申采浩의 시대구분과 고려·조선시대사 인식
Sin Chaeho's Periodization and Historical Notion on Goryeo, Joseon Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As we all know, Sin Chaeho, who was representative nationalistic historian in early 20th century, paid great attention to ancient korean history rather than medieval or modern korean history. This tendency was originated from his will and desire to make historical korea independent from foreign powers, because according to his view, only in ancient times korea preserve the independent, and struggled with foreign powers such as china. On the contrary, Goryeo and Joseon dynasty period was filled with dependent spirit because of buddhism and confucianism. Anyway, it seems that Sin Chaeho did not completely deny the meaning of that period. As one of ways to establish national identity, he emphasized to preserve the national characteristics(國粹) which consist of ancestral absolute beauty in religion, language, history, customs and so on. Needless to say, core of national characteristics was seongyo(仙敎) in ancient times, but he admitted the virtue of fundamental confucianism, and buddhism simultaneously. He thought that the virtue of fundamental confucianism did not realized well in Joseon period except Jo Gwangjo, Yi Hwang, and the possibility of realization of fundamental confucianism was depend on the fact how figures deal with confucianism. In case of realization of fundamental confucianism, it could be included in the category of national characteristics. In this context, Sin Chaeho paid attention to some distingushed figures of Joseon dynasty such as Bak Jiwon, Han Baekgyeom, Yi Ik, Jeong Yakyong who tried to reach and realize virtue of ancient confucianism by way of studying a lot of classics. This means that he regarded Joseon period as the period of preservation national characteristics, whereas he rated Joseon period in the aspect of political military ability poorly.
Abstract
As we all know, Sin Chaeho, who was representative nationalistic historian in early 20th century, paid great attention to ancient korean history rather than medieval or modern korean history. This tendency was originated from his will and desire to make historical korea independent from foreign powers, because according to his view, only in ancient times korea preserve the independent, and struggled with foreign powers such as china. On the contrary, Goryeo and Joseon dynasty period was filled with dependent spirit because of buddhism and confucianism. Anyway, it seems that Sin Chaeho did not completely deny the meaning of that period. As one of ways to establish national identity, he emphasized to preserve the national characteristics(國粹) which consist of ancestral absolute beauty in religion, language, history, customs and so on. Needless to say, core of national characteristics was seongyo(仙敎) in ancient times, but he admitted the virtue of fundamental confucianism, and buddhism simultaneously. He thought that the virtue of fundamental confucianism did not realized well in Joseon period except Jo Gwangjo, Yi Hwang, and the possibility of realization of fundamental confucianism was depend on the fact how figures deal with confucianism. In case of realization of fundamental confucianism, it could be included in the category of national characteristics. In this context, Sin Chaeho paid attention to some distingushed figures of Joseon dynasty such as Bak Jiwon, Han Baekgyeom, Yi Ik, Jeong Yakyong who tried to reach and realize virtue of ancient confucianism by way of studying a lot of classics. This means that he regarded Joseon period as the period of preservation national characteristics, whereas he rated Joseon period in the aspect of political military ability poorly.
참고문헌 (21)
- 단재신채호전집편찬위원회, "단재신채호전집" (2007), 독립기념관 한국독립운동사연구소
- 강만길, "일제시대의 반식민사학론, in 한국사학사의 연구" (1985), 을유문화사
- 김기승, "단재의 사상적 변화와 유교", 대동문화연구, 29 (1994)
- 김영하, "단재 신채호의 신라삼국통일론", 민족문화연구, 17 (1983)
- 박성수, "단재의 고대사관, in 소헌남도영박사화갑기념사학논총" (1984), 태학사
- 박찬승, "한말 신채호의 역사관과 역사학", 한국문화, 9 (1988)
- 배용일, "신채호의 고대사인식고", 백산학보, 23 (1977)
- 신일철, "신채호의 역사사상연구" (1981), 고려대학교 출판부
- 앙드레 슈미트, "제국 그 사이의 한국 1895~1919" (2009), 휴머니스트
- 윤사순, "단재의 민족주체사상", 아세아학보, 18 (1986)
- 이만열, "단재 신채호의 고대사인식 시고", 한국사연구, 15 (1977)
- 이만열, "신채호", 한국사시민강좌, 14 (1994)
- 이만열, "신채호의 민족주의사학", 단재신채호선생순국60주년기념학술대회 : 신채호와 한국민족주의 (1996), 단재 신채호선생기념사업회
- 이만열, "단재 신채호의 역사학 연구" (1990), 문학과 지성사
- 이윤화, "양계초와 신채호 사학의 비교시론", 역사교육논집, 17 (1992)
- 이을호, "단재사학에 있어서의 단군의 문제, in 단재 신채호와 민족사관" (1980), 형설출판사
- 임상석, "신채호 연구의 잃어버린 한 고리 - 「大東帝國史敍言」의 발견 -", 민족문화연구, 38, pp.209~245 (2003), 민족문화연구원
- 정창렬, "한말 신채호의 역사의식, in 손보기박사정년기념한국사학논총" (1988), 지식산업사
- 최광식, "『天鼓』의 '考古'편에 보이는 신채호의 고대사 인식", 韓國史學史學報, (3), pp.281~305 (2001), 한국사학사학회
- 최홍규, "신채호의 민족주의 사상" (1983), 형설출판사
- 한영우, "한국민족주의역사학" (1994), 일조각
