포의 내러티브에 드러난 담론과 권력의 관계
The Relation between Discourse and Power in Foe’s Narrative
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
Park, Jin-a. “The Relation between Discourse and Power in Foe’s Narrative.” Studies on English Language & Literature. 33.2(2007): 95-115. This Essay traces the relation between discourse and power in white South African writer, J. M. Coetzee’s Foe. Coetzee rewrites the prototype of colonial discourse, Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and parodies Roxana to concentrate the issue of narrative and power. The central question “Who writes?” is taken up by counter-discourse Foe, it reflects the complicity between narrative mode and political oppression(power). In Foe the issue of Friday silence is foregrounded in the text, Coetzee let female narrater Susan Barton, who was excluded in Robinson Crusoe, leads narrative. But her narrative is controlled by Foe who is postmodern representation of 18C’s Daniel Defoe. Foe tries to restrict Susan’s narrative within his imperial plot. Finally Susan is entrapped in endless skepticism. It is closely related to Coetzee’s position in South Africa and his complicated postcoloniality. (Sungkyunkwan University)
참고문헌 (7)
- 왕철, "J. M. 쿳시의 대화적 소설" (2003), 서울: 태학사
- Attwell, "South Africa and the politics of Writing" (1993)
- White Writing, "On the Culture of Letters in South Africa" (1988)
- Gallagher, "A Story of South Africa Coetzee’s Fiction in Context" (1991)
- Gilbert, "The Madwoman in Attic" (1984)
- Sue, "Pen and Power: A Post-colonial Reading of J. M. Coetzee and Andr Brink" (1998), Atlanta: Rodopi
- Watson, Stephen, "Colonialism and the Novels of J. M. Coetzee", pp.13~36 (1996), New York: St. Martin