대표이사의 근로자에 대한 손해배상책임 －대법원 2011.3.10. 선고 2010다13282 판결을 중심으로－
Representative Director's Liability to Third Persons
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Lately, Korea Supreme Court made a decision that representative director should be liable for pay damages to employees which are caused by his willfully sham closing of business based on the civil act article 750(torts). In addition to that judgement, Japan court decided that representative director should be liable for pay damages to employees which are caused by his management failure based on the Japan commercial article 266-3(1). The article Japan court referred to corresponds to Korea commercial act article 401(1). The Civil Act Article 750 provides that any person who causes losses to or inflicts injuries on another person by an unlawful act, willfully or negligently, shall be bound to make compensation for damages arising therefrom. The Commercial Act Article 401(1) provides that If directors have neglected to perform their duties wilfully or by gross negligence, they shall be jointly and severally liable for damages to third persons. These two decisions mentioned above are good examples that the civil act article 750 and the commercial act article 401(1) could play an important role to check the company directors' management. And also, if a management decision has a close relation to employment protection, those clauses could function as a check restraint used by employees
Abstract
Lately, Korea Supreme Court made a decision that representative director should be liable for pay damages to employees which are caused by his willfully sham closing of business based on the civil act article 750(torts). In addition to that judgement, Japan court decided that representative director should be liable for pay damages to employees which are caused by his management failure based on the Japan commercial article 266-3(1). The article Japan court referred to corresponds to Korea commercial act article 401(1). The Civil Act Article 750 provides that any person who causes losses to or inflicts injuries on another person by an unlawful act, willfully or negligently, shall be bound to make compensation for damages arising therefrom. The Commercial Act Article 401(1) provides that If directors have neglected to perform their duties wilfully or by gross negligence, they shall be jointly and severally liable for damages to third persons. These two decisions mentioned above are good examples that the civil act article 750 and the commercial act article 401(1) could play an important role to check the company directors' management. And also, if a management decision has a close relation to employment protection, those clauses could function as a check restraint used by employees
참고문헌 (16)
- 강대섭, "이사의 책임과 경영판단의 원칙", 상사판례연구 (2001), 한국상사판례학회
- 고재종, "경영판단의 원칙의 도입 여부에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 비교법학연구, 2 (2002), 한국비교법학회
- 권재열, "경영판단의 원칙의 도입에 관련된 문제점", 연세법학연구 (1995), 연세법학회
- 김형배, "노동법(제20판)" (2011), 박영사
- 박명서, "경영판단의 원칙", 기업법연구, (17), pp.27~58 (2004), 한국기업법학회
- 송인방, "이사의 책임제한과 경영판단의 원칙", 법학연구, (31), pp.263~286 (2008), 한국법학회
- 이철송, "회사법(제16판)" (2009), 박영사
- 임종률, "노동법(제9판)" (2011), 박영사
- 정진경, "부당해고와 위자료", 노동법연구, (7) (1998), 서울대 노동법연구회
- 정동윤, "회사법(제7판)" (2005), 박영사
- 최병규, "미국법상 경영판단의 원칙과 우리나라에서 도입입가능성", 안암법학 (2001), 안암법학회
- 최윤범, "경영판단의 원칙과 그 도입 가능성", 법학연구 (2000), 한국법학회
- 하경효, "부당해고시의 정신적 손해에 대한 손해배상", 판례연구 (1994), 고려대 법학연구원
- 東京地方裁判所商事硏究会, "商事關係訴訟" (2006), 靑林書院
- 新田秀樹, "会社法(第九版)" (2007), 弘文堂
- 靑竹正一, "新会社法(第二版)" (2008), 信仙社