憲宗 10년(1844) 懷平君 李元慶 謀反 사건과 그 의미 - 哲宗 즉위의 숨겨진 배경 -
Hoipyeonggun Lee Won-gyeong's Rebellion in the 10th Year of King Heonjong's Reign(1844) and Its Meanings - Hidden Background of the Enthronement of King Cheoljong -
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The rebellion raised by Hoipyeonggun Lee Won-gyeong used to be difficult to approach for its facts since the related records in the chronicles were deleted after the enthronement of King Cheoljong. It is such a fortunate case, however, that some examination records including Chuangeupgukan and Podocheongdeungrok remain to allow for an investigation into the rebellion. The main figure of the event was Hoipyeonggun Lee Won-gyeong, who was the eldest son of Jeongye Daewongun, who was the third eldest son of Euneongun. He was thus the closest to the royal family in terms of lineage and therefore the most powerful candidate for the next throne. However, his family had been bound to the status of criminal after Euneongun and fell to the status of common people. Such contradictory situations provided the setting for the rebellion. Lee Won-gyeong's complaints around his family's fall escalated to “rebellion" as he started to get along with the noble class including the former royal court officials that approached him for his lineage. The “rebellion," however, was merely a modest expectation for the uncertain future that was not accompanied by concrete revolt or replacement plans. After Hoipyeonggun was sacrificed in the rebellion, the royal family shrank even further. Under those circumstances, it was fairly difficult to hope for the recovery of the royal power by King Cheoljong, who was selected by the political group of the maternal relatives. Focusing on the reconstruction of the rebellion with the examination records, the study failed to take an overall approach toward it from a perspective of encompassing the entire political history of those days and thus suggests that future study will address the shortcoming. In addition, researches should be conducted on the records and documents management system of the days in order to understand the background of the examination records being preserved intact despite the massive deletion of the chronicles at that time.
Abstract
The rebellion raised by Hoipyeonggun Lee Won-gyeong used to be difficult to approach for its facts since the related records in the chronicles were deleted after the enthronement of King Cheoljong. It is such a fortunate case, however, that some examination records including Chuangeupgukan and Podocheongdeungrok remain to allow for an investigation into the rebellion. The main figure of the event was Hoipyeonggun Lee Won-gyeong, who was the eldest son of Jeongye Daewongun, who was the third eldest son of Euneongun. He was thus the closest to the royal family in terms of lineage and therefore the most powerful candidate for the next throne. However, his family had been bound to the status of criminal after Euneongun and fell to the status of common people. Such contradictory situations provided the setting for the rebellion. Lee Won-gyeong's complaints around his family's fall escalated to “rebellion" as he started to get along with the noble class including the former royal court officials that approached him for his lineage. The “rebellion," however, was merely a modest expectation for the uncertain future that was not accompanied by concrete revolt or replacement plans. After Hoipyeonggun was sacrificed in the rebellion, the royal family shrank even further. Under those circumstances, it was fairly difficult to hope for the recovery of the royal power by King Cheoljong, who was selected by the political group of the maternal relatives. Focusing on the reconstruction of the rebellion with the examination records, the study failed to take an overall approach toward it from a perspective of encompassing the entire political history of those days and thus suggests that future study will address the shortcoming. In addition, researches should be conducted on the records and documents management system of the days in order to understand the background of the examination records being preserved intact despite the massive deletion of the chronicles at that time.
참고문헌 (17)
- 윤정애, "정치사 연구의 동향과 과제`in조선정치사 1800~1863", pp.36~37 (1990), 청년사
- 洪順敏, "19세기 왕위의 승계과정과 정통성", 國史館論叢, 40, pp.26~ (1992), 국사편찬위원회
- 오항녕, "조선후기 국사체계(國史體系)의 변동에 관한 시론-실록(實錄)에서 일성록(日省錄)으로-", 역사와 현실, (52), pp.265~296 (2004), 한국역사연구회
- 李泰鎭, "《日省錄》刀削의 실상과 경위", 韓國文化, 10, pp.61~ (1989), 한국문화연구소
- 哲宗實錄, "哲宗實錄", ~
- 철종실록, "철종실록", ~
- 憲宗實錄, "憲宗實錄", ~
- "璿源續譜", 莊祖懿皇帝子孫錄, ~
- 英祖實錄, "英祖實錄", ~
- 正祖實錄, "正祖實錄", ~
- 純祖實錄, "純祖實錄", ~
- 순조실록, "순조실록", ~
- 추안급국안, "추안급국안", ~
- 영조실록, "영조실록", ~
- 정조실록, "정조실록", ~
- 포도청등록, "포도청등록", 민순용의 진술, ~
- 헌종실록, "헌종실록", ~
