二重代表訴訟의 許否에 대한 比較法的 檢討- 서울고등법원 2003.8.22. 선고, 2002다13746 판결을 대상으로 하여 -
A Comparative Review of Whether a Double DerivativeSuit is Recognized under the Current Laws of Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
41
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The Korean Commercial Code has the provision that a shareholder with at least one percent of the total outstanding shares may bring a derivative suit. This provision was designed to apply to single derivative suit. However, in August 2003, the Seoul High Court decided that a double derivative suit is permitted under the current Commercial Code. The purpose of this Article is to critically review the Court's decision. The findings are as follows: First, the court enumerated the views against the double derivative suit. One of the views is that this kind of suit is in violation of the contemporary ownership rule, under which the plaintiff must have held shares at the time of the act complained of by him in order to bring suit. However, the rule is not applicable to shareholders under the Korean Commercial Code. Second, there has been a rule that before a shareholder may proceed with a double derivative suit, adequate demand must be made of the directors of both parent and subsidiary corporations to bring suit on behalf of the subsidiary corporation, unless such demand would be futile. The Seoul Hight Court payed little attention to the importance of the demand requirement. Finally, the Seoul High Court opined that the double derivative suit is regarded as a method of recovering shareholders's loss and of deterring wrongdoings by corporate insiders. However, this kind of rationale is not enough to justify the double derivative suit under the current Commercial Code.
참고문헌 (44)
- "株主代表訴訟에 관한 硏究" (1995), 광주대학교
- "支配ㆍ從屬關係에 있는 會社의 株主代表訴訟-美國會社法을 중심으로-", (7) (1997), 光州大學校
- "소수주주권의 법리", 22(2) (2003), 韓國商事法學會
- "支配ㆍ從屬會社에서의 代表訴訟", 19(2) (2000), 韓國商事法學會
- "株式의 包括的 交換 및 移轉과 代表訴訟", (46) (2002), 韓國上場會社協議會
- "주주의 대표소송과 중복대표소송", 10 (2000), 韓國經營法律學會
- "株主代表訴訟의 利用範圍 擴大", 13 (2002), 한국외국어대학교
- "多重代表訴訟에 대한 考察" (2002), 乃東禹洪九博士停年退任紀念論文集 刊行委員會
- "持株會社의 導入에 따른 會社法의 向方-支配(control)와 責任을 중심으로", 18(1) (1999), 韓國商事法學會
- "이중대표소송의 인정근거", 15 (2003), 韓國商事判例學會
- "증권관련집단소송제도에 관한 법경제학적 연구" (2003), 崇實大學校 大學院
- "代表訴訟「 會社法上의 諸問題」", 38 (1987), 法院圖書館
- "미국 회사법상의 二重代表訴訟(Double Derivative Suit)에 관한 硏究" (2003), 서울大學校 大學院
- "持株會社, 三訂版" (2001), 세창출판사
- "會社法講義 第11版" (2004), 博英社
- "미국 회사법상의 二重代表訴訟", 2 (1997), 水原地方法院
- "株主의 代表訴訟-實務上의 問題點을 中心으로 하여-", 2 (1972), 法院行政處
- "會社法 第七版" (2001), 法文社
- "商法講義(上) 第7版" (2004), 博英社
- "美國會社法上 株主의 重複代表訴訟에 관한 硏究", 46 (1998), 건국대학교 대학원
- "Model Business Corporation Act Annotated" (1985), American Bar Association
- "Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations" (1994), American Law Institute
- "The Law of Corporate Groups Procedural Problems in the Law of Patent and Subsidiary Corporations" (1983)
- "The Rule That Isn't a Rule-The Business Judgment Rule", 631 (2002)
- "Law of Corporate Officers and Directors:Rights" (1993)
- "Corporate Law" (1986)
- "Demand in Derivative Actions: Problems of Interpretation and Function, 19 University of Califonia", 461 (1986)
- "Mergers and Double Derivative Actions:The New Frontier in Derivative Standing", 38 (1993)
- "The Dilemma of the Double Derivative Suit", 83 (1989)
- "Note, Suits by a Shareholder in a Parent Corporation to Redress Injuries to the Subsidiary", 64 (1951)
- "Demand on Directors and Shareholders As a Prerequisite to a Derivative Suit", 73 (1960)
- "Understanding Securities Law" (2001)
- "Trust Beneficiary Standing in Shareholder Derivative Actions", 39 (1986)
- "株式會社法の理論 2" (1995), 中央經濟社
- "株主代表訴訟の現狀と問題點", (142) (1998), 民事法情報センタ-
- "株主代表訴訟の法理-生成と展開-" (2000), 信山社
- "結合企業と代表訴訟(1)", 45(2) (2002), 高崎經濟大學
- 三浦州夫, "株主代表訴訟における原告の株主資格の喪失と訴訟承繼について" (2002), 商事法務
- "株式交換ㆍ移轉制度の逐條解說" (2000), 中央經濟社
- 田邊光政, "株式移轉により完全親會社の株主となった者と子會社取締役に對する代表訴訟の原告適格" (2003), 法律文化社
- 畠田公明, "純粹持株會社と株主代表訴訟", (1140) (1998), 有斐閣
- 志谷匡史, "親子會社と取締役の責任" (1996), 弘文堂
- 通商産業省 産業政策局産業資金課, "株主代表訴訟の現狀と課題", 173 (1995), 商事法務硏究會
- "アメリカにおける中層代表訴訟の展開" (1996), 成文堂