본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유럽 주요 국가 해상풍력 입지 선정 과정에서 생태계 영향을 평가하는 제도와 한국에 주는 함의

Schemes for Assessing Ecosystem Impacts in the Offshore Wind Siting Processes of European Countries and Implications for Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타공학

초록

This study examines how ecological impacts are addressed in the siting processes of European countries that are international leaders in offshore wind energy, and draws implications for Korea. The United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmark are the countries with the most offshore wind installations after China. These European countries conduct strategic environmental assessments (SEAs) and appropriate assessments (AAs) at both the overall site planning stage and the individual site decision stage to evaluate ecological impacts from offshore wind power. In the UK, the SEA and AA for offshore wind are conducted separately at different stages of the siting process. Germany has three siting stages, and the Netherlands and Denmark have two siting stages, each of which includes both an SEA and an AA. Compared to the SEA, which assesses overall ecological impacts, the AA is limited to impacts on Natura 2000 sites, a network of protected areas for species and habitats. The ecological impacts of offshore wind are examined for birds, bats, marine mammals, fish, and benthic organisms.

Abstract

This study examines how ecological impacts are addressed in the siting processes of European countries that are international leaders in offshore wind energy, and draws implications for Korea. The United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmark are the countries with the most offshore wind installations after China. These European countries conduct strategic environmental assessments (SEAs) and appropriate assessments (AAs) at both the overall site planning stage and the individual site decision stage to evaluate ecological impacts from offshore wind power. In the UK, the SEA and AA for offshore wind are conducted separately at different stages of the siting process. Germany has three siting stages, and the Netherlands and Denmark have two siting stages, each of which includes both an SEA and an AA. Compared to the SEA, which assesses overall ecological impacts, the AA is limited to impacts on Natura 2000 sites, a network of protected areas for species and habitats. The ecological impacts of offshore wind are examined for birds, bats, marine mammals, fish, and benthic organisms.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. IRENA, "World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023: 1.5℃ Pathway", ~ (2023)
  2. Global Offshore Wind Report 2024, "GWEC", ~ (2024)
  3. Jack, T. M., "Offshore Wind Energy Permitting Processes in the European Union: An Examination of Danish, German, Scottish and Swedish Offshore Permitting Processes and Case Study of Acoustic Impact on Marine Mammals", ~ (2022)
  4. Galparsoro, I., "Reviewing the Ecological Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms", npj Ocean Sustainability, 1(1) (2022)
  5. de Vasconcelos, R. M., "Environmental Licensing for Offshore Wind Farms: Guidelines and Policy Implications for New Markets", Energy Policy, (171), pp.113248~ (2022)
  6. Yim, H. S., "Comparison of site selection procedures for offshore wind farms in the Netherlands and Japan", Journal of Wind Energy, 12(4), pp.35~46 (2021)
  7. Kim, S. H., "A comparative analysis of the priority and evaluation factors of the renewable energy plan site by country", New. Renew. Energy, 18(4), pp.54~63 (2022)
  8. Kim, R. W., "Site Development of Offshore Wind Power in Korea - Comparison between Jeju, Buan, and Ulsan", New &Renewable Energy, 18(4), pp.22~37 (2022)
  9. Im, H. J., "Challenges and Improvements in the Community Participation System for Renewable Energy in Korea: Focusing on Distributive and Procedural Engag", Environmental Law and Policy, 31(1), pp.91~123 (2023)
  10. Ahn, S. H., "Institutional Solution to Complex Conflicts in the Site Selection Process of Offshore Wind Power - from a Multi-level Governance Perspective", 19(2), pp.40~58 (2023)
  11. Slootweg, R, "Biodiversity in Environmental Assessment" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  12. European Union, "Managing Natura 2000sites - The Provisions of Article 6 of the ‘Habitats’ Directive 92", 43, pp.2019, ~
  13. "Marine Protected Areas in Europe's Seas" (2023)[URL]
  14. "Marine Protection by Country" (2023)[URL]
  15. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, "UK Offshore Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment", ~ (2022)
  16. The Crown Estate, "A Guide to Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) for Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4", ~ (2022)
  17. Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4 Plan Level HRA, "The Crown Estate", ~ (2022)
  18. Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment - Offshore Wind Leasing Round 4Plan Level HRA, "NIRAS", ~ (2022)
  19. The Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, "Spatial Plan for the German Exclusive Economic Zone in the North Sea and in the Baltic Sea", ~ (2021)
  20. The Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, "Environmental Report on the Maritime Spatial Plan for the German Exclusive Economic zone in the North Sea", ~ (2021)
  21. Environmental Report on the Site Development Plan 2023 for the German North Sea, "The Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency", ~ (2023)
  22. Environmental Report for the Suitability Assessment of Site N-3.8, "The Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency", ~ (2020)
  23. Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, "Scope and Level of Detail Memorandum for the Environmental Impact Assessment for the National Water Program 2022-2027", ~ (2022)
  24. Plan Environmental Impact Assessment for the National Water Program 2022-2027, "ARCADIS", Department of Infrastructure and Water Management, ~ (2021)
  25. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy, "Letter to Parliament Ministerial Order granting offshore energy permits sites VI VII Hollandse Kust west Wind Farm Zone", ~ (2021)
  26. Framework for Assessing Ecological and Cumulative Effects (KEC) 4.0 for the Roll-out of Offshore Wind Energy and Wind Farm Zones, "Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management", ~ (2022)
  27. Supplementary Plan Environmental Impact Assessment for the Additional draft North Sea Program 2022-2027, "PONDERA", Department of Infrastructure and Water Management, ~ (2021)
  28. PONDERA,, "MORE rolling pin VI Wind Energy Area Hollandse Kust (west)", Ministries of Economic Affairs and Climate, Home Affairs and Kingdom Relations, and Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, ~ (2020)
  29. Appropriate Assessment for the National Water Program 2022-2027, "ARCADIS", Department of Infrastructure and Water Management, ~ (2021)
  30. Appropriate Assessment Holland Coast (west) Lot VI, "PONDERA,", Ministries of Economic Affairs and Climate, Home Affairs and Kingdom Relations, and Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, ~ (2020)
  31. Strategic Environmental Assessment of Denmark’s Maritime Spatial Plan, "COWI", ~ (2021)
  32. Natura 2000 - Impact Assessment of the Danish Maritime Spatial Plan, "COWI", ~ (2021)
  33. Environmental Assessment of the Plan for Thor, Interim Report 2: Environment at Sea, "The Danish Energy Agency", ~ (2021)
  34. Global Offshore Wind Report 2022, "GWEC", ~ (2022)
  35. "German Wind Power:Solutions for Permitting Delays" (2023)[URL]
  36. Yook, K. H., "A Study on Sea Area Utilization Consultation of Offshore Wind Farms in Korea - Focusing on the Assessment Items of the Consultation System", Ocean Policy Research, 37(2), pp.205~242 (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)