소비자불매운동의 의의 및 법적 허용 한계 검토
A Study on the Legality of Consumer Boycott & Consumer Protection in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Consumer boycotts are successfully initiated due to the Internet, as shown in the internet campaign last summer to boycott companies running advertisement in three conservative newspapers. They are critical of the candlelit vigils against American beef imports. The impact was so massive that the number of large companies' printed in those three papers dropped from 12-15 per issue to 2-4. Public prosecutors indicted campaign leaders for hampering business activities and this case is pending in court. Despite the importance and impact of the consumer boycott, relatively few legal studies have been devoted to the issue of consumer boycotts. This article is intended to provide legal criteria of consumer boycotts. First, it attempts to explore the legal status of consumer protection movement in the context of constitutional guarantee of the consumer protection movement in korea(Article 124). Second, it suggests individual consumer, consumer interest, Boycott action, as three elements to be evaluated as a consumer boycott, a key consumer protection movement. Finally it provides a few standards for the judgment of legality of a consumer boycott, with an example of a boycott against Michael Jackson’s concert in 1996.
Abstract
Consumer boycotts are successfully initiated due to the Internet, as shown in the internet campaign last summer to boycott companies running advertisement in three conservative newspapers. They are critical of the candlelit vigils against American beef imports. The impact was so massive that the number of large companies' printed in those three papers dropped from 12-15 per issue to 2-4. Public prosecutors indicted campaign leaders for hampering business activities and this case is pending in court. Despite the importance and impact of the consumer boycott, relatively few legal studies have been devoted to the issue of consumer boycotts. This article is intended to provide legal criteria of consumer boycotts. First, it attempts to explore the legal status of consumer protection movement in the context of constitutional guarantee of the consumer protection movement in korea(Article 124). Second, it suggests individual consumer, consumer interest, Boycott action, as three elements to be evaluated as a consumer boycott, a key consumer protection movement. Finally it provides a few standards for the judgment of legality of a consumer boycott, with an example of a boycott against Michael Jackson’s concert in 1996.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강경근, "헌법학" (1997), 법문사
- 강창경, "소비자법과 정책" (2003), 시그마프레스
- 고형석, "소비자보호법" (2008), 세창출판사
- 구병삭, "신헌법원론" (1996), 박영사
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2008), 법문사
- 권오승, "소비자보호법" (1994), 법문사
- 김성천, "공정거래법상의 소비자보호목적과 소비자권리", 외법연구, 6, pp.85~ (1999), 한국외국어대학교 법학연구소
- 김영신, "새로 쓰는 소비자법과 정책" (2007), 교문사
- 로버트 메이어, "소비자주의" (1996), 하우
- 박경신, "최근의 소비자운동에 한계로서의 2차 불매금지법리에 관한여(I)", 소비자원 콜로키엄 발제문, ~ (2008)
- 성낙인, "헌법학" (2007), 법문사
- 송보경, "한국소비자운동" (2003), 석탑
- 양건, "헌법과 소비자보호", 공법연구, pp.95~
- 이경춘, "시민단체 불매운동의 한계-마이클 잭슨 내한공연 반대운동과 관련하여", 판례실무연구, 5, pp.383~ (2001)
- 이득연, "소비자불매운동: 현황과 평가", 소비자문제연구, (18), pp.139~ (1996)
- 이성환, "소비자보호법의 개정방향", 공법학연구, 6(1), pp.309~339 (2005), 한국비교공법학회
- 장흥섭, , 소비자보호 및 이해를 위한 현대소비자론, ~ (1998)
- 전성자, "글로벌시대의 컨슈머리즘" (1999), 나남출판
- 鄭克元, "헌법체계상 소비자권리의 보장", 공법연구, 31(3), pp.12~12 (2003), 한국공법학회
- "2001"
- 한명옥, "인터넷 상에서의 불매운동 등이 형사처벌의 되상이 되는가-명예훼손죄, 업무방해죄 등 성립여부", 민주사회를위한변호사모임 토론회 (2008)
- 홍성방, "한국헌법과 경제질서", 고시계, pp.4~ (2003)
- Friedman, M, "Consumer Boycotts in the United States, 1970~1980: Contemporary Events in Historical Perspective", The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 19(1), pp.97~ (1970)
- Friedman,M, "On Promoting a Sustainable Future Through Consumer Activism", Journal of Social Issues, 5(4), pp.200~ (1995)
- Lee Hunter, "Beyond Control: Crisis Strategies and Stakeholder Media in the Danone Boycott of 2001", Corporate Reputation Review, 11(4), pp.335~ (2001)
- Möllers, Zur, "Zulässigkeit des Verbraucherboykotts-Brent Spar und Muruoa" (1996), NJW