본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대소회사구분입법론* -주주 간의 분쟁해결을 위한 구분입법을 중심으로-

The Separate Legislation between Large and Small Corporation -Centering the method to settle disputes between shareholders-

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The stock corporation which is the typical form of capital company can raise enormous funds from the general public and easily collect the capital invested by the freedom of stock transfer. In stock corporation, shareholders assume the limited liability and ownership and manage- ment are separated. Therefore the stock corporation fits to corporation which is large scale and which has a number of shareholders. But, contrary to the ideals of law, small and medium-sized corporations in capital scale or number of shareholders take the from of stock corporation. In Korea nearly 90% of total business associations take the form of stock corporation and more than 90% of stock corporations are small and medium-sized stock corporations. This stock corporation system is the system on the assumption of large scale public corporation. Therefore the gap between law and reality becomes greater. Especially close corporations may be afflicted by internal dissension, stalemate or deadlock. Here I suggest two methods to solve disputes between shareholders in close corporation. Firstly, it is the method to solve disputes through buy-out provision, arbitration(or mediation) provision, dissolution provision or split-up provision in articles of association. Secondly, it is the method to solve disputes through the appraisal right, shareholders` fiduciary duty, dividends right or dissolution in the Commercial Law.

Abstract

The stock corporation which is the typical form of capital company can raise enormous funds from the general public and easily collect the capital invested by the freedom of stock transfer. In stock corporation, shareholders assume the limited liability and ownership and manage- ment are separated. Therefore the stock corporation fits to corporation which is large scale and which has a number of shareholders. But, contrary to the ideals of law, small and medium-sized corporations in capital scale or number of shareholders take the from of stock corporation. In Korea nearly 90% of total business associations take the form of stock corporation and more than 90% of stock corporations are small and medium-sized stock corporations. This stock corporation system is the system on the assumption of large scale public corporation. Therefore the gap between law and reality becomes greater. Especially close corporations may be afflicted by internal dissension, stalemate or deadlock. Here I suggest two methods to solve disputes between shareholders in close corporation. Firstly, it is the method to solve disputes through buy-out provision, arbitration(or mediation) provision, dissolution provision or split-up provision in articles of association. Secondly, it is the method to solve disputes through the appraisal right, shareholders` fiduciary duty, dividends right or dissolution in the Commercial Law.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 양동석, "대소회사구분입법론" (1995), 법문사
  2. 이기수, "회사법" (2008), 박영사
  3. 이철송, "회사법강의" (2008), 박영사
  4. 임재연, "증권거래법" (2000), 박영사
  5. 정동윤, "폐쇄회사의 법리" (1982), 법문사
  6. 정동윤, "회사법" (2001), 법문사
  7. 곽관훈, "벤처기업에 있어서의 株主間 契約", 상사법연구, 22(1), pp.329~357 (2003), 한국상사법학회
  8. 김건식, "21세기 회사법 개정의 논리-2006년 법무부 상법개정작업 기초실무 자료(기업재무편)-" (2007), 小花
  9. 김건식, "미국회사법상 반대주주의 주식매수청구권", 법학, 34(3) (1993)
  10. 김광록, "비상장주식의 평가방법에 관한 판례연구(서울지방법원 2003. 6.13. 선고, 2003고합237)", 비교사법, 11(2), pp.477~512 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
  11. 金聖培, "다수파주주의 억압행위와 소수파주주의 합리적 기대 - 폐쇄회사 주주간 분쟁해결에 관한 미국판례를 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 10, pp.69~93 (2002), 한국기업법학회
  12. 김재형, "폐쇄회사에 있어서의 소수파주주의 보호 -주주의 충실의무를 중심으로-", 기업법연구, 9, pp.213~239 (2002), 한국기업법학회
  13. 혁신주도형 경제로의 전환에 있어서 중소기업의 역할, "김주훈", 한국개발연구원 연구보고서, ~ (2005)
  14. 육태우, "미국법상 폐쇄회사에서의 주주억압의 개념", 상사법연구, 25(3), pp.327~359 (2006), 한국상사법학회
  15. 이강룡, "폐쇄회사의 분쟁과 조정에 관한 연구", 상사법연구, 14(2) (1995)
  16. 정동윤,"회사내의 소수파주주의 보호-squeeze-out을 중심으로, "회사내의 소수파주주의 보호-squeeze-out을 중심으로-", 법학논집 (1991)
  17. 최성근, "중소기업 경영합리화를 위한 회사법의 개정방향", 법제연구, (28), pp.53~71 (2005), 한국법제연구원
  18. 진홍기, "株主들간 契約의 內容과 效力에 관한 硏究 - 英·美를 중심으로 우리나라와 比較法的 觀點에서 -", 상사법연구, 26(4), pp.179~229 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  19. F. Hodge O'Neal, "Close Corporations", ~ (1997)
  20. 大野正道, "中小會社法入門" (2004), 信山社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)