok-moo, and completed in the 15th year of King Jeongjo by alternately transcribing the students of the government school. It consisted of 150 volumes and 61 books, including Uilye 1, Moglog 1. Bonki 8, Ji 47, Sega 2, Yeoljeon 91. This completed version is Eojeonsongsajeon of 奎1800 that remains in Gyujanggak. The results of this study were very meaningful in the fields of bibliography, records management and history. This result is expected to be used as basic data for those who study the history of literature in the Yeong-Jeongjo period.