본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

시료 채취방식의 차이에 따른 방향족 VOC 시료의 분석특성에 대한 연구 - 흡착관 대비 백 채취방식의 비교 -

The Relationship between Different Sampling Approaches on the Analysis of Aromatic VOC in Air: the Tube vs. Bag Method

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Quality Assurance (QA) is an important prerequisite to the enhancement of the analytical data produced by different operators or by different instrumentation. Especially, the selection of a sampling technique is crucial to ensure the subjectiveness of the analysis. In this study, the analytical technique for four volatile organic compounds (VOC) including: benzene, toluene, p-xylene, and styrene was investigated by evaluating the relationship between two different analytical sampling methods (i.e, adsorption tube vs Tedlar bag method). For this purpose, the same working standard of VOC was prepared and collected simultaneously by the Tedlar bag and the tube method. The reliability of each sampling method was then assessed by analytical results derived each approach. The reproducibility of analytical method, estimated in terms of (relative standard error (RSE %)), showed that both methods can maintain below values 5% level. The results of this study indicate that both sampling approaches are highly comparable to each other. The results of this study suggest that both tube method and Tedlar bag method are compiling well.

Abstract

Quality Assurance (QA) is an important prerequisite to the enhancement of the analytical data produced by different operators or by different instrumentation. Especially, the selection of a sampling technique is crucial to ensure the subjectiveness of the analysis. In this study, the analytical technique for four volatile organic compounds (VOC) including: benzene, toluene, p-xylene, and styrene was investigated by evaluating the relationship between two different analytical sampling methods (i.e, adsorption tube vs Tedlar bag method). For this purpose, the same working standard of VOC was prepared and collected simultaneously by the Tedlar bag and the tube method. The reliability of each sampling method was then assessed by analytical results derived each approach. The reproducibility of analytical method, estimated in terms of (relative standard error (RSE %)), showed that both methods can maintain below values 5% level. The results of this study indicate that both sampling approaches are highly comparable to each other. The results of this study suggest that both tube method and Tedlar bag method are compiling well.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. S. Unnikrishnan, , Evironment international, 32, pp.87~94 (2006)
  2. K.L. Yang, , Atmospheric environment, 39, pp.2829~2838 (2005)
  3. F. Gan, , Analytica chimica acta, 490, pp.153~158 (2003)
  4. 이민도, "대기 중 휘발성유기화합물질 및 알데하이드의 분석 신뢰도 향상에 관한 고찰", 한국대기환경학회지, 22(4), pp.468~476 (2006), 한국대기환경학회
  5. G.S. Heo, , Journal of microchemical, 70, pp.275~283 (2001)
  6. U. Vogt, , Corsmeier Atmospheric environment, 3, pp.5642~5664 (2005)
  7. B. Tolnai, "Combination of canister and solid adsorbent sampling techiques for volatile organic hydrocarbons", Journal of microchemical, 67, pp.163~169 (2000)
  8. 전준민, "Canister와 GC", MSD를 이용한 대기 중 VOCs 분석시스템의 정도관리(QC), 2002, pp.18(6), 527~538[DOI]
  9. E.E. Stashenko, , Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods, 70, pp.235~242 (2007)
  10. S. Beghi, , Journal of chromatography A, 1127, pp.1~5 (2006)
  11. K.H. Kim, , Journal of Separation science, 30(3), pp.367~374 (2007)
  12. 김기현, "휘발성유기화합물의 작업용 표준시료의 분석과 오차의 발생에 대한 특성: 희석과정이 분석결과에 미치는 영향", 실내환경 및 냄새 학회지, 5(2), pp.99~107 (2006), 한국냄새환경학회
  13. 전선주, , 한국대기환경학회지, 15(4), pp.417~428 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)