L2 Acquisition Status of English (In)transitivity on A C-selected Complement Factor
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined whether English L2ers (the second language learners of English) for Korean L1ers (the first language learners of Korean) are able to make use of each sentence type relating to complement factors after a certain verb in the structural production in accordance with Lee (2020)’s proposal. Here are the three predicted propositions presented step by step: First, the correction rate ranging from type 1 to type 5 will vary according to which element is most suitable in the complement position. Next, in the sentence type 2 and 5, deciding optional forms(S.C & O.C) with a noun or an adjective will be quite difficult to L2ers because of their conceptual lack of sentential perfectness. Lastly, it is predicted that English L2ers will pick up considerably confusing factors by L1's intervention of mother language. As a result, it turns out that these predictions are comparatively accepted via the actual questionnaire of 154 L2ers in class and additionally, the grammar group demonstrates significant difference from the conversation group on most sentence types (type 1, 3, 4 and 5) through SPSS program.
Abstract
This study examined whether English L2ers (the second language learners of English) for Korean L1ers (the first language learners of Korean) are able to make use of each sentence type relating to complement factors after a certain verb in the structural production in accordance with Lee (2020)’s proposal. Here are the three predicted propositions presented step by step: First, the correction rate ranging from type 1 to type 5 will vary according to which element is most suitable in the complement position. Next, in the sentence type 2 and 5, deciding optional forms(S.C & O.C) with a noun or an adjective will be quite difficult to L2ers because of their conceptual lack of sentential perfectness. Lastly, it is predicted that English L2ers will pick up considerably confusing factors by L1's intervention of mother language. As a result, it turns out that these predictions are comparatively accepted via the actual questionnaire of 154 L2ers in class and additionally, the grammar group demonstrates significant difference from the conversation group on most sentence types (type 1, 3, 4 and 5) through SPSS program.
참고문헌 (8)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Thirteen" (1986)
- Chomsky, Noam, "The view from Building 20" (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), The MIT Press
- Hornby, A. S., "A Guide to Patterns and Usage in English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting" (1975), Oxford University Press
- 김부자, "한국 대학생들의 영어 동사 하위범주화 자질 습득 정도 및 양상에 대한 연구", 영어영문학연구, 39(3), pp.131~167 (2013), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 김지현, "L2 Learners’ Use of Verb Transitivity Information in English Written Production", 영미연구, 49, pp.121~146 (2020), 영미연구소
- 이은경, "L2 Acquisition of English Verbs’ Syntactic Distinction on Intransitivity and Transitivity", 영어영문학연구, 46(3), pp.391~410 (2020), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
- Park Eun-Min, "A syntactic analysis of Error using Transitive Verbs in the English composition of University Students in Korea", Ph.D., pp.2013