시험 · 검사방법의 유효성 검증 방법 비교
Comparison of Method Validation for Test and Inspections
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One of the most important purposes of a validation method is to verify whether a test method is suitable for the purpose of the test. In this study, validation parameters that are used by national and international institutes for test and inspection bodies are classified. As a result of classifying these general factors, method validation parameters were performed, including the following cases: ① the confirmation of a new test method, ② comparison between a non-standardized test method and standardized method, ③confirmation of a test method needing such extensions as a test method verification, verification of the test method applied between other test institutes or analysts, ④ verification of the required similarity between test methods, and ⑤ revalidation of the previously verified test methods. The general parameters applied in the validation processes were classified as follows; specificity, selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, detection limit uncertainty, quantitative limit, and range. By a comparison of the validation guidelines or guideline parameters applied by the test and inspection bodies, the survey results were considered to be useful in preparing validation guidelines for environmental testing and inspection methods.
Abstract
One of the most important purposes of a validation method is to verify whether a test method is suitable for the purpose of the test. In this study, validation parameters that are used by national and international institutes for test and inspection bodies are classified. As a result of classifying these general factors, method validation parameters were performed, including the following cases: ① the confirmation of a new test method, ② comparison between a non-standardized test method and standardized method, ③confirmation of a test method needing such extensions as a test method verification, verification of the test method applied between other test institutes or analysts, ④ verification of the required similarity between test methods, and ⑤ revalidation of the previously verified test methods. The general parameters applied in the validation processes were classified as follows; specificity, selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, detection limit uncertainty, quantitative limit, and range. By a comparison of the validation guidelines or guideline parameters applied by the test and inspection bodies, the survey results were considered to be useful in preparing validation guidelines for environmental testing and inspection methods.
참고문헌 (7)
- ISO, "17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories", ~
- KOLAS, "화학적 시험방법의 유효성 확인을 위한 지침" (2012)
- 품의약품안전청, "의약품등 시험방법 검증 가이드 라인 적용을 위한 해설서", ~ (2012)
- EPA, "Guidance on Environmental Data Verification and Data Validation" (2002)
- NATA, "Guidelines for the validation and verification of quantitative and qualitative test methods" (2013)
- "UK standards for microbiology investigations, issued by the standards unit, Microbiology Services", PHE, ~ (2011)
- Eurachem, "the Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods - A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics" (2014)
