본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해양관할권의 확대에 대한 해양강대국과 연안국의 대립 - 영해제도의 역사와 현대적 의의를 중심으로 -

Conflict over Maritime Creeping Jurisdiction between Maritime Powers and Coastal States : With Special Reference to the History of the Territorial Sea and Its Modern Significance

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

이 논문은 해양강대국과 연안국의 대립과 타협이라는 관점에서 영해제도의 역사적 발전과 그에 대한 현대적 의의를 고찰한 것이다. 구체적으로, 영해제도의 성립과정 및 그 범위에 대한 갈등을 살펴보고, 이어서 국제정치적 내지 역사적 맥락에서 영미 양국과 중국의 영해제도 수용과정을 고찰하여 해양법의 현대적 의미를 평가했다. 영해제도는 해양관할권 확대의 상징으로서 해양법의 역사적 발전과 함께 정착했기 때문에 그 중요성을 간과할 수 없다.

Abstract

Maritime powers and coastal states have long been opposed to each other over the legal status and the breadth of the territorial sea. The conflict over territorial seas was settled by the 1982 United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea. It could be said that the territorial sea regime was developed together with the history of the law of the sea. Taking into account this background, this article deals with conflict over maritime creeping jurisdiction between maritime powers and coastal states from the historical viewpoint of the territorial sea regime as well as its modern significance. Specifically, this article examines the history of the territorial sea regime, attempts to fix the breadth of the territorial sea, and discusses conflict between maritime powers and coastal states. With regard to conflict between maritime powers and coastal states,the United Kingdom, the United States, and China are forwarded as examples. Both the United Kingdom and the United States have been traditional maritime powers for centuries, while China has been a continental power for a long time. However, China has been changing into a maritime power recently. It remains to be seen how China will alter its maritime policy. China is a significant point for observing the context of changing maritime circumstances.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Brownlie, Ian, "Principles of Public International Law", ~ (1998)
  2. Churchill, R. R, "The Law of the Sea", ~ (1999)
  3. Fenn, Jr, Percy Thomas, "Origins of the Theory of Territorial Waters", American Journal of International Law, 20(3) (1926)
  4. 11 World: Security and Creeping Jurisdiction in The Law of the Sea-Progress and Prospects, "Freedom of Navigation in a Post 9", pp.2006, Kaye, Stwart
  5. Kent, H. S. K., "The Historical Origins of the Three-Mile Limit", American Journal of International Law, 48(4) (1954)
  6. Moore, John B., "A Digest of International Law", ~ (1906)
  7. Murphy, John F., "The United States and the Rule of Law in International Affairs", ~ (2004)
  8. O’Connell, D. P., "International Law of the Sea , Vol.1", ~ (1982)
  9. Remy, Carol Elizabeth, "U.S. Territorial Sea Extension: Jurisdiction and International Environmental Protection", Fordham International Law Journal, 16(4) (1992)
  10. Sohn, Louis B, "Cases and Materials on the Law of the Sea", ~ (2004)
  11. UN Department of Public Information, "Background Papers on the New UN Convention on the Law of the Sea", ~ (1982)
  12. Zhiguo Gao, "China and the LOS Convention", Marine Policy, 15(3) (1991)
  13. Zou Keyuan, "Building a Marine Legal System in China", China’s Marine Legal System and the Law of the Sea, ~
  14. 加藤信行, "近代海洋法法典化の試み-ハーグ國際法典編纂會議·近代海洋法から現代海洋法への架け橋" (2004), 海洋法の歷史的展開
  15. 古賀衛, "近代海洋法の發展過程" (2004), 海洋法の歷史的展開

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)