Research on Korea Financial Regulatory Issues for the FinTech Development
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The development of FinTech can bring out a host of new financial business model which can fill a niche not provided through traditional lending industry. For the success of FinTech industry, current statutory and regulatory regime governing FinTech in some parts are not only too old to cover the new financial business model but also not enough to protect financial consumers. South Korean government and national assembly trying to deregulate financial regulation which has been pointed out as four obstacles to FinTech development. First, the amendment of “Support for Small and Medium Enterprise Establishment Act” enables KRW 60 billion engel fund to invest FinTech in Korea. Second, Face-to-face procedure of the due diligence of CIP regulation is expected to lower the standard. For more speed and convenience, the author suggests biometric identification system could be adopted. Third, Current 4% restriction of non-banking company’s ownership of bank equity ownership is going to lower the ratio around 10~30%, which means allowing non-banking company’s “control” of bank. Fourth, Korean national assembly propose Securities Based Crowdfunding Regulations. For investor protection, however, the author insists broker-dealer’s liability for issuer’s disclosure and internet advertising regulations are necessity for securities based crowdfunding regulations. Finally, the author insists that the security-related issues must be resolved for the success of FinTech business.
Abstract
The development of FinTech can bring out a host of new financial business model which can fill a niche not provided through traditional lending industry. For the success of FinTech industry, current statutory and regulatory regime governing FinTech in some parts are not only too old to cover the new financial business model but also not enough to protect financial consumers. South Korean government and national assembly trying to deregulate financial regulation which has been pointed out as four obstacles to FinTech development. First, the amendment of “Support for Small and Medium Enterprise Establishment Act” enables KRW 60 billion engel fund to invest FinTech in Korea. Second, Face-to-face procedure of the due diligence of CIP regulation is expected to lower the standard. For more speed and convenience, the author suggests biometric identification system could be adopted. Third, Current 4% restriction of non-banking company’s ownership of bank equity ownership is going to lower the ratio around 10~30%, which means allowing non-banking company’s “control” of bank. Fourth, Korean national assembly propose Securities Based Crowdfunding Regulations. For investor protection, however, the author insists broker-dealer’s liability for issuer’s disclosure and internet advertising regulations are necessity for securities based crowdfunding regulations. Finally, the author insists that the security-related issues must be resolved for the success of FinTech business.
참고문헌 (14)
- C. Steven Bradford, "Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws", Colum. Bus. L. Rev, 2012(1) (2012)
- Christine Hurt, "Pricing Disintermediation: Crowdfunding and Online Auction IPOS", U. Ill. L. Rev, 2015(217) (2015)
- David Groshoff, "Crowdfunding 6.0: Does the SEC’s Fintech Law Failure Reveal the Agency’s True Mission to Protect—solely Accredited—Investors?", Ohio St. Entrepreneurial Bus. L.J, 9(277) (2015)
- Gregory D. Deschler, "Wisdom of the Intermediary Crowd: What the Proposed Rules Mean for Ambitious Crowdfunding Intermedia- ries", St. Louis U. L.J, 58(1145) (2014)
- Guy Noyes, "Kicking Start-ups Out of Online Financial Markets: Why the FTC Should Regulate Websites to Supplement the SEC", Intell. Prop. L. Bull, 19(29) (2014)
- Jamie Hopkins, "Not all That Glitters is Gold—Limitations of Equity Crowdfunding Regulations", Duq. Bus. L.J, 16(1) (2015)
- Joan MacLeod Heminway, "Business Lawyering in the Crowdfunding ERA", Am. U. Bus. L. Rev, 3(149), pp.149~ (2014)
- Joan MacLeod Hemigway, "Proceed at your peril: Crowdfunding and the Securities Act of 1933", Tenn. L. Rev, 78(879) (2011)
- Joan MacLeod Heminway, "The New Intermediary on the Block: Funding Portals Under the Crowdfund Act", U.C. Davis Bus. L.J, 13(177) (2013)
- John S. Wroldsen, "The Crowdfund Act’s Strange Bedfellows: Democracy and Start-up Company Investing", U. Kan. L. Rev, 62(357) (2013)
- John S. Wroldsen, "The Social Network and the Crowdfund Act: Zuckerberg, Saverin, and Venture Capitalist’s Diluion of the Crowd", Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L, 15(583) (2013)
- Robert H. Steinhoff, "The Next British Invasion is Securities Crowd- funding: How Issuing Non-registered Securities Through the Crowd can Succeed in the United States", U. Colo. L. Rev, 86(661) (2015)
- Thomas V. Powers, "SEC Regulation of Crowdfunding Intermediaries under Title III of the JOBS Act", Banking & Fin. Services Pol'y Rep, 31(10), pp.1~ (2012)
- Willian J. Schroer, "Generations X,Y,Z and the others", The journal of the Household Goods Forwarders Association of America, xl (2008)