본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상담성과 측정을 위한 상담성과척도(Outcome Questionnaire-30: OQ-30)의 타당화

A Validity Study on Outcome Questionnaire-30 (OQ-30) with Korean Clients

0

조회

0

다운로드

21

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

대학생 및 만19세 이상 성인 내담자의 상담성과를 측정하기 위해 Vermeersch, Lambert, 그리고 Burlingame(2000)이 개발한 Outcome Questionnaire-30(OQ-30)을 번안하고, 남녀 성인 내담자 342명에게 1회기 전에 OQ-30설문지를 실시하여 내적합치도와 구인타당도를 검증하였다. 그리고 대학생 및 성인 33명을 대상으로 3주 간격 검사-재검사 신뢰도를, 교수와 상담전문가 4인에게 각 문항과 요인에 대한 문화적 타당도를 살펴보았다. 그 결과, 한글판 OQ-30은 영어판과 동등한 3 요인구조가 지지되었으며, 내적 합치도와 3주 간격 검사-재검사 신뢰도에서 높은 일관성을 나타내었으며, 우리나라 문화에서도 대체로 적절한 문항과 요인인 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

The present study was conducted to validate Outcome Questionnaire-30 developed by Vermeersch, Lambert, & Burlingame(2000) with Korean clients from natural counseling settings. The OQ-30 was developed to evaluate counseling outcome from client's perspective and one of the widely used in western countries. We followed translation and back-translation process and 342 Korean clients participated in the study. The participants responded to the OQ-30 prior to the first counseling session and their responses were analyzed for construct validity using the Structural Equation Model. For the reliability, internal consistency and test-retest reliability were checked with 33 college student and community sample. Also, cultural validity of items and subscales were examined by 4 counseling psychologists and counseling psychology professors. Results showed the same three factor structures as shown in western culture. Also, the results of test-retest reliability and internal consistency showed that the OQ-30 is reliable with Korean sample.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김계현, "상담심리학연구" (2000), 학지사
  2. 김정미, "여성임파워먼트 증진을 위한 인지행동 집단상담과 게슈탈트 집단상담 비교", 상담학연구, 6(3), pp.821~835 (2005), 한국상담학회
  3. 김창대, "한국 상담성과와 상담자 효과", 한국 상담학회 연차대회 하계 학술대회 자료집 (2010)
  4. 이무상, "현실요법을 적용한 중학생의 리더십생활기술 증진학급단위 집단상담 프로그램 개발", 상담학연구, 9(2), pp.771~788 (2008), 한국상담학회
  5. 임은미, "학급단위 계열탐색 진로상담 프로그램 참가자들의 회기평가와 진학결정성 변화", 상담학연구, 10(1), pp.437~453 (2009), 한국상담학회
  6. 정남운, "상담과정에서의 대인관계적 상보성과 상담성과", 박사, pp.1998
  7. 홍세희, "구조방정식모형의 기초와 응용", 한국임상심리학회 워크샵자료집 (2001)
  8. Brislin, R. W., "Cross-cultural research methods" (1973), John Wiley
  9. Brown, G. S., "Pushing the quality envelope: A new outcomes management system", Psychiatric Services, 53, pp.925~934 (2001)
  10. Brown, G. S., "Implementation of a feedback system in a managed care environment: What are patients teaching us?", Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, pp.187~198 (2005)
  11. "The Research Consortium of Counseling and Psychological Services in Higher Education" (2004)[URL]
  12. Curran, P. J., "The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis", Psychological Methods, 1, pp.16~29 (1996)
  13. Durham, C. J., "The effects of repeated administrations on self report and parent report scales", Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, pp.240~257 (2002)
  14. Eisen, S. V., "Implementing outcome systems : Lessons from a test of the BASIS-32 and the SF-36", The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 26, pp.18~27 (1999)
  15. Ellsworth, J. R., "A comparison of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 and Outcome Questionnaire-30 in classification and prediction of treatment outcome", Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, pp.380~391 (2006)
  16. Evans, C., "Towards a standardised brief outcome measure : Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM", The British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, pp.51~60 (2002)
  17. Farnsworth, J., "A review of outcome measurement practices in the Journal of Cousulting and Clinical Psychology", Doniesienie wygloszone na Konferencji Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Reno, NV, 2001. Wykladw posiadaniu autora, ~ (2001)
  18. Finch, A. E., "Psychotherapy quality control : The statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning system", Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 8, pp.231~242 (2001)
  19. Froyd, J. E., "A review of practices of psychotherapy outcome measurement", Journal of Mental Health, 5, pp.11~15 (1996)
  20. Guyatt, G., "Measuring health status in chronic airflow limitation", European Respiratory Journal, 1, pp.560~564 (1988)
  21. Hambleton, R. K., "Cuidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests : A progress report", European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, pp.229~244 (1994)
  22. Hatfield, D. R., "The use of outcome measures by psychologists in clinical practice", Professional Psychology : Research and Practice, 36, pp.485~491 (2004)
  23. Hu, L. T., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling, 6, pp.1~55 (1999)
  24. Jacobson, N. S., "Clinical significance : A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, pp.12~19 (1991)
  25. Jones, M. D., "Construct validity and construct stability of the outcome questionnaire-30: A longitudinal factor analysis", pp.2004
  26. Kim, S. H., "Investigating factor structure of scores on the Outcome Questionnaire using factor mixture modeling", 박사, pp.2009
  27. Lambert, M., "Presidential address : What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care", Psychotherapy Research, 17, pp.1~14 (2007)
  28. Lambert, M. J., "The reliablility and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire", Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3, pp.249~258 (1996)
  29. Lambert, M. J., "The Outcome Questionnaire, In The use of psychological tests for treatment planing and outcome assessment", pp.3~191 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum
  30. Lambert, M. J., "Administration and Scoring Manual for the LSQ" (2001), American Professional Credentialing Services
  31. Lambert, M. J., "Measuring outcome in professional practice : Considerations in selecting and using brief outcome instruments", Professional Psychology : Research and Practice, 35, pp.492~499 (2004)
  32. Lambert, M. J., "Administration and scoring manual for the Life Status Questionnaire (LSQ-30.2)" (2004), American Professional Credentialing Service
  33. Leibert, T. W., "Making change visible: The Possibilities in assessing mental health counseling outcomes", Journal of counselling & Development, 84, pp.108~113 (2006)
  34. Matumoto, K., "Using clinical informatics to improve outcomes : A new approach to managing behavioral healthcare", Journal of Information Technology in Health Care, 1, pp.135~150 (2003)
  35. Phelps, R., "Psychological practice and managed care : Results of the CAPP practitioner survey", Professional Psychology : Research and Practice, 29, pp.31~36 (1998)
  36. Vermeersch, D. A., "Outcome Questionnaire : Item sensitivity to change", Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, pp.242~261 (2000)
  37. Vermeersch, D. A., "Outcome Measure: Is it sensitive to changes in counseling center clients?", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, pp.38~49 (2004)
  38. Ægisdóttir, S., "Methodological issues in cross-cultural counseling research: Equivalence, Bias, and Translations", The Counseling Psychologist, 36, pp.188~219 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)