해상풍력 개발 과정의 이해관계자 상충 해결을 위한 프레임워크 연구
A Framework Study for Resolving Stakeholder Conflicts in the Offshore Wind Development Process
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Offshore wind development in Korea has been delayed due to complex permitting procedures and conflicts among developers, fishers, and government ministries. This study proposes a site selection framework using GIS-based exclusion analysis that integrates marine spatial data produced by government and public agencies. The framework considers primary factors such as water depth and wind speed, and additional factors including offshore wind permit status, metocean instruments, fishing effort density, and total catch. Ten scenarios were developed by combining turbine types (fixed-bottom and floating) with planning priorities (economic feasibility vs. social acceptance). The results show that scenarios prioritizing economic feasibility yield broader candidate areas, while those incorporating social acceptance significantly reduce site availability. Differentiated weighting of fishing effort density and total catch illustrates how site selection outcomes shift depending on whether emphasis is placed on spatial fishing intensity or fisheries productivity. The framework is expandable as a web-based platform to support multi-stakeholder pre-consultation and is expected to contribute as a technical foundation for the Site Information System mandated by the Offshore Wind Power Act (Articles 12 and 14).
Abstract
Offshore wind development in Korea has been delayed due to complex permitting procedures and conflicts among developers, fishers, and government ministries. This study proposes a site selection framework using GIS-based exclusion analysis that integrates marine spatial data produced by government and public agencies. The framework considers primary factors such as water depth and wind speed, and additional factors including offshore wind permit status, metocean instruments, fishing effort density, and total catch. Ten scenarios were developed by combining turbine types (fixed-bottom and floating) with planning priorities (economic feasibility vs. social acceptance). The results show that scenarios prioritizing economic feasibility yield broader candidate areas, while those incorporating social acceptance significantly reduce site availability. Differentiated weighting of fishing effort density and total catch illustrates how site selection outcomes shift depending on whether emphasis is placed on spatial fishing intensity or fisheries productivity. The framework is expandable as a web-based platform to support multi-stakeholder pre-consultation and is expected to contribute as a technical foundation for the Site Information System mandated by the Offshore Wind Power Act (Articles 12 and 14).