본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수질 중 중금속(Cr, Ba) 숙련도 시험 평가

Proficiency Testing of Heavy Metals (Cr, Ba) in Water

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this study, the analytical techniques of 51 domestic and international institutions were assessed based on the proficiency testing of heavy metals. The proficiency testing samples that were prepared and distributed for this study were barium and chromium, of which their homogeneity and stability in water were ensured. Thirtyeight institutions and 45 institutions participated and submitted their results obtained from the analysis of barium and chromium, respectively. A statistical assessment on the proficiency test was conducted on the basis of the z-score and the results obtained are as follows: for barium, 1 institution was assessed as unsatisfactory and 6 as doubtful, and for chromium, 6 were assessed as unsatisfactory and 4 as doubtful. The testing institutions that had doubtful or unsatisfactory results need to consider the cause of causal analysis inaccuracies, including reference materials, glassware, inspection of the testing equipment and recalibration, test procedure reviews, tester training, and continuous participation in proficiency tests of relevant areas in order to promote efforts for improving and taking preventive measures for performance improvement.

Abstract

In this study, the analytical techniques of 51 domestic and international institutions were assessed based on the proficiency testing of heavy metals. The proficiency testing samples that were prepared and distributed for this study were barium and chromium, of which their homogeneity and stability in water were ensured. Thirtyeight institutions and 45 institutions participated and submitted their results obtained from the analysis of barium and chromium, respectively. A statistical assessment on the proficiency test was conducted on the basis of the z-score and the results obtained are as follows: for barium, 1 institution was assessed as unsatisfactory and 6 as doubtful, and for chromium, 6 were assessed as unsatisfactory and 4 as doubtful. The testing institutions that had doubtful or unsatisfactory results need to consider the cause of causal analysis inaccuracies, including reference materials, glassware, inspection of the testing equipment and recalibration, test procedure reviews, tester training, and continuous participation in proficiency tests of relevant areas in order to promote efforts for improving and taking preventive measures for performance improvement.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "ILAC" (2017)[URL]
  2. "ISO", IEC 17025, General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration in laboratories, 2005
  3. "ISO 9001, Quality management system - requirements", ~ (2015)
  4. "ISO", IEC 17043, Conformity assessment-General requirements for proficiency testing, 2010
  5. 국립전파연구원, "비교숙련도 품질시스템 개발에 관한 연구", 15~16 (2016)
  6. "KS I ISO 11885, 수질-유도결합플라즈마 원자발광분석법(ICP-OES)에 의한 선택원소 측정 방법", ~ (2008)
  7. Eugene W. Rice, "Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater -3120, 22nd edition", ~ (2012)
  8. "수질오염공정시험기준", ~ (2015)
  9. "KS Q ISO Guide 30, 표준물질 관련 용어 및 정의", ~ (2005)
  10. "ISO 13528, Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing in the laboratory comparisons", ~ (2015)
  11. "ISO Guide 35, Reference materials - General and statistical principles for certification", ~ (2006)
  12. 이정엽, "수질 중 유기인계 농약류, Diazinon과Parathion의 숙련도 시험용 시료 개발", 환경분석과 독성보건, 20(2), pp.81~86 (2017), 한국환경분석학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)