GMO 표시제의 확대 논쟁에 관한 연구
A Study on Debate of Expanding the GMO Labeling
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since 2001 NGOs have proposed the expanded GMO labeling system because of consumers right, especially, right to know and choose. On the contrary, food industries have reacted it because of cost burden increase and safety assessment. This debate faced new conditions. CODEX passed the guidelines of GMO labeling. In addition, the US, the most strenuous opponent, decided to end the opposition to GM labelling. In 2013, members of the National Assembly submitted 3 amendments of Food Sanitation Act, focused on expanding GMO labeling system. This means we have to accept the change and to expand the GMO labeling without exception. However, these 3 amendments have their own advantages and disadvantages. In considering how the law might be reformed, the most important thing is the guarantee of the consumers right in reviewing them. Therefore, consumers right is the key criterion in GMO labeling issues and it is expanding the GMO labeling system.
Abstract
Since 2001 NGOs have proposed the expanded GMO labeling system because of consumers right, especially, right to know and choose. On the contrary, food industries have reacted it because of cost burden increase and safety assessment. This debate faced new conditions. CODEX passed the guidelines of GMO labeling. In addition, the US, the most strenuous opponent, decided to end the opposition to GM labelling. In 2013, members of the National Assembly submitted 3 amendments of Food Sanitation Act, focused on expanding GMO labeling system. This means we have to accept the change and to expand the GMO labeling without exception. However, these 3 amendments have their own advantages and disadvantages. In considering how the law might be reformed, the most important thing is the guarantee of the consumers right in reviewing them. Therefore, consumers right is the key criterion in GMO labeling issues and it is expanding the GMO labeling system.
참고문헌 (19)
- 권영근, "GMO 논쟁상자를 다시 열다", 한겨레신문사, ~ (2010)
- 김은진, "LMO 제품의 위해성 관리에 관한 논의의 주요 쟁점과 과제", 경희법학, 43(1), pp.265~294 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김은진, "돈 못 버는 농민은 농사짓지 마라", 귀농통문, (여름)통권 : 50 (2009)
- 우리나라 식량안보의 문제점과 개선방안, "이철호", 한국과학기술한림원, ~, pp.55 (2009)
- 진현정, "GMO표시제 확대가 식품산업과 국내 경제에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구", 농업경영.정책연구, 36(2), pp.418~448 (2009), 한국농식품정책학회
- Ching-Fu Lin, "Scientification of Politics or Politicization of Science: Reassessing the Limits of International Food Safety Lawmaking", Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev, 15, pp.1~ (2013)
- Clive James, "Global Status of Commercialized Biotech", GM Crops: 2012, 2013
- Jack A. Bobo, "Two Decades of GE Food Labeling Debate Draw to an End—Will Anybody Notice?", IDAHO L. REV, 48, pp.251~ (2012)
- John A. Thomas, "Biotechnology and Safety Assessment" (2002), Academic Press
- Joint FAO, "WHO Food Standards Programe", Ccompilation of CODEX Texts Relevant to Labelling of Foods Derived from Modern Biotechnology, GL 76-2011, May 2011, pp.2011, ~
- UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, "United Nations Consumer Protection: Guidelines for Sustainable Consumption", E, 1998, pp.5, 1998[DOI]
- "국회 홈페이지", ~
- "농림축산식품부 홈페이지", ~
- "농식품부 농식품안전정보서비스 홈페이지", ~
- "바이오안전성정보센터 홈페이지", ~
- "식품의약품안전처 홈페이지", ~
- "CODEX 홈페이지", ~
- "Consumers International 홈페이지", ~
- "UN 홈페이지", ~