분만경험 측정도구의 체계적 고찰
A Systematic Review of Birth Experience Assessment Instrument
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and to describe characteristics of the birth experience assessment instrument. Methods: Literature related to the development of the birth experience assessment instrument was examined using a systematic review method. A literature search was conducted using the keywords as ‘[normal birth]; [satisfac* OR care quality]; [instrument OR scale] AND (development)’ through PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and RISS. The search used quality appraisal through QUADAS (Quality Assessment of studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included Systemic reviews) yielding 17 records. Results: The birth experience assessment instrument was categorized for instrumental characteristics: birth satisfaction (n=8), perception of labor experience (n=5), and birth care quality assessment in normal and operative birth experiences (n=4). Important key elements for content characteristics were as follows: nursing practice (n=10), pain control (n=5), environment (n=5), participation (n=4), and support (n=4). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the birth experience instrument is appropriate for measuring quality of birth care in various clinical conditions. This review of the birth experience instrument reports that an appropriate psychometric tool for enhancing quality of birth care is important.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and to describe characteristics of the birth experience assessment instrument. Methods: Literature related to the development of the birth experience assessment instrument was examined using a systematic review method. A literature search was conducted using the keywords as ‘[normal birth]; [satisfac* OR care quality]; [instrument OR scale] AND (development)’ through PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and RISS. The search used quality appraisal through QUADAS (Quality Assessment of studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included Systemic reviews) yielding 17 records. Results: The birth experience assessment instrument was categorized for instrumental characteristics: birth satisfaction (n=8), perception of labor experience (n=5), and birth care quality assessment in normal and operative birth experiences (n=4). Important key elements for content characteristics were as follows: nursing practice (n=10), pain control (n=5), environment (n=5), participation (n=4), and support (n=4). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the birth experience instrument is appropriate for measuring quality of birth care in various clinical conditions. This review of the birth experience instrument reports that an appropriate psychometric tool for enhancing quality of birth care is important.
참고문헌 (25)
- "2017 population statistics" (2017)[URL]
- Janssen PA, "Development and psychometric testing of the care in obstetrics : Measure for testing satisfaction(COMFORTS)scale", Research in Nursing and Health, 29(1), pp.51~60 (2006)
- Sandin-Bojö AK, "Women's perception of intrapartal care in relation to WHO recommendations", Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(22), pp.2993~3003 (2008)
- Martin CH, "The birth satisfaction scale", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 24(2), pp.124~135 (2011)
- Ford E, "Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth(SCBI)", Journal of Women's Health, 18(2), pp.245~252 (2009)
- Mohammad K, "Women's satisfaction with hospital-based intrapartum care : A Jordanian study", International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 6(3), pp.32~39 (2014)
- Smith LF, "Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire : Dimensions, validity, and internal reliability", Quality in Health Care, 10(1), pp.17~22 (2001)
- Harvey S, "Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care", Midwifery, 18(4), pp.260~267 (2002)
- Hodnett ED, "Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth : A systemic review", American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(5), pp.160~172 (2002)
- Denker A, "Childbirth experience questionnaire(CEQ) : Development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument", BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10, pp.81~ (2010)
- Uludag E, "Development and testing of women's perception for the scale of supportive care given during labor", Pain Management Nursing, 16(5), pp.751~758 (2015)
- Kim SY, "NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analysis for intervention", pp.271~ (2011), National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency
- Whiting P, "The development of QUADAS : A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews", BMC Medical Research of Methodology, 3(25), pp.1~13 (2003)
- Whiting PF, "QUADAS-2 : A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies", Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(8), pp.529~536 (2011)
- Fleiss JL, "Statistical methods for rates and proportions", pp.336~ (2003), Wiley, John and Sons
- Redshaw M, "Validation of a perceptions of care adjective checklist", Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15(2), pp.281~288 (2009)
- Sandin Bojö AK, "Midwifery care : Development of an instrument to measure quality based on the World Health Organization's classification of care in normal birth", Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(1), pp.75~83 (2004)
- Cavalho EMP, "Adherence to best care practices in normal birth : Construction and validation of an instrument", Journal of School of Nursing, 49(6), pp.889~897 (2015)
- Fleming SE, "Birth Satisfaction Scale", Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised(BSS, Midwifery, pp.2016, 41[DOI]
- Hollins Martin CJ, "Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised(BSS-R)", Midwifery, 30(6), pp.610~619 (2014)
- Safe Motherhood Unit. Care in normal birth: A practical guide, "Maternal and Newborn Health", pp.1996, World Health Organization
- Simbar M, "Assessment of quality of midwifery care in labour and delivery wards of selected Kordestan Medical Science University hospital", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 22(3), pp.266~277 (2009)
- Gungor I, "Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and cesarean birth", Midwifery, 28(3), pp.348~357 (2012)
- Lavender T, "Managing labor using partograms with different action lines : A prospective study of women's view", Birth, 26(2), pp.89~96 (1999)
- 박광희, "조산 및 저출생체중아를 분만한 산부의 Labor Support Behaviors의 일대일 적용 및 배우자의 분만참여에 따른 분만만족도와 분만결과 비교", 임상간호연구, 17(2), pp.239~250 (2011), 병원간호사회