본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

측정 항목별 분석 소요시간과 연계한 자가 측정 대행 제도 개선 연구

A Study on the Improvement of Self-measurement Agency System Related with Time Required for Analysis by Measurement Items

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The problem with the current self-measurement agency system is that as in 2007, the self-measurement agency fee was abolished and was improved to be operated according to the market economy principle, it is in the state that in the case of the price competition for the measurement agency, the measurement fees are priced at the lower prices, to set the unit price by applying the lowermost bidding system. With the lower measurement fee, in order to make the measurement fee collected, the cases non-complying with the regulations, such as the arbitrary result report and so on, are currently occurring, and it is difficult to guarantee the reliability for the measurement results because it is a limiting factor in recruiting the technical manpower with the certificates. In this study, the environmental pollutants were divided into the areas of atmosphere (28 items), water quality (80 items), and indoor air quality (10 items), and then, the time required for the sampling, preprocessing, analysis, writing reports, etc. was estimated. The sampling time was Min. 12.3 minutes – Max. 170 minutes in atmosphere, Min. 26.9 minutes – Max. 45 minutes in water quality, and Min. 52.9 minutes – Max. 96.720 minutes in indoor air quality. As a result of calculating the daily workload per 1 group (2 people) for the technical manpower in the atmospheric field based on these findings, it appeared that the Min. 3 units – Max. 5 units of measurement vent (or companies) could be collected. It is expected that when the limitations of the workload quantity derived like above might be used as a factor in the rating method by each measuring agent, it could be a starting point to fix the chronic problem of the current measurement agency system.

Abstract

The problem with the current self-measurement agency system is that as in 2007, the self-measurement agency fee was abolished and was improved to be operated according to the market economy principle, it is in the state that in the case of the price competition for the measurement agency, the measurement fees are priced at the lower prices, to set the unit price by applying the lowermost bidding system. With the lower measurement fee, in order to make the measurement fee collected, the cases non-complying with the regulations, such as the arbitrary result report and so on, are currently occurring, and it is difficult to guarantee the reliability for the measurement results because it is a limiting factor in recruiting the technical manpower with the certificates. In this study, the environmental pollutants were divided into the areas of atmosphere (28 items), water quality (80 items), and indoor air quality (10 items), and then, the time required for the sampling, preprocessing, analysis, writing reports, etc. was estimated. The sampling time was Min. 12.3 minutes – Max. 170 minutes in atmosphere, Min. 26.9 minutes – Max. 45 minutes in water quality, and Min. 52.9 minutes – Max. 96.720 minutes in indoor air quality. As a result of calculating the daily workload per 1 group (2 people) for the technical manpower in the atmospheric field based on these findings, it appeared that the Min. 3 units – Max. 5 units of measurement vent (or companies) could be collected. It is expected that when the limitations of the workload quantity derived like above might be used as a factor in the rating method by each measuring agent, it could be a starting point to fix the chronic problem of the current measurement agency system.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 환경부, "환경백서", pp.317~ (1996)
  2. 양주시, "2006 양주시 환경백서", pp.119~ (2006)
  3. 환경부, "환경분야 시험·검시 등에 관한 법률", 법률 제13601호, 타법개정, 제16조, ~ (2015)
  4. 환경부, "환경백서", pp.182~ (1997)
  5. 환경부, "환경백서", pp.139~211 (2014)
  6. 환경부, "환경백서", pp.316~ (2016)
  7. 환경오염물질 배출시설 지도·점검방법 개선 방안 연구, "환경부", 55~56 (2005)
  8. "(사)한국산업경제연구소", 5~801 (2015)
  9. "(사)한국산업경제연구소", 437~521 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

환경시험 · 검사기관의 정도관리 현장평가 미흡사항 분석(I)- 대기, 수질, 먹는물 분야를 중심으로 -고상호, 김지혜, 김태연, 박창희, 오상민, 이종천, 이현국, 이혜리, 전수아, 최자윤, 허유정, 황종연한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2024 · 제27권 제4호환경분야 시험 · 검사기관의 정도관리 현장평가결과 고찰고상호, 김명진, 김지혜, 박현우, 이경로, 이수영, 이진주, 이혜리, 전수아, 정현미, 최성헌, 최종우, 허유정, 홍석영, 황종연한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2019 · 제22권 제4호환경분야 시험 · 검사기관 현장평가 결과 분석고상호, 김지혜, 박창희, 이경로, 이진주, 이혜리, 전수아, 정현미, 최종우, 황종연한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2020 · 제23권 제2호시험 · 검사기관 현장평가 미흡사항 분석(II)- 폐기물, 토양, 실내공기질 분야의 미흡사항을 중심으로 -고상호, 김태연, 박창희, 이종천, 이혜리, 최자윤, 허유정, 황종연한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2025 · 제28권 제2호환경분야 시험 · 검사방법의 유효성 검증 기법 연구고상호, 김금희, 김명옥, 김명진, 김지혜, 유은진, 윤숙희, 이신우, 이진주, 임보라, 정현미, 최종우, 허유정, 홍석영, 황종연한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2018 · 제21권 제2호수질연속자동측정기의 상대정확도 적합성 및 유효성 연구김상윤, 김승열, 최종우, 추용엽한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2013 · 제16권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)