본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

القياس النحوي: دراسة مقارنة بين الخليل بن أحمد والفرّاء

Syntactic Analogy: Comparative Study between Al-Khalil Bin Ahmad and Al- Fara'

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Syntactic analogy is an important feature of the theory of Arabic syntax. Understanding analogy is one of the fundamental syntactic topics that are related to the comprehension of numerous syntactic issues such as the origin and the derivatives, the vowel, analogy as well as others. Because analogy and the origins of syntax are strongly linked with jurisprudent analogy, the origins of jurisprudence and morphology, the researchers of this study examine a number of relevant jurisprudent references. In accordance with that, the researchers conducted an analysis of the works of famous linguists such as al-Khalil bin Ahmad al-Farahidi and al-Farra’ based on a comparative study of the view of each pertaining to the topic of syntactic analogy and its origins.

Abstract

Syntactic analogy is an important feature of the theory of Arabic syntax. Understanding analogy is one of the fundamental syntactic topics that are related to the comprehension of numerous syntactic issues such as the origin and the derivatives, the vowel, analogy as well as others. Because analogy and the origins of syntax are strongly linked with jurisprudent analogy, the origins of jurisprudence and morphology, the researchers of this study examine a number of relevant jurisprudent references. In accordance with that, the researchers conducted an analysis of the works of famous linguists such as al-Khalil bin Ahmad al-Farahidi and al-Farra’ based on a comparative study of the view of each pertaining to the topic of syntactic analogy and its origins.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)