헤밍웨이 소설 접근법의 3대 기준(II): 실패작의 경우
Three Approaches to Understanding Ernest Hemingway’s Novels(II): Failed Works
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Soh, Soo-man. “Three Approaches to Understanding Ernest Hemingway’s Novels(II): Failed Works.” Studies in English Language & Literature. 37.2 (2011): 81-101. This paper aims to analyze four works of failure by Hemingway and to suggest the reasons why these novels failed by discussing the three methods useful in understanding Hemingway’s novels. The three approaches that are suggested in this paper are the essential factors in deciding the success or failure of Hemingway’s works. The three approaches are The Moment of Truth, The Tragic Hero, and The Iceberg Theory Style. All three of these factors are present in Hemingway’s successful works. However, his works of failure lack either one or two of these factors or omitted them completely. As stated above, this paper analyzes the three factors of such failed works as For Whom the Bell Tolls, Across the River and Into the Trees, To Have and Have Not, and The Garden of Eden. For Whom the Bell Tolls is considered as a work of failure because it is not written in the Iceberg Theory Style, although it has both a moment of truth and a tragic hero. Across the River and Into the Trees, To Have and Have Not, and The Garden of Eden are all considered to be failed novels because these three works do not possess any of the three factors at all. (Woosuk University)
Abstract
Soh, Soo-man. “Three Approaches to Understanding Ernest Hemingway’s Novels(II): Failed Works.” Studies in English Language & Literature. 37.2 (2011): 81-101. This paper aims to analyze four works of failure by Hemingway and to suggest the reasons why these novels failed by discussing the three methods useful in understanding Hemingway’s novels. The three approaches that are suggested in this paper are the essential factors in deciding the success or failure of Hemingway’s works. The three approaches are The Moment of Truth, The Tragic Hero, and The Iceberg Theory Style. All three of these factors are present in Hemingway’s successful works. However, his works of failure lack either one or two of these factors or omitted them completely. As stated above, this paper analyzes the three factors of such failed works as For Whom the Bell Tolls, Across the River and Into the Trees, To Have and Have Not, and The Garden of Eden. For Whom the Bell Tolls is considered as a work of failure because it is not written in the Iceberg Theory Style, although it has both a moment of truth and a tragic hero. Across the River and Into the Trees, To Have and Have Not, and The Garden of Eden are all considered to be failed novels because these three works do not possess any of the three factors at all. (Woosuk University)
참고문헌 (8)
- 소수만, "어니스트 헤밍웨이: 그의 인생과 작품세계" (2007), 도서출판 동인
- 소수만, "헤밍웨이 소설 접근법의 3대 기준(Ⅰ): 성공작의 경우", 영어영문학연구, 36(3), pp.49~68 (2010), 대한영어영문학회
- Hemingway, Ernest, "Across the River and Into the Trees" (1972), Penguin Books
- Hemingway, Ernest, "For Whom the Bell Tolls" (1969), Penguin Books
- Hemingway, Ernest, "The Garden of Eden" (1986), Charles Scribner’s Sons
- Hemingway, Ernest, "To Have and Have Not" (1970), Charles Scribner’s Sons
- Oliver, Charles M., "Ernest Hemingway A To Z: The Essential Reference to the Life and Work" (1999), Checkmark Books, Facts On File, Inc
- Wells, Elizabeth J., "A Statistical Analysis of the Prose Style of Ernest Hemingway: “Big Two-Hearted River.”, In The Short Stories of Ernest Hemingway: Critical Essay" (1975), Duke University Press