본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

집행임원제에 대한 연구

A Study on the Executive Officer System in Corporate Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In recent years the corporate lawyers in Korea have discussed enthusiastically the issue on the introduction of the american executive officer system in their Commercial Code Book. But until now they don't have any clear result on that. The american officer system has developed in the wave of the improving the failed corporate board. Nowadays we cannot see any serious 'management' in terms of the operating daily businesses at a corporate board. Instead of this the corporate boards oversee the managements and they give indirect advice to them. So the senior executives are operating the daily business in almost every public corporation in U.S. From a perspective of the internal control, the separation between the management and the board is very important. A good governance requests probably also it. But at the same time we should bear in mind that the efficiency of the business has the same weight in a good corporate governance. Dimma says, "corporate governance is a process, not a result. It is and must always be a means, never an end. The end is improved corporate performance and return to investors."(Dimma, Exellence in the Boardroom, p. 73). And the reality in a daily corporate life in U.S. shows that the CEO and the chairman of the board are usually combined to one person. So the individual company should decide the combination or the separation of both ; it belongs principally to a freedom of every corporation to choose the governance structure.

Abstract

In recent years the corporate lawyers in Korea have discussed enthusiastically the issue on the introduction of the american executive officer system in their Commercial Code Book. But until now they don't have any clear result on that. The american officer system has developed in the wave of the improving the failed corporate board. Nowadays we cannot see any serious 'management' in terms of the operating daily businesses at a corporate board. Instead of this the corporate boards oversee the managements and they give indirect advice to them. So the senior executives are operating the daily business in almost every public corporation in U.S. From a perspective of the internal control, the separation between the management and the board is very important. A good governance requests probably also it. But at the same time we should bear in mind that the efficiency of the business has the same weight in a good corporate governance. Dimma says, "corporate governance is a process, not a result. It is and must always be a means, never an end. The end is improved corporate performance and return to investors."(Dimma, Exellence in the Boardroom, p. 73). And the reality in a daily corporate life in U.S. shows that the CEO and the chairman of the board are usually combined to one person. So the individual company should decide the combination or the separation of both ; it belongs principally to a freedom of every corporation to choose the governance structure.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 강희갑, "미국법상 집행임원제도의 도입에 관한 연구 - 주식회사의 지배구조의 개선과 관련하여", 비교사법, 7(2)통권 : 13
  2. 강희갑, "집행임원제도의 도입과 기업환경", 상사법연구, 25(4) (2007)
  3. 김봉수, "대표이사(CEO)와 회장(Chairman)의 권한분배에 대한 북미의 추세에 대한 소고, 상법연구의 향기", 정희철교수정년 20년기념논문집 (2004), 仁山紀念論集編纂委員會
  4. 김화진, "이사회" (2005), 박영사
  5. 양동석, "임원제도도입에 따른 법적 문제", 상사법연구, 20(2) (2001)
  6. 양동석, "집행임원의 역할과 법적 지위, 상장협, 제48호 (2003년 추계호)", ~ (2003)
  7. 양만식, "집행인원제도의 도입에 따른 지배구조론의 전개", 상사법연구, 24(1) (2005)
  8. 원동욱, "주식회사 이사회의 기능변화에 따른 집행임원제도의 도입에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  9. 임중호, "국회법사위 “상법일부 개정법률안 검토보고”, 2007년 11월", ~ (2007)
  10. "전국경제인연합회, 집행임원제도 도입의 문제점, CEO REPORT, CER 2006-15, 2006년 8월", ~ (2006)
  11. 전우현, "주식회사 감사위원회 제도의 개선에 관한 일고찰, -집행임원제 필요성에 대한 검토의 부가", 상사법연구, 23(3) (2004)
  12. 전우현, "상법상 주식회사의 집행임원제 도입에 관한 연구 - 특히 실증적 조사에 관한 검토의견의 부가 -", 상사법 3개학회 하계공동학술대회 발표문 (2008)
  13. 정찬형, "주식회사 지배구조관련 개정의견", 상사법연구, 24(2) (2005)
  14. 정찬형, "한국주식회사에서의 집행임원에 대한 연구", 고려법학, (43) (2004)
  15. 정찬형, "2007년 확정한 정부의 상법(회사법)개정안에 대한 의견", 고려법학, (50) (2007)
  16. 조명현, "기업지배구조의 핵심으로서의 작동할 수 있는 이사회의 설계, 지배구조개선지원센터 정책연구 최종 연구보고서, 2004년 8월", ~ (2004)
  17. 최준선, "한국 회사법의 개정방향", 상장협연구, (54) (2006)
  18. 허? 인, "집행임원제도의 도입방안에 관한 법적 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  19. 丹羽哲夫, "執行役員制, 日本能率協會 刊, 2006年(4刷)", ~ (2006)
  20. 近藤光男, "執行役", 民商法雜誌, (4,5) (2002)
  21. Agrawal, Anup, "Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems Between Managers and Shareholders", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 377 (1996)
  22. "American Law Insititute, Principles of Corporate Governance : Analysis and Recommendations, Vol. I, Parts I-VI, ㎣ 1.01 to 6.02, American Law Institute Publishers, St. Paul, Minn., (1994)", ~ (1994)
  23. Bhagat, Sanjai, "The Non-Correaltion between Board Independence?and Long-Term Firm Performance", Journal of Corporations Law, 231 (2002)
  24. Chamu Sunelaramurthy, "Board Structure, Anti-Takeover Provisions and Stockholder Wealth", Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1996)
  25. "Delaware Corporation Laws Annotated, 2007~2008 Edition, Lexisnexis, Dover, Delaware, 2007", ~ (2007)
  26. Dimma, William A., "Excellence in the Boardroom in: Best Practices in Corporate Directorship" (2002), Wiley
  27. Dorval, "Governance of Publicly Listed Corporations" (2005), LexisNexis, Butter- worths
  28. Eisenberg, Melvin A., "The Structure of the Corporation, A Legal Analysis, Little" (1976), Brown and Company
  29. "Fletcher Cyc. Corp., Fletcher Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Cor- porations, William Meade Fletcher, 1998 Revised Volume, Volume 2, West Group, 1998", ~ (1998)
  30. Gordon, J. N., ""What Enron Means for Management and Control of the Modern Business Corporation, Some Initial Reflections", Columbia Law School Working Paper, No. 203 (Summer 2002), online at : <http:", center_program, pp.law_ economics, wp_
  31. Hundley, Rebecca, ""Separating the Board Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer ; Pro and Con", Term Paper, October 22, 1999 ; online at <http:", db, pp.11, bmu64.shtml>
  32. Hurther, Jeff, "An Empirical Test of the Effect of Board Size on Firm Efficiency", Economic Letters, 54(3), pp.259~264 (1996)
  33. Larsen, Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation in the 21st Century, "The Corporate Governance Conundrum : Re-inventing the Board of Directors and Board Committees, in : Puri", pp.2004, Kaura, Belle
  34. Kim, Kenneth A., "Corporate Governance" (2007), Pearson-Prentice Hall
  35. Klein, April, "Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure", Journal of Law & Economics, 41 (1998)
  36. Leblanc, Richard, "Inside the Boardroom" (2005), Wiley
  37. Lechem, Brian, "hairman of the Board, A Practical Guide" (2002), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  38. "Model Business Corporation Act Annotated, 3rd ed., 2000", 01, pp.2002, ~
  39. Puri, Poonam, "Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation in the 21st Century" (2004), Butterworths
  40. Ward, Ralph D, "Saving the Corporate Board, Why Boards Fail and How to Fix Them", pp.2003
  41. Yermack, David, "Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors", Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2) (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)