본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Corpus-Based Study on Lexical Bundles in English Writings of Chinese Korean Minority College Students

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study aims to explore how Chinese Korean minority college students use English lexical bundles in their writings. Four English written corpora of LOCNESS, YELC, CKELC, and CHELC were involved in this study, all the corpora were constructed by collecting college students’ timed and untimed essays. Not only English native students’ writings but three groups of EFL students’ writings were investigated. The four-word English lexical bundles extracted from each corpus were adopted as the data. By examining students’ actual writing, it found that Chinese Korean students overused lexical bundles with attitudinal expressions, and the same phenomenon was identified in L1 Korean students’ writings but not in Ll Chinese students’. The EFL students of L1 Korean, L1 Chinese and Chinese Korean all overused colloquial bundles and they all tended to use the same bundle types repeatedly. Compared with bundle tokens, all EFL students used a limited number of bundle types. In terms of lexical bundle structure, Chinese Korean students and L1 Chinese students preferred using prepositional bundles most, whereas L1 Korean students relied heavily on verbal bundles. All three EFL group students overused verbal bundles but underused nominal bundles. It is suggested that the EFL learners need to be exposed to a variety of lexical bundles.

Abstract

This study aims to explore how Chinese Korean minority college students use English lexical bundles in their writings. Four English written corpora of LOCNESS, YELC, CKELC, and CHELC were involved in this study, all the corpora were constructed by collecting college students’ timed and untimed essays. Not only English native students’ writings but three groups of EFL students’ writings were investigated. The four-word English lexical bundles extracted from each corpus were adopted as the data. By examining students’ actual writing, it found that Chinese Korean students overused lexical bundles with attitudinal expressions, and the same phenomenon was identified in L1 Korean students’ writings but not in Ll Chinese students’. The EFL students of L1 Korean, L1 Chinese and Chinese Korean all overused colloquial bundles and they all tended to use the same bundle types repeatedly. Compared with bundle tokens, all EFL students used a limited number of bundle types. In terms of lexical bundle structure, Chinese Korean students and L1 Chinese students preferred using prepositional bundles most, whereas L1 Korean students relied heavily on verbal bundles. All three EFL group students overused verbal bundles but underused nominal bundles. It is suggested that the EFL learners need to be exposed to a variety of lexical bundles.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Ädel, Annelie, "Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English : A lexical bundles approach", English for Specific Purposes, 31, pp.81~92 (2012)
  2. Alsagoff, Lubna, "Interpreting error patterns in a longitudinal primary school corpus of writing", The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), pp.114~124 (2016)
  3. Appel, Randy, "L1 differences in L2 English academic writing : A lexical bundles analysis", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, pp.1~15 (2020)
  4. Biber, Douglas, "If you look at… : Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks", Applied linguistics, 25(3), pp.371~405 (2004)
  5. Biber, Douglas, "Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers", English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), pp.263~286 (2007)
  6. Biber, Douglas, "The Longman grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Longman
  7. Chen, Yu-Hua, "Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing", Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), pp.30~49 (2010)
  8. Cortes, Viviana, "The purpose of this study is to : Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, pp.33~43 (2013)
  9. Cowie, Anthony P, "Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications" (1998), Oxford University Press
  10. Ellis, Nick C., "Formulaic language and second language acquisition : Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.17~44 (2012)
  11. Granger, Sylviane, "Contrastive interlanguage analysis : a reappraisal", International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), pp.7~24 (2015)
  12. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, "Spoken and Written Language" (1989), Oxford University Press
  13. Hoey, Michael, "Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language" (2005), Routledge
  14. Huang, Kaisheng, "More does not mean better : Frequency and accuracy analysis of lexical bundles in Chinese EFL learners’ essay writing", System, 53, pp.13~23 (2015)
  15. Hunston, Susan, "Pattern grammar: A corpus driven approach to the lexical grammar of English" (2000), John Benjamins Publishing
  16. Hyland, Ken, "Bundles in academic discourse", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.150~169 (2012)
  17. 김정현, "Lexical Bundles in Korean College Students’ English Essays: A Corpus-based Comparative Study", 영어어문교육, 19(3), pp.157~179 (2013), 한국영어어문교육학회
  18. 나지영, "A Corpus Analysis of the Preposition of in Korean College Matriculants’ Writing", 영어교육, 70(3), pp.99~115 (2015), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
  19. 이혜경, "Features of Lexical Bundles in Academic Writing by Non-Native vis-à-vie Native Speakers of English", 영어학연구, 23(2), pp.67~88 (2017), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  20. Lee, Young Eun, "The use of English prepositions in lexical bundles in essays written by Korean university students", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, pp.1~10 (2020)
  21. Li, Mo, "Exploring lexical bundles in low proficiency level L2 learners’ English writing : an ETS corpus study", Applied Linguistics Review, 12(3), pp.1~27 (2021)
  22. Lin, Yen Liang, "Contrastive analysis of adolescent learner interlanguage in asynchronous online communication : a keyness approach", System, 55, pp.53~62 (2015)
  23. Lou, Bao Cui, "A comparative corpus-based study of lexical bundles in journal articles written by Chinese and international science scholars", Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 42(6), pp.30~41 (2021)
  24. Millar, Neil, "The processing of malformed formulaic language", Applied Linguistics, 32(2), pp.129~148 (2011)
  25. Paquot, Magali, "Lexical bundles and L1 transfer effects", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(3), pp.391~417 (2013)
  26. Paquot, Magali, "Formulaic language in learner corpora", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.130~149 (2012)
  27. Qi, Yan, "Use of formulaic sequences in monologues of Chinese EFL learners", System, 39(2), pp.164~174 (2011)
  28. Sinclair, John, "Corpus, concordance, collocation" (1991), Oxford University Press
  29. Zhang, Zhen Ai., "A comprehensive review of English teaching for learners of Korean ethnic group in China", Journal of Yanbian University, 41(6), pp.71~77 (2008)
  30. Zhen Ai, "On initial stage of English education based on bilinguals", Journal of Yanbian University, 34(4), pp.73~77 (2001)
  31. Zhao, Qing, "Corpus-based analysis of chunks in college students’ writing", Journal of civil aviation flight university of China, 32(4), pp.72~76 (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)