壬戌民亂期 省齋 柳重敎의 三政論
Seongje Yu, Jung-gyo's Samjeong Theory during the Imsul Riot period
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The local ruling was made on the basis of a strong authority of local officer during the 19th Joseon Dynasty. This was the result of diverse institutional reforms, such as Daedongbeop and Gyunyeokbeop during the 17th~18th century. However, the reinforcement of a local officer's authority became a contributor to various problems, which finally resulted in Imsul Riot. Yu, Jung-gyo came to draw up Samjeong Policy as a representative of Hwaseo School. Yu, Jung-gyo judged that the cause of tax-imposition problems lay in unequal tax collection, together with every sort of miscellaneous taxes. He advocated the implementation of Yangjeon, Dongpo, and Sachang system. In order to such schemes into practice, it was necessary for the government authority, symbolized as the authority of a strong local officer, to do self-regulation. Nevertheless, even if the state authority was well controlled, it might have caused various disturbances if this power directly penetrated into the hyangchon society Yu, Jung-gyo thought it's necessary to intensify the function of the hyangchon society to prevent such evils. In addition, Yu, Jung-gyo argued that a part of the authority of taxation and punishment power should be transferred to Myeon-society Ri-society. He argued that intensification of autonomy order of hyangchon society would be the key to the high efficiency of tax imposition, and eradication of corruption and graft.
Abstract
The local ruling was made on the basis of a strong authority of local officer during the 19th Joseon Dynasty. This was the result of diverse institutional reforms, such as Daedongbeop and Gyunyeokbeop during the 17th~18th century. However, the reinforcement of a local officer's authority became a contributor to various problems, which finally resulted in Imsul Riot. Yu, Jung-gyo came to draw up Samjeong Policy as a representative of Hwaseo School. Yu, Jung-gyo judged that the cause of tax-imposition problems lay in unequal tax collection, together with every sort of miscellaneous taxes. He advocated the implementation of Yangjeon, Dongpo, and Sachang system. In order to such schemes into practice, it was necessary for the government authority, symbolized as the authority of a strong local officer, to do self-regulation. Nevertheless, even if the state authority was well controlled, it might have caused various disturbances if this power directly penetrated into the hyangchon society Yu, Jung-gyo thought it's necessary to intensify the function of the hyangchon society to prevent such evils. In addition, Yu, Jung-gyo argued that a part of the authority of taxation and punishment power should be transferred to Myeon-society Ri-society. He argued that intensification of autonomy order of hyangchon society would be the key to the high efficiency of tax imposition, and eradication of corruption and graft.
참고문헌 (36)
- 고석규, "19세기 조선의 향촌사회연구 -지배와 저항의 구조-" (1998), 서울대출판부
- 김옥근, "朝鮮王朝財政史硏究 Ⅱ, Ⅲ" (1988)
- 덕성 외지자, "조선후기 공납청부제와 중인층공인", 박사, 사학, pp.2002
- 망원한국사연구실 19세기농민항쟁분과, "1862년 농민항쟁" (1988), 동녘
- 문용식, "조선후기 賑政과 還穀運營" (2000), 경인문화사
- 박성순, "朝鮮後期 華西 李恒老의 衛正斥邪思想" (2003), 경인출판사
- 송양섭, "朝鮮後期 屯田硏究" (2006), 경인문화사
- 송찬섭, "朝鮮後期 還穀制改革硏究" (2002), 서울대학교출판부
- 양진석, "17ㆍ18세기 還穀制度의 운영과 機能變化", 박사, pp.1998
- 오영섭, "화서학파의 사상과 민족운동 (저서)" (1999), 국학자료원
- 이정철, "대동법 ; 조선최고의 개혁" (2010), 역사비평사
- 이해준, "조선시기촌락사" (1996), 민족문화사
- 정진영, "조선시대향촌사회사" (1988), 한길사
- 한국역사연구회 토지대장연구반, "조선후기 경자양전연구" (2008), 혜안
- 김경란, "임술민란 전후 全羅道의 軍政운영과 殖利문제", 韓國史學報, (49), pp.91~120 (2012), 고려사학회
- 金玉根, "朝鮮後期 軍事財政의 良役依存度에 관하여 -兵曹3軍門을 중심으로, In 한국자본주의 성격논쟁" (1988), 대왕사
- 김용섭, "환곡제의 이정과 사창제", 동방학지, 34 (1982)
- 김용섭, "조선철종조의 응지삼정소와 ‘삼정이정책’, In 한국근대농업사연구, 상" (1984), 일조각
- 문광균, "17세기 경상도지역 공물수취체제와 영남대동법의 실시", 韓國史學報, (46), pp.49~85 (2012), 고려사학회
- 박광성, "진주민란의 연구 -이정정설치와 삼정교구책을 중심으로", 인천교대논문집, 3 (1968)
- 박준성, "17·18세기 궁방전의 확대와 소유형태의 변화", 한국사론, 11 (1984)
- 송양섭, "19세기 良役收取法의 변화 : 洞布制의 성립과 관련하여", 한국사연구, 89 (1995)
- 송양섭, "임술민란기 부세문제 인식과 三政改革의 방향", 韓國史學報, (49), pp.7~53 (2012), 고려사학회
- 송양섭, "균역법의 시행과 균역청의 재정운영 -급대재원확보와 운영을 중심으로-, In 영조의 국가정책과 정치이념" (2012), 한국학중앙연구원출판부
- 송찬섭, "1862년 三政釐整廳의 구성과 삼정이정책", 韓國史學報, (49), pp.55~90 (2012), 고려사학회
- 송찬식, "李朝時代 還上取耗補用考", 역사학보, 27 (1965)
- 양진석, "이단하의 사창제실행론", 한국문화, 20 (1998)
- 오미일, "안정복의 사창에 대한 연구", 국사관논총, 48 (1993)
- 오일주, "조선후기 재정구조의 변동과 환곡의 부세화", 實學思想硏究, 3 (1992)
- 이철성, "18세기 田稅 比摠制의 實施와 그 성격", 한국사연구, 81 (1993)
- 이철성, "숙종 경자양전의 이상과 현실, In 17·18세기 전정운영론과 전세제도연구" (2003), 선인
- 임혜련, "철종대 정국과 권력 집중 양상－임술민란 배경과 관련하여－", 韓國史學報, (49), pp.121~158 (2012), 고려사학회
- 鄭萬祚, "朝鮮後期 良役變通論議와 良役對策", 國史館論叢, 17 (1990)
- 정연식, "17·18세기 良役均一化政策의 推移", 한국사론, 13 (1985)
- 차문섭, "壬亂以後의 良役과 均役法의 成立", 史學硏究, 10·11 (1961)
- 한영국, "大同法의 실시", 한국사, 13 (1973)