윤증의 학문과 실학
Yun Jeung and His Scholarship
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present essay explores Yun Jeung's scholarship and its relation to the Shilhak (實學). Unlike other late Joseon scholars, Yun Jeung frequently used the term Shilhak in his writings. He believed that Shilhak was the ultimate aim for every scholar at the time. There have been disputes over the relationship between Yun Jeung's Shilhak and Jujahak (朱子學). While his Shilhak was largely considered the scholarship based on Jujahak, this may not be true since he criticized Song Shiyeol and his followers' Juja Absolutism (朱子絶對主義). He pursued the freedom of thought raising problems and being involved in many discussions and arguments. He emphasized practical utility and pragmatism, which was furthered by his continuous interest in practical scholarship related to Gyeongsechiyong (經世致用). Yun Jeung's scholarship was succeeded by his students led by Gwon Yijin. His scholarship reveals some differences from other late Joseon Shilhak scholars, which indicates his unique position in history of late Joseon scholarship.
Abstract
The present essay explores Yun Jeung's scholarship and its relation to the Shilhak (實學). Unlike other late Joseon scholars, Yun Jeung frequently used the term Shilhak in his writings. He believed that Shilhak was the ultimate aim for every scholar at the time. There have been disputes over the relationship between Yun Jeung's Shilhak and Jujahak (朱子學). While his Shilhak was largely considered the scholarship based on Jujahak, this may not be true since he criticized Song Shiyeol and his followers' Juja Absolutism (朱子絶對主義). He pursued the freedom of thought raising problems and being involved in many discussions and arguments. He emphasized practical utility and pragmatism, which was furthered by his continuous interest in practical scholarship related to Gyeongsechiyong (經世致用). Yun Jeung's scholarship was succeeded by his students led by Gwon Yijin. His scholarship reveals some differences from other late Joseon Shilhak scholars, which indicates his unique position in history of late Joseon scholarship.
참고문헌 (31)
- 충남대 유학연구소, "무실과 실심의 유학자 명재 윤증" (2001)
- 김수태, "유회당 권이진의 『동경잡기간오』", 도산학보, 6 (1997)
- 한우근, "명재 윤증의 실학관 - 실학의 개념 재론-", 동국사학, 6 (1960)
- 한우근, "조선시대사상사연구논고" (2001)
- "명재유고", ~
- 윤사순, "명재 윤증의 성리학적 실학", 도산학보, 4 (1995)
- 한우근, "조선시대 실학의 개념에 대하여", 진단학보 (1958)
- 이은순, "명재 윤증의 생애와 사회개혁사상", 역사문화연구, 18, pp.89~114 (2003), 역사문화연구소
- 한영우, "실학 연구의 어제와 오늘, In 다시, 실학이란 무엇인가", pp.34~ (2007)
- 김세정, "명재 윤증과 서계 박세당의 학문과 교유(交遊) 관계", 동서철학연구, (42), pp.115~143 (2006), 한국동서철학회
- "조선왕조실록 숙종 11년 2월 6일조", ~
- 황의동, "우계 학파 연구", pp.73~ (1997)
- 권정안, "윤증 유학의 심학적 연원 -탄옹 권시를 중심으로, In 명재 윤증의 학문연원과 가학", pp.131~139 (2006)
- "명재선생연보, 가장", ~
- "노서유고 12, 상계형서", ~
- 김준석, "탕평정국기의 실무관인", 도산학보, 3, pp.104~ (1994)
- 신병주, "17세기 후반 소론학자의 사상", 역사와 현실, 13, pp.103~ (1994)
- "명재언행록 4, 문답상", ~
- 한우근, "백호 윤휴 연구", 역사학보, 15 (1961)
- 김준석, "유형원의 변법관과 국가제도개혁론, In 조선후기 정치사상사연구" (2003)
- 우경섭, "송시열의 세도정치사상연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 이상식, "조선후기 숙종의 정국운영과 왕권연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 이상식, "조선 肅宗代 君師父一體論의 전개와 왕권강화", 韓國史學報, (20), pp.165~192 (2005), 고려사학회
- 정호훈, "조선후기 이단 논쟁과 그 정치사상적 의미", 고려사학보, 10 (2001)
- 정경희, "숙종대 탕평론과 탕평의 시도", 한국사론, 30
- 정경희, "숙종후반기 탕평정국의 변화", 한국학보, 79
- 우인수, "조선 숙종대 정국과 산림의 기능", 국사관논총, 43 (1993)
- 김문식, "18세기 전반 권이진의 대외인식", 도산학보, 4 (1995)
- 이종성, "명재 윤증과 유회당 권이진의 사상적 연계성, In 명재 윤증의 학풍과 전개" (2007)
- 정두희, "송시열, In 조선시대 인물의 재조명" (1997)
- 김수태, "초기 한국천주교회의 배교문제", 동양학, 29 (1999)