미국 반트러스트법상의 재판매가격유지행위 규제에 관한 연구
A Study on the Resale Price Maintenance of Anti-Trust Law in U.S.
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Supreme Court of the United States judged differently from existent situation in the Khan Judgment of 1997 regarding, first, best resale price maintenance. This judgment applied rule of reason instead of per se illegal that had been kept since judgment of thet Dr. Miles event in 1911. Debater by valid means that best resale price maintenance makes upper part corporation lower price of goods by lower part corporation with economy school register basis, was criticizing the application of per se illegal as insisting that do function, the Supreme Court of the United States accommodates this. Also, Dr. Miles had kept for 100 years since 1911 years in the Leegin Judgment in 2007 regarding lowest resale price maintenance. By best resale price maintenance and all lowest resale price maintenance do to apply fundamental of rationality about resale price maintenance abolishing principle of natural violation of law of Dr. Miles judgment, all competitions limited conduct(price limitation conduct and elegy standing limitation conduct) that happen in vertical business relations foretold illegality availability by principle of rationality. On the other hand, current our country exclusive possession regulation law is prohibiting best resale price maintenance in principle but permit in case that it is right reason, and is prohibiting this about lowest resale price maintenance. These regulation way sees that there is problem that all of resale price maintenance recognize process competition inhibition because restrict freedom of other person's price decision and do that remove price competition between other person businessman but corporation surrounding of this does not correspond properly in jumpy environment change. The resale price maintenance may have to see as competitive closely in point that the conduct increases consumer's juniors ultimately. Therefore, I think that we revise existing law and permit resale price maintenance in principle, but in case of limit competition control as unfair transaction is desirable.
Abstract
The Supreme Court of the United States judged differently from existent situation in the Khan Judgment of 1997 regarding, first, best resale price maintenance. This judgment applied rule of reason instead of per se illegal that had been kept since judgment of thet Dr. Miles event in 1911. Debater by valid means that best resale price maintenance makes upper part corporation lower price of goods by lower part corporation with economy school register basis, was criticizing the application of per se illegal as insisting that do function, the Supreme Court of the United States accommodates this. Also, Dr. Miles had kept for 100 years since 1911 years in the Leegin Judgment in 2007 regarding lowest resale price maintenance. By best resale price maintenance and all lowest resale price maintenance do to apply fundamental of rationality about resale price maintenance abolishing principle of natural violation of law of Dr. Miles judgment, all competitions limited conduct(price limitation conduct and elegy standing limitation conduct) that happen in vertical business relations foretold illegality availability by principle of rationality. On the other hand, current our country exclusive possession regulation law is prohibiting best resale price maintenance in principle but permit in case that it is right reason, and is prohibiting this about lowest resale price maintenance. These regulation way sees that there is problem that all of resale price maintenance recognize process competition inhibition because restrict freedom of other person's price decision and do that remove price competition between other person businessman but corporation surrounding of this does not correspond properly in jumpy environment change. The resale price maintenance may have to see as competitive closely in point that the conduct increases consumer's juniors ultimately. Therefore, I think that we revise existing law and permit resale price maintenance in principle, but in case of limit competition control as unfair transaction is desirable.
참고문헌 (31)
- 권오승, "경제법(제7판)" (2009), 법문사
- 정호열, "경제법(제2판)" (2008), 박영사
- 임영철, "공정거래법(개정판)" (2008), 법문사
- 김태진, "현행 공정거래법상의 재판매가격유지행위금지* － Dr. Miles 원칙과 Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. 사건을 통하여 살펴본 현행 재판매가격유지행위금지제도에 대한 재고찰 －", 상사법연구, 27(1), pp.311~354 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 김성묵, "재판매가격 유지행위(RPM)에 관한 미 연방대법원판결 변천", 경쟁저널, (136) (2008)
- 이봉의, "독점규제법상 재판매가격유지행위의 성격과 규제체계에 관한 소고", 서울대학교 법학, 48(4), pp.237~259 (2007), 법학연구소
- 신석훈, "미연방대법원의 재판매가격유지행위 평가기준 변화의 정책적 함의" (2007), 한국경제연구원
- 신석훈, "기업의 본질과 경쟁 -경쟁개념의 법경제학 접근-", 규제연구, 15(2), pp.87~120 (2006), 한국규제학회
- 권재열, "독점규제법상 최고재판매가격유지 행위 규제의 개선방안", 규제연구, 14(2), pp.163~188 (2005), 한국규제학회
- 김두진, "미국 독점금지법상 수직적 거래제한에 대한 규제", 경쟁저널, (105) (2004)
- 원용수, "미국 경쟁법상 수직적 거래제한에 관한 판례의 고찰", 공정경쟁, (78) (2002)
- 이성순, "수직적 거래제한행위와 독점금지법", 법경제연구, (1) (1991), ,
- 김성태, "재판매가격유지행위에 대한 독점금지법적 규제:미국의 판례법을 중심으로", 경희법학, 17(1) (1981)
- 舟田正之, "不公正な取木方法" (2009), 有斐閣
- 根岸哲, "独占禁止法概説（第3版)" (2006), 有斐閣
- 土田和博, "アメリカ反トラスト法における垂直的価格制限規制について", 法径論集, (72) (1994)
- 土田和博, "垂直的価格制限と反トラスト法", 国際化時代の独占禁止法の課題（正田彬教授還暦記念論文集) (1993), 日本評論社
- 松下満雄, "アメリカ独占禁止法" (1982), 東京大学出版会
- Correia, "Resale Price Maintenance - Searching for a Policy", J. LEGIS, 18, pp.187~ (1992)
- Hovenkamp, "Fact, Value, and Theory in Antitrust Adjudication", Duke L. J., 1987, pp.897~ (1987)
- Baxter, "The Viability of Vertical Restraints Doctrine", CALIF. L. REV, 75, pp.933~ (1987)
- Telser,L.G, "Why Should Manufacturers Want Fair Trade?", Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (1986)
- Marvel H. P, "The Welfare Effect of Resale Price Maintenance", Journal of Law & Economics, 28 (1985)
- Comanor, "Vertical Price-Fixing, Vertical Market Restrictions, and the New Antitrust Policy", Harv. L. Rev., 98, pp.983~ (1985)
- Marvel H. P, "The Welfare Effect of Resale Price Maintenance", Journal of Law & Economics v., 28 (1985)
- R.H.Bork, "THE ANTITRUST PARADOX - A POLICY AT WAR WITH ITSELF", 288~298 (1978)
- Comment, "A Functional Rule-of-Reason Analysis for the Law of Resale Price Maintenance and Its Application to Spray-Rite v. Monsanto", WISC. L. REV., 1984 (1984)
- Posner, "The Next Step in the Antitrust Treatment of Restrictde Distribution : Per Se Legality", U. CHI. L. REV, 48, pp.6~ (1981)
- Lawrence A, "Sullivan & Warren S" (2000), An Integrated Handbook
- P. Areeda, "Antitrust Analysis" (1997)
- P. Areeda, "ANTITRUST LAW: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application", ~ (1989)