본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대 일본 ‘대륙정책’의 구조 -타이완 출병 문제를 중심으로 -

The Structure of the Continental Policy of Modern Japan - Discussion on the Troops Dispatch to Taiwan -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This paper gives consideration to the continental policy of the Japanese government in the early Meiji Era and studies the structures of international and domestic politics behind the policy with the troops dispatch to Taiwan as the main topic. The process from summer 1872,when the troops dispatch was proposed, to spring 1874, when the troops were actually sent, and summer 1874, when the Japanese government held talks with the Qing dynasty, was analyzed after issues about the sending troops to Taiwan were sorted out. The focus of this analysis was to reveal the characteristics of those in charge of diplomacy and their ideas, and the dynamics among countries when the ideas took form as a tangible policy. They combined the logic of international law which was also the international order of the Western Europe at that time and the traditional international order of the East Asia to come up with a theory to justify the invasion. Taneomi Soejima who was in charge of diplomacy with Qing in an early stage was strongly supported by an American named Le Gendre and Soejima’s diplomacy policy contained a “grand” design to expand into the continent. Toshimichi Okubo and Shigenobu Okuma who replaced Soejima limited the “expansion” to Taiwan, and a point to notice here is that they appointed a Japanese “expert” to the position. They intended to do more than punishment or sanctions against the military action and utilize it as an opportunity to reign over Taiwan. However, the plan to send troops to Taiwan faced criticism from diplomats of Britain and the United States, which drove the Japanese officials into a corner. Furthermore, the legitimacy of the invasion was rejected by Qing and the situation could turn into a war between Japan and the dynasty. The Japanese officials, based on the logic of international law and experiences of the U.S., once attempted to perpetuate the reign over the region which had not been controlled by the dynasty while “showing pride” of the nation by a military movement. But the intervention of western powers and the rejection from the Qing dynasty forced this attempt to fail.

Abstract

This paper gives consideration to the continental policy of the Japanese government in the early Meiji Era and studies the structures of international and domestic politics behind the policy with the troops dispatch to Taiwan as the main topic. The process from summer 1872,when the troops dispatch was proposed, to spring 1874, when the troops were actually sent, and summer 1874, when the Japanese government held talks with the Qing dynasty, was analyzed after issues about the sending troops to Taiwan were sorted out. The focus of this analysis was to reveal the characteristics of those in charge of diplomacy and their ideas, and the dynamics among countries when the ideas took form as a tangible policy. They combined the logic of international law which was also the international order of the Western Europe at that time and the traditional international order of the East Asia to come up with a theory to justify the invasion. Taneomi Soejima who was in charge of diplomacy with Qing in an early stage was strongly supported by an American named Le Gendre and Soejima’s diplomacy policy contained a “grand” design to expand into the continent. Toshimichi Okubo and Shigenobu Okuma who replaced Soejima limited the “expansion” to Taiwan, and a point to notice here is that they appointed a Japanese “expert” to the position. They intended to do more than punishment or sanctions against the military action and utilize it as an opportunity to reign over Taiwan. However, the plan to send troops to Taiwan faced criticism from diplomats of Britain and the United States, which drove the Japanese officials into a corner. Furthermore, the legitimacy of the invasion was rejected by Qing and the situation could turn into a war between Japan and the dynasty. The Japanese officials, based on the logic of international law and experiences of the U.S., once attempted to perpetuate the reign over the region which had not been controlled by the dynasty while “showing pride” of the nation by a military movement. But the intervention of western powers and the rejection from the Qing dynasty forced this attempt to fail.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. "舊陸海軍文書マイクロフィルムR34, 台灣事件輯錄一· 台灣事件輯錄二", ~
  2. 宮內廳, "明治天皇紀 三" (1969), 吉川弘文館
  3. 內田修道, "明治建白書集成 二" (1990), 筑摩書房
  4. 牧原憲夫, "明治建白書集成 三" (1986), 筑摩書房
  5. 岩倉公舊蹟保存會, "岩倉公實記 下" (1906), 皇后宮職
  6. 外務省, "日本外交文書 七" (1955), 日本外交文書頒布會
  7. 大久保利通日記 二, "日本史籍協會", 日本史籍協會, ~ (1927)
  8. 大久保利通文書 五, "日本史籍協會", 日本史籍協會, ~ (1928)
  9. 大久保利通文書 六, "日本史籍協會", 日本史籍協會, ~ (1928)
  10. 岩倉具視關係文書 五, "日本史籍協會", 日本史籍協會, ~ (1931)
  11. 岩倉具視關係文書 六, "日本史籍協會", 日本史籍協會, ~ (1931)
  12. 大隈重信關係文書 二, "日本史籍協會", 日本史籍協會, ~ (1933)
  13. 立敎大學日本史硏究室, "大久保利通關係文書 一" (1965), 吉川弘文館
  14. 早稲田大學大學史資料センター, "大隈重信關係文書 二" (2005), みすず書房
  15. 早稲田大學大學史資料センター, "大隈重信關係文書 六" (2010), みすず書房
  16. 早稲田大學圖書館所藏, "大隈文書 A165·A166·A219·A4424·A4425·A4429·A4430", ~
  17. 大隈文書 一, "早稲田大學社會科學硏究所", 早稻田大學社會科學硏究所., ~ (1958)
  18. 家近良樹, "『台灣出兵』 方針の轉換と長州派の反對運動", 史學雜誌, pp.92~11 (1983)
  19. 高橋秀直, "日淸戰爭への道" (1995), 東京創元社
  20. 勝田政治, "大久保利通と台灣出兵", 國士舘大學文學部 人文學會紀要, 34 (2001)
  21. 毛利敏彦, "台灣出兵" (1996), 中公新書
  22. 石井孝, "明治初期の日本と東アジア" (1982), 有隣堂
  23. 小林隆夫, "台灣事件と琉球處分(Ⅰ)", 政治經濟史學, 340 (1994)
  24. 小風秀雅, "華夷秩序と日本外交 in 明治維新とアジア" (2001), 吉川弘文館
  25. 信夫淸三郞, "日本政治史Ⅱ 明治維新" (1978), 南窓社
  26. 安岡昭男, "明治前期大陸政策史の硏究" (1998), 法政大學出版局
  27. 永井秀夫, "統一國家の成立 , 岩波講座 日本歷史14 近代1" (1975), 岩波書店
  28. 栗原純, "台灣事件(1871~1874年)", 史學雜誌, pp.87~9 (1978)
  29. 張虎, "副島對淸外交の檢討 in 明治維新とアジア" (2001), 吉川弘文館
  30. 中塚明, "日淸戰爭の硏究" (1968), 靑木書店
  31. 太塚孝明, "明治初期外交指導者の對外認識-副島種臣と寺島宗則を中心に", 國際政治, 102 (1993)
  32. 後藤新, "台灣出兵と琉球處分", 法學政治學論究, 72 (2007)
  33. Eskildsen, Robert Alan, "明治七年台灣出兵の植民地的側面 in 明治維新とアジア" (2001), 吉川弘文館

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)