본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mary Shelley’s Reworking of the Two Stories of the Prometheus Myth in Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This article aims to show how Mary Shelley reworks the Greek and Roman myth of Prometheus through her portrayals of three protagonists in Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, namely Robert Walton, Victor Frankenstein, and Frankenstein’s creature. In investigating her reworking of the ancient myths, the paper primarily looks at her main concern with the theme of transgressive desire which she constructs in various ways, by making an effective interlocking structure narrated by three main characters. Her adaptation of the Prometheus myths involves her perceptions of contemporary age, when they were greatly interested in the possibility of creation of life through the power of science. In addition, it conveys her vision of forthcoming danger and problems of science, which originated from man’s unswerving ambition to be like God. The article explores such layers of significances which underlie her creative adaptations of the two Prometheus myths.

Abstract

This article aims to show how Mary Shelley reworks the Greek and Roman myth of Prometheus through her portrayals of three protagonists in Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, namely Robert Walton, Victor Frankenstein, and Frankenstein’s creature. In investigating her reworking of the ancient myths, the paper primarily looks at her main concern with the theme of transgressive desire which she constructs in various ways, by making an effective interlocking structure narrated by three main characters. Her adaptation of the Prometheus myths involves her perceptions of contemporary age, when they were greatly interested in the possibility of creation of life through the power of science. In addition, it conveys her vision of forthcoming danger and problems of science, which originated from man’s unswerving ambition to be like God. The article explores such layers of significances which underlie her creative adaptations of the two Prometheus myths.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Anon, "Frankenstein", The Belle Assemblee, 17, pp.139~42 (1818)
  2. Baldick, Chris, "Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-century Writing" (1987), Clarendon Press
  3. Beer, John, "Romantic Consciousness: From Blake to Mary Shelley" (2003), Palgrave
  4. Private Self.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley, "“Mary Shelley’s Letters the Public", pp.2003, Bennett, Betty T.
  5. Bennett, Betty T., "Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley: An Introduction" (1998), the Johns Hopkins UP
  6. Butler Marilyn, "“Explanatory Notes.” Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus" (1994), Oxford UP
  7. Cantor, Paul. A., "“Mary Shelley and the Taming of the Byronic Hero: ‘Transformation’ and The Deformed Transformed.” The Other Mary Shelley: Beyond Frankenstein", pp.99~104 (1993), Oxford UP
  8. Clemit, Pamela, "“Frankenstein. Matilda, and the Legacies of Godwin.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley", pp.34~40 (2003), Cambridge UP
  9. Croker, John Wilson, "Frankenstein", The Quarterly Review, 18, pp.379~85 (1818)
  10. Curran, Stuart, "“The Political Prometheus.” Spirits of fire: English Romantic Writers and Contemporary Historical Methods", pp.262~74 (1990), Associated UP
  11. Ellis, Kate Ferguson, "“Subversive Surfaces: the Limits of Domestic Affection in Mary Shelley’s Later Fiction.” The Other Mary Shelley: Beyond Frankenstein", pp.220~28 (1993), Oxford UP
  12. Hoeveler, Diane Long, "“Frankenstein, Feminism, and Literary Theory.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley", pp.45~60 (2003), Cambridge UP
  13. Johnson, Barbara, "“The Last Man.” The Other Mary Shelley: Beyond Frankenstein", pp.205~209 (1993), Oxford UP
  14. Joseph, M. K., "“Introduction.” Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley: Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus", pp.5~8 (1980), Oxford UP
  15. Kucich, Greg, "“Biographer.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley", pp.233~35 (2003), Cambridge UP
  16. Mellor, Anne K, "“Making a monster: an Introduction to Frankenstein.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley", pp.12~25 (2003), Cambridge UP
  17. Mellor, Anne K., "Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters" (1988), Routledge
  18. Pascoe, Judith, "“Proserpine and Midas.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley", pp.180~90 (2003), Cambridge UP
  19. Rauch, Alan, "The Monstrous Body of Knowledge in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein", Studies in Romanticism, 34, pp.227~53 (1995)
  20. Schor, Esther, "“Frankenstein and Film.” The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley", pp.64~70 (2003), Cambridge UP
  21. Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, "“The Shelley’s Reading Lists.” The Journals of Mary Shelley", pp.1814~44 (1987), The Clarendon Press
  22. Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, "Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus: the 1818 Text" (1994), Oxford UP
  23. Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, "Notes on Poems of 1816 poems., Poetical Works" (1988), Oxford UP
  24. Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft, "Introduction to the 1831 text of Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus in Frankenstein", pp.193~96 (1994), Oxford UP
  25. Sunstein, Emily W., "Mary Shelley: Romance and Reality" (1989), The Johns Hopkins UP
  26. Williams, John, "Mary Shelley: A Literary Life" (2000), Macmillan

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)